@benga1scentre Nope, but they wouldn't have taken either of them, or any other player that was ranked high and made sense either. Hopefully the overweight, overpaid, "former" all pro that they gave up too much for won't get hurt and return to his best form because a "maybe" @ 10 was too risky
@wingoz ..And also have a recent history of players not making camp because of contract disputes. A top ten pick for a contract dispute is kinda bonkers in my opinion. I want him on the team, but the cost seems wild
@wingoz I don't understand trading away an almost guaranteed career pro bowler at #10 for a guy who, great as he may be, wants out from where he is because of a contract dispute over guaranteed money when you know damn good and well you aren't fond of giving players guaranteed money....
So I'm supposed to believe that @elonmusk knows who's in the Epstein files which are classified, but didn't know what was in the BBB, which is available to the public? π§π€π
@CinCity808 40. I can see them putting a little more emphasis on the run game this year and I don't think they'll (hope they won't) be playing from behind quite as much as they were last year.