Matt

tech | bitcoin is money, not jpegs

[Matt @mattmx]

@Fredvs79 @oomahq Also I'm just a pleb so I could have a small technicality wrong here, but that's the idea.

[Matt @mattmx]

@Fredvs79 @oomahq RDTS/BIP110 (Blake) will only accept an 83 byte op return or less and bitcoin core v30 blew this open. 84 byte+ op return will thus be invalid, so it won't be accepted by Blake nodes but Bitcoin Core nodes will accept it. This means you dump spamcoin and keep Blake Bitcoin.

[Matt @mattmx]

@radbackwards I had a buddy who worked for him and said he just avoids going to the office when he visits. He's been employed a really long time now.

[Matt @mattmx]

@GrassFedBitcoin If everything is good for Bitcoin, Bitcoin is good for nothing.

[Matt @mattmx]

@_Knotzi Satoshi waited this long to buy SR-strcUSX. All part of the plan.

[Matt @mattmx]

@hodlonaut @natbrunell @saylor @phongle I always wanted a wrapper of my wrapper of my wrapper of Bitcoin. Thanks Saylor!

[Matt @mattmx]

@EBALLIN21 @countbitcoin Trusting the rest of the firmware you have + deciding if you'll ever trust a firmware update in the future.

Everybody has a different tolerance for trust. They lost mine.

[Matt @mattmx]

@Trezor @MitchKlee_ @trezor does your rng algo fail closed if something is wrong? Or fail open by defaulting to the remaining sources of entropy? Would be nice to confirm, since Coldcard failed open and no one knew immediately.

[Matt @mattmx]

@5and2fish_bw Afaik they are proposing datum by default

[Matt @mattmx]

@CyberScrilla Let's say you only wanted to store btc. You buy a Safe 7. You have to decide to flash regular firmware vs BTC only firmware and you don't get confused by extra options. Which one do you pick? Be honest.

[Matt @mattmx]

@CyberScrilla I've followed you on YT for a long time now, I'm not sure if you will be convinced? Trying to be earnest here but let me know if you've already decided. We both know Trezor will never come out and admit their btc only firmware is more secure. That doesn't mean its all marketing.

[Matt @mattmx]

@CyberScrilla Marketing is a valid reason, but it doesn't negate others.

Do you expect to find the same amount of errors in a 100k line codebase over 10k lines of code?

Errors are going to happen regardless. It's about reducing attack surface, and marketing. Both are true all else equal.

[Matt @mattmx]

@mattkratter this guy understands, thought you might like to highlight him in one of your future vids: https://t.co/48zMiDPbWz

[lil c @seclilc]

AI;DR

(AI; didn’t read)

[Matt @mattmx]

@BTC_JEDI21 Bitcoin is captured

[Matt @mattmx]

@pastorcoin One is more secure from attackers, one is more secure from yourself (complexity and mistakes)

[Matt @mattmx]

@Dimi_h @lukedewolf I've been thinking about how much more Bitcoin legacy is open to attack now with Luke's departure. Some of us support his efforts, some of us don't, and some have a foot in both worlds. Simply letting Core client take over Bitcoin legacy is an acceleration of bitcoin's demise.

[Matt @mattmx]

@Trezor Silently updated: "may include older orders" - as in 90 day data retention wasn't followed