This is a lie. If he cared about these issues, we’d have court reform and a legislative stopgap by now. Instead we have the white supremacist court that has always acutely served the discreet interests of white supremacist men like him, and no one else.
We’re going to stand up for the women of America.
We’re going to protect contraception and IVF.
And we are going to restore Roe v. Wade as the law of the land.
@WaqarVick Agreed, but am very curious about this judge’s record. How often has she made such swift and finite pro-defense decisions when the defendant was anyone other than the richest and most famous person to ever enter her jurisdiction?
The Ivy League isn’t bad for being built by slave labor & actively upholding white supremacy for centuries. It’s bad cause it doesn’t punish people for protesting against the last surviving Anglo-American theocratic colony which systemically & deliberately oppresses brown people
@mynameisjro These delusional tirades are casting a really dangerous die. By catastrophizing a wholly imagined threat, they’re making room for deniers down the line to say “see there they to again, hysterical as usual” when actual dire threats do arise.
I need to expand my following horizons. All I see these days are bleak ass 15-tweet threads on how irreversibly busted the US legal system is & sassy takes about the shenanigans of purportedly famous people who sound made up.
Totally excited to spend time tonight trying to guess what qualifies for this completely clear + sufficiently definite rule.
Because guys, it’s cool: they *declare* it is clear. 🧵