@domjdietrich If it’s not just for England, my brother (Rams fan, not on x) and his mate are going to Toronto and catching a couple of games, Panama v Croatia and Senegal v Iraq. He’s happy to pass his details on. Message me if you’re interested Dom
@TeleFootball@Telegraph No-one knows the value of the video. Potential it gives them an unfair (against rules) advantage against an opponent who are cost their shot at £200m and that’s the aim is it? In that, the punishment exactly fits the crime. High stakes (lunatic) gamble. EFL made the right call.
@solentsport@JonoHolmes1 No-one knows the value of the video. Potential it gives them an unfair (against rules) advantage against an opponent who are cost their shot at £200m and that’s the aim is it? In that, the punishment exactly fits the crime. High stakes (lunatic) gamble. EFL made the right call.
@AdamAzor@MarkJLittlewood No-one knows the value of the video. Potential it gives them an unfair (against rules) advantage against an opponent who are cost their shot at £200m and that’s the aim is it? In that, the punishment exactly fits the crime. High stakes (lunatic) gamble. EFL made the right call.
@BBCMOTD@5liveSport No-one knows the value of the video. Potential it gives them an unfair (against rules) advantage against an opponent who are cost their shot at £200m and that’s the aim is it? In that, the punishment exactly fits the crime. High stakes (lunatic) gamble. EFL made the right call.
@Betfair@alanshearer No-one knows the value of the video. Potential it gives them an unfair (against rules) advantage against an opponent who are cost their shot at £200m and that’s the aim is it? In that, the punishment exactly fits the crime. High stakes (lunatic) gamble. EFL made the right call.
@Bigalanh5 No-one knows the value of the video. Potential it gives them an unfair (against rules) advantage against an opponent who are cost their shot at £200m and that’s the aim is it? In that, the punishment exactly fits the crime. High stakes (lunatic) gamble. EFL made the right call.
@AdamAzor It is proportionate in the context that they deliberately sought to disadvantage Boro from their shot at £200m by knowingly breaking the rules. High stakes, big sanction. Punishment fits the crime. Lunatic gamble - backfired. (I’m not a Boro fan)
@SouthamptonFC Plus, comparison to Leeds doesn’t fly. They specifically tightened up the rules as a result. If you expect similar sanction, you’re clueless and shouldn’t be in charge. I feel sorry for the poor fans / players that have been let down. Take responsibility for it, stop deflecting.
@SouthamptonFC I think it is proportionate, Phil. Don’t forget; You’ve potentially disadvantaged another team before their shot at £200m. Risky enough to knowingly breaking rules earlier in season but before the playoffs is lunacy. Huge gamble - it’s backfired. EFL spot on I’m afraid.
@RamsTalkPod@DerbyRetweets@JakeBarker1212@boocal_21@goalhangeryt Well said. Constant progress for the last 4 years. David Clowes is a god. It’s all bonus from this point. Would be amazing to take it to a playoff run, but however it ends, keep those heads up high.