Sting would be another person who's a hero.The music he's created over the years, I don't really listen to it, but the fact that he's making it, I respect that.
@HendrickD82@Music_Hoppy Dave you are only considering this from the point of view of UEFA rules. You also need to consider English law unfortunately. This guy ^^^ is correct.
@HendrickD82 Diarra case was based on principle of free movement of workers in the EU, which is irrelevant here (Brexit). FIFA rules also do not override English law- NFC could bring an action for inducement to breach and seek big compensation. FIFA sanctions on top. No-one wants that mess.
After a decade, by our calculations, of the most earnest, honest, dedicated and brilliant entertainment from @maxandivan it was great to finally meet them and tell them how much we've enjoyed seeing their shows. Hope to see this one again - brilliant!
@NoLayingUp There are various different mechanisms of establishing "control" of decision-making in a structure. E.g. the board (regardless of its makeup) may for some decisions need the approval of e.g. a "keystone investor." At this time, it's all conjecture and no-one really has any idea.
@NewYorkNixon@NoLayingUp Agreed, which is why I didn't say that ("over the course of" is not "100% of the time"). The point is that winning a major is extremely difficult, and it's hardly a stretch to suggest that singular focus is required/desirable due to the small margins involved.
@NewYorkNixon@NoLayingUp Solo competitor, major on the line, need to display athleticism, skill, & focus over the course of several hours...
I wonder why the likes of Tiger & Scheffler didn't sign up to unnecessary additional responsibilities that have nothing to do with the live, sporting task at hand.
@MrTwoFooted Not surprising. Last season's "Quadruple charge" was just a dead cat bounce for this team. Now the cat is festering, getting picked apart by maggots.
The attitude of the mainstream media to these revelations is about sunk cost. They cannot bring themselves to admit they were wrong about lockdowns, that the 'experts' didn't have a clue, and that the restrictions were about politics, not science.
@allen_scofield@AlastairMcA30@BBCNews Refuting the claims would require 1. effort and 2. a scientific approach. Whilst it would be great to see, and helpful for the discussion, sadly I think that it may be a stretch for this guy, given that he led with playground name-calling and incendiary buzzwords.
@AlistairHaimes@markepsom This graph does indeed show that it is unnecessary for a significant proportion of the population. Age, BMI & comorbidities are the key factors. More recent surveillance reports than the above (which is from Sept 21) also show that case rate is higher in vaccinated population.
@columeastwood@RCN_NI@SDLPlive@Derry_SDLP "I know whose side I'm on" ... I'm not sure that you do.
You wanted to sack them just last year, when to do so was not justifiable scientifically, ethically, or practically.
@JamesMelville It needs to be one step further. Before proceeding with any conflict transaction, they should be required to declare their conflict to an independent board, who must approve the transaction before it can proceed. Failure to do so should carry a custodial sentence.