Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡

Bitcoin ∞/21m
$MSTR 🧡

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

"Why don't you own any Bitcoin?" ----WRONG ANSWERS ONLY!

[Erik Voorhees @ErikVoorhees]

@MedbdyLLC "Now they've raised equity, and that's going to dilute the burn even further."

You have it backwards. Watch what happens.

[Erik Voorhees @ErikVoorhees]

Venice is a traditional company with equity. This was true before we sold 8.98% of the company, and it's true today.

Venice also has a token base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf, usable by customers within our app, and also as the target of our acquisition for burning.

Why are the incentives not misaligned with equity holders?

1. Because those who are equity holders also happen to be the largest holders of VVV, both indirectly as the entity holds the plurality of tokens, and directly through personal ownership. More than half of all VVV are held by equity owners of Venice, and this portion has increased over time both in percentage terms and in aggregate.

Show me any other project for which that last statement is true.

2. Because we've said exactly what we're going to do, both to our community of VVV holders and to the recent investors: we are going to grow our business, take a portion of revenue, and buy and burn as many tokens as we can.

We do this burn not to be altruistic, but in our self-interest (see #1).

Is the fear among crypto twitter that 8.98% of Venice equity holders will demand revenues are distributed as dividends instead of burns?

Let's think this through. First, they can't command such a thing as a minority. But more importantly, they won't, because they know what our intentions are and that's precisely why they invested. It's why they demanded direct token exposure through vesting warrants in addition to the indirect exposure through the treasury. It is on this understanding of our plans that 8.98% of the company was sold.

Surely there are many bad ways to do token/equity designs. Ultimately, regardless of intent, incentives win the day, and we have formed ours intentionally, and transparently.

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@tulipking You sound like you are bitter than you did not buy the token cheaper.

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@zerohedge Somebody needs to tell Zuck that its been done and that 15 year old ideas are poor use shareholder funds. My recommendation is to copy MSTR vs Google, Amazon, Microsoft , Oracle et al.

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@ErikVoorhees @ErikVoorhees Will Venice base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf hold $BTC on the balance sheet?

[Erik Voorhees @ErikVoorhees]

VVV and Capital

Measured by revenue, Venice has become the largest company at the intersection of AI and cryptoeconomics.

Today, we announced Venice’s first round of outside capital, a $65m Series A led by @dragonfly_xyz, valuing Venice’s equity at $1 billion.

Since we are an atypical company, this thread describes how this equity raise relates to the most valuable asset we have on our balance sheet, our capital token base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf

[Samson Mow @Excellion]

Nothing stops this train.

[Venice @AskVenice]

Claude Fable 5 is now available anonymously on Venice

[Michael Saylor @saylor]

Looking forward to Bitcoin Summer. 😎

[G.W. Jackston @galactiator]

$VVV $DIEM

"When you pay OpenAI or Anthropic, you swipe a credit card and pay per request. Useful price discovery, but you can't own your future inference. You can't pre-buy it cheaply, you can't resell it if you don't need it, you can't use it as collateral, and you can't budget for it predictably.

Tokenized inference flips this. DIEM converts inference into a tradeable, ownable asset:

You can pre-buy inference at today's prices and use it for years

You can resell inference you don't need to someone who does

You can budget because each DIEM gives a fixed, predictable daily amount

You can collateralize future inference yield in DeFi

You can integrate AI costs directly into your own product's tokenomics"

[Erik Voorhees @ErikVoorhees]

https://t.co/m2jsJuCX8k is already today this "unlinkable inference layer," a "VPN for AI"

Use any model (ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Grok) through Venice pseudonymously.

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@saylor Done

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@JBlunt1018 The problem is the majority come from one country and dominate one industry

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@VivekGRamaswamy No thanks as you also want more h1b visas that undermine American workers.

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@pulte Awesome..meritocracy should always be the plan.

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

America doesn’t need to import talent. We need to invest in it. 🇺🇸

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@USDOL Finally a Labor Dept. policy that makes sense...close all of the other loophole that Big Tech uses.

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@WhiteHouse @Bloomberg $100,000 IS NOT ENOUGH @WhiteHouse Close all the loopholes

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

No one should have to endure this! EVER!

[Max Satoshis ∞/21m ₿/acc🧡 @Max_Satoshis]

@blockchainchick Financial Strength