@Rainerlax@mathisFOR2 also cites him placing the footage around 2022-23. Not saying he tweeted “it’s 2023” verbatim — it’s outlets summarizing what his sources told him.
@Rainerlax@mathisFOR2 GTA Intel, Notebookcheck, Tom’s Hardware — all citing Schreier’s assessment. “Everyone is saying X” isn’t a source, it’s just the same unverified claim getting repeated. Happy to drop this if you’ve got an actual outlet backing 2025, not just vibes from the replies.
@Rainerlax@mathisFOR2 One song from 2025 doesn’t override Schreier’s and multiple outlets’ analysis of the actual build/tech quality (physics, UI, animations) pointing to 2022-23. Different elements of a build can be patched at different times.
@Rainerlax@mathisFOR2 That’s not how it works though. Radio playlists get updated separately from the core build throughout development — it’s just an audio file swap, not a full rebuild.
@Rainerlax@mathisFOR2 The 2025 claim comes from the Cyberleek account itself the same source that also claims to have "the complete game, which nobody's verified either
@Rainerlax@mathisFOR2 Source? Because Jason Schreier (Bloomberg) and multiple outlets analyzing the footage are placing it around 2022-2023, visibly below Trailer 2's quality.
@GTAVista A publicly traded company would never attach a speculative Solana memecoin to its own game that's SEC/legal suicide if the price crashes and people lose money. The pre-planned crypto pump (created 3 days before the leak) points to a grift, not an official Rockstar marketing stunt
@ERAWA23@CyberLeekqmiv Sure, if he's taking that risk he might as well profit — I get the logic. My issue isn't that he's making money, it's dressing it up as some noble "fight for gamers" thing when it's really just a payday with a manifesto attached.
@ERAWA23@CyberLeekqmiv Never said I was forced to watch. I said it's shady to dress up a crypto grift as "gamer's rights." That's just... true, regardless of who's watching.
@cyberleek8 That plane looks nearly identical to GTA V's Duster (same yellow/blue livery, same silhouette). Likely a placeholder asset from an old dev build — not final GTA 6 content.
9/9
TL;DR: probably a real but old/partial vertical-slice build, likely mixed with content from different time periods, possibly touched up by someone with technical access. NOT proof the full game (incl. Lucia, story, final polish) has leaked.
🚨 GTA 6 Cyberleek leak: likely an OLD, non-final dev/test build, not "the whole game."
No button prompts, same outfit every clip, mixed timestamps (2023 clips + a 2025 song). Seeing the map ≠ full game playable.
Real reveal: 8/27 on Netflix. Don't touch $CYBERLEEK. 🚫
#gtavı
8/9
Take-Two is issuing DMCA takedowns aggressively — that's the strongest signal something real is in there. Companies don't usually burn legal resources chasing obviously fake/AI content. But "some real footage exists" ≠ "leaker has the complete finished game."
7/9
Most likely origin theory (unconfirmed, but timing fits): a former Rockstar employee let go in the late-2025 layoffs (30-40+ people across UK/Canada, more in Edinburgh) may have walked away with a pre-delay 2025 build out of resentment. Motive + timing line up.
6/9
Even the "2025 song = recent build" theory has a hole: if this leaker is (or got the files from) an actual dev/ex-dev, they'd have the know-how to manually swap a song into an older build to make the leak look fresher and more viral. Can't rule that out.
5/9
That plane flyover looks more like a free-cam/debug tool used to test streaming, LOD and draw distance — standard internal QA stuff, not a proof of a finished, playable open world.
4/9
"But you can see the WHOLE map in the plane video!" — true, but that doesn't mean the whole game is playable. In open world dev, world geometry/streaming is usually locked down long before missions, NPCs and content are finished everywhere. Seeing the map ≠ having the game.