Only a king can give the law. Or heal the law.
Press F to pay respects to our ancient Anglo-American legal system. We’ll remember it as the expression of broad social wisdom it once was, not the sadistic communist bureaucracy it became.
Also did it ever really work that well
@Sargon_of_Akkad Democracy creates the most evil government possible for the same reason that taking antibiotics creates antibiotic resistant microbes.
I still stand by that Suicidal empathy is the wrong diagnosis on what is occurring in the west. It presents as that but at the core of it is Genocidal hatred for European people's.
When they question of your empathy its emotional blackmail to force you into a position you shouldn't be in.
When they call you a bad person for not allowing a billion Africans and Asians into your homeland? That's because you aren't allowing them to replace you. They don't care 1 iota about any of their pet migrants past the harm they cause to Europeans.
There is no American right. Right-wing politics in America is a contradiction in terms. Like mountaineering in Kansas.
America, the real place and its real people, can only be saved by escaping unconditionally from the whole American political mythos
What’s really, really amazing are all those who think they get it and don’t get it. This is an instruction on HOW to get the guns. When Saul Alinsky was writing this, Leftists were just as capable of being armed as any other civilian in America. They could even made and used bombs and ran full on terror orgs.
None of that is “the guns.” That is the mistake the vast majority of the right makes, particularly those who talk of there being no political solutions, or that we aren’t voting our way out of this. Even though communists had these, he was still saying “we are through peace and reformation through the ballot.”
Because the guns referred to here are not you, your AR-15 and the world, or even some militia or other private organization. What Saul Alinsky is communicating is this:
“We must use elections in order to gain enough control over the political offices which control the police, the military, the federal agencies, install our people within these positions, and then we will use this to enact our ideas by force.”
Saul Alinsky understood what very few on the right do, which is that any change, revolution, restructuring, restoration, whatever you’d like to call it, to create a new system, is required to use the exact system you wish to unmake in order to do so.
This is a fairly rigid historical pattern, with exceedingly few deviations, that any successful internal change requires people and leaders who are in positions within the existing system using those positions, and by extension, the guns which they are in power over, in order to then create something new.
Caesar, Napoleon, the Bolsheviks (yes this does fit them, they were an official elected party under the February Revolution), Franco, Hitler, Pinochet, Mao (he fits the bill as well, the Chinese system at the time was regional warlordism, so he became analogous to a warlord), Emperor Meiji, Cromwell. Cut across eras, ideologies, and nations, and you will find the pattern as consistently as I’ve seen.
So, if you want to change the system, you need to actually use the system that exists. Because the other pattern you’ll find quite consistent is that peasant revolts of total outsiders who never seize power first, never get those in position on side as leaders? They always get crushed. Consistent failures.
So, all you’re truly left with, if you actually want to restore America, revolutionize it, or even destroy it, is that you would either need to have someone who is in a significant enough position in the federal agencies which control guns or military generals launch coups, which I find exceedingly unlikely to occur, or you would need to have people take civilian positions of power, whether these are at state or the national level.
So yes, you actually really don’t have any other option except to vote your way out of this, which is far too tough a pill to swallow for many idealists, so they opt for fantasies of collapse and the people rising up, both of which are quite laughable. The only solutions are political solutions.
🇯🇵🙄 Japanese leftists are an existential threat to Japan.
It's no wonder Imperial Japan throughout the 1930s arrested and imprisoned Japanese leftists for being ideological threats to the Empire.
Yes. Political violence is inherently bad. This is because violence is inherently chaotic, chaos is inherently leftist, and leftism is inherently bad.
Watch a Bukele CECOT video. You will see not violence, but force and order—inherently rightist. We do not speak this language
@Will_Tanner_1 That's the nature of democracy. An inversion of hierarchy.
You can't tear down those above you (the king) without those below you tearing you down. Inversion doesn't stop when it reaches you. It goes all the way.
@ChristianHeiens Monarchies are glass cannons. It is very easy to smash them. Everyone knows who is in charge. The king is held responsible for all discontent. It is like an inverse panopticon. All eyes are on the king.
"Liberalism" (leftism) is the force of decay. A garden returning to nature.
“Humans don’t fight for principles and philosophy. They fight for the person who embodies their principles and philosophy. They don’t fight for revolutions. They fight for the revolutionary.” - Dusty Attenborough, Legend of the Galactic Heroes
This, more than anything, is why no right wing movement, no political movement at all, can truly succeed unless it rallies behind a leader, the best one that it has available to it. The best you can do without one is try to craft the environment better for one to come in the first place.
@AuronMacintyre The problem is reality inversion, Small government is monarchy.
Democracies and republics are totalitarian behemoths.
Somehow we have become confused.