Tell me why you, as a potential member of the LGBTQ community, need Blake Treinen to wear a baseball hat with a rainbow on it. What does it do for you?
The Chicago Bears and Green Bay Packers have a historical record of bailing each other out over the past ~105 years to make sure neither ever moved or failed.
“If anyone’s gonna kill that bastard, it’s me.”
Chicago is so poorly managed that the Bears *have* to leave.
You may not want sports to be political, and I can absolutely sympathize with having no interest in what a barely literate Goliath shoved through school on account of his size and skill has to say about political things—but the business and cultural impact of sports is absolutely political. Has been since the Romans.
And yet you will find millions of leftwing NFL fans out there who will see this tragedy and never reflect on the fact that this centennial connection between team and city was brought to a sudden end purely on the back of the Democrat Party’s complete inability to govern.
A Party so incompetent and so disoriented that they cannot even maintain their circus.
I wanted Chicago to lose on the field—Soldier Field. But they’ve lost so much more. And for absolutely no reason.
National Park Service and Congress tried to authorize $300 million for this same project. Trump stopped it and picked a regular pool repair company.
Do you feel Seth told the truth here?
This sounds cool. But wait.
400 diapers will last a family with a newborn approximately five weeks.
The program will cost the state approx. $12.4 million this year alone.
That money will be funneled through a company called Baby2Baby, which will then provide their branded diapers to 400 participating in hospitals (California has over 500 hospitals in total.)
Meaning that instead of lowering taxes and letting families keep their own money to buy essentials like diapers, California takes their money, pumps it through a “nonprofit” that has overhead and whose CEO made $240,000 in 2024, to provide a “free” service available only in certain locations, and that you could have bought yourself for much cheaper.
Stop hijacking this team for your anti-Trump agenda. They can’t go. The NCAA girls have missed almost a month of school and 8 games with their NCAA teams. The PWHL Break is over. Unlike NHL players their teams can’t send charter planes to get them back by game time. They were extremely gracious in their statement explaining why they couldn’t come. They are patriots who love their country. Get over your TDS.
I don’t follow hockey, but this had me tearing up. They brought their teammate’s (who was killed by a drunk driver) kids out onto the ice with their dad’s jersey to celebrate the moment. 🥹
Trump did a 3 minute comedy set with Team USA after they won the gold medal.
“I’ve got to tell you I have to also invite the women’s team as well…or I’d be impeached”
Dear Devin,
How enlightening to receive an economics lesson from someone who apparently thinks wealth statistics work like a zero-sum game of Monopoly! Your "perspective" reveals such a fascinating misunderstanding of how wealth creation actually functions.
Let's start with your dramatic statistic about "8 men having more money than 4 billion people." You're confusing net worth with liquid cash, which is like saying someone's house equity means they're hoarding money from renters. Most of that wealth is tied up in companies that employ millions of people - you know, those job-creating entities that provide paychecks to the very people you claim to champion.
Here's a revolutionary concept: when Elon Musk's "wealth" increases, it's because Tesla stock rises due to the company creating value, employing over 140,000 people, and advancing electric vehicle technology. That wealth isn't sitting in a Scrooge McDuck vault - it's invested in factories, research, and innovation that benefits society. Amazing how market dynamics work when you actually understand them!
But let's address your real economic blind spot: blaming wealthy entrepreneurs instead of examining what actually makes people "broke." Perhaps it's the inflation caused by government spending that Democrats love so much? Or the regulatory burden that drives up costs for everything from housing to healthcare? Or maybe the minimum wage increases that price entry-level workers out of jobs entirely?¹
Your food stamp deflection is particularly rich. Nobody's blaming single parents for wealth inequality - we're questioning why Democrats fight so hard to expand dependency programs while opposing policies that create actual job opportunities. It's almost like you prefer people reliant on government assistance rather than climbing the economic ladder through work experience.
Here's what you missed in economics class: those "evil billionaires" you're demonizing? They're taking their money to build companies, buy equipment, advertise, and pay workers. They're shouldering all the risk while providing all the jobs. When a business fails, employees simply find new jobs, but the CEO loses their invested money. Those really wealthy people often have multiple business failures precisely because higher risk leads to higher reward.
Maybe instead of scapegoating successful entrepreneurs, you could explain why Democrat-controlled cities have the highest wealth inequality in America? Or why policies that claim to help the poor consistently keep them dependent rather than empowering them to build wealth themselves?
No rush though! Understanding actual economic principles instead of parroting wealth envy talking points probably isn't important to someone whose political identity depends on misunderstanding capitalism.
#WealthCreationNotEnvy #JobCreators #EconomicLiteracy #CapitalismWorks #RiskAndReward #ActualEconomics #StopBlaming Success #UnderstandWealth #MarketDynamics #CreateDontDestroy
¹ Research consistently shows minimum wage increases lead to job losses, particularly affecting entry-level workers the policy claims to help.