Андрей Анатольевич

Разнорабочий умственного труда бюджетной сферы

[Андрей Анатольевич @maystru91]

@zer0idea А что израильские войска делали в Ливане. И в целом что евреи забыли на ближнем востоке? Для евреев есть еврейская автономный округ, это место созданное для них.

[Rocío Infante @RocioInfantesb]

“El feminismo hizo que las mujeres vieran a los niños como una carga, la maternidad como un castigo, los hombres como un rival, el asesinato de bebés como un derecho y el libertinaje como un logro”.

El movimiento feminista moderno ha sido un fracaso.

[Daniel Davis Deep Dive @DanielLDavis1]

It makes me sick to see videos like this. Every time infrastructure in Kyiv is destroyed and people are killed. Instead of recognizing the war can never be military won, Zelinsky, and all of his western backers have continued, year after year, to ignore this reality, condemning Ukraine to suffer like this.

You may be tempted to blame Russia, since they’re the ones that launched the missiles, and that is certainly true.

But what is unmistakable, is that we had it within our power to reach an acceptable diplomatic outcome that could’ve prevented the war in the first place in December 2021, and even more clearly brought this war to an end in April 2022 – and categorically rejected the idea, guaranteeing this level of destruction in Ukraine would continue on, as it has to this day.

Russia is threatening to do much more than what has happened in this strike tonight, so this may not be the worst of it.

How many more people have to pointlessly die before we finally recognize reality and bring this absurd war to end?

Despite what Zelenskyy says, and despite what western war supporters claim, there is NO military solution to this war for Ukraine, and it won’t matter how many interceptor missiles are provided, how many long range missiles, how much drone support, none of it. None of it will change the outcome.

Slowing down the Russian advance for a couple of months does not equal a path to reversing the course. It merely slows them down, slows down the destruction of Ukraine. It’s that simple. To continue to reject that military reality is to condemn more Ukrainian people to pointless death.

[Germán Iglesias @Geitley]

Si Rusia bombardea y mata a 21 estudiantes mientras duermen, son bárbaros y monstruos inhumanos. Portadas en todos lados, dando fe del mal en la Tierra.

Si lo hace Ucrania está bien. Cosas que pasan. Algo habrán hecho.

Y a esto, niños, es a lo que llamamos fascismo.

[свет @vadim07751823]

I nazisti ucraini inviano elicotteri ed aerei da combattimento sulla città, aprendo il fuoco contro coloro che considerava “separatisti”, nei pressi dell’aeroporto, della stazione e del mercato adiacente, uccidendo diversi civili!

Il 26/05/2014 ha inizio la guerra a Donetsk!

[Андрей Анатольевич @maystru91]

Тупая реклама частных американских разработчиков дронов.

[George Barros @georgewbarros]

We’re calling it: The war in Ukraine has entered a new phase.

@KatStepanenko and I have authored a new special report studying how Ukraine is actively challenging the positional character of the war that has dominated the battlefield since 2023.

Data on Russia’s battlefield performance indicates that the character of the war is shifting in favor of Ukrainian forces – at least for now. Russian forces rates of advances are stagnating while Ukrainian forces are employing novel tactics and operational concepts in efforts to break out of positional warfare. Neither Russia nor Ukraine can conduct operational maneuvers yet, however.

The bottom line is that the war in Ukraine is competitive and far from stalemated. Ukrainian forces are out-innovating Russian forces in both military technologies and in applying these new technologies in effective operational concepts that can help Ukrainian forces break out of positional warfare. Ukraine is employing mechanized equipment in tactical maneuvers in ways that were impossible 12 months ago. Russia’s ability to conduct infiltration missions will likely continue to degrade as Ukraine’s intermediate-range strike campaign pushes Russia’s logistics and forward operating bases further away from the frontlines, reducing resourcing to sustain infantry tasked with infiltration missions. Ukraine may be able to scale these effects if they resourced properly by international partners.

Ukraine’s advantage in intermediate range strikes is notably not permanent, and Russia will very likely eventually develop countermeasures to mitigate Ukraine’s advantages. Ukraine’s international partners thus have a rare and temporary opportunity to help Ukraine exploit favorable battlefield dynamics while Ukraine has the upper hand.

Key Points of the report:

• Russia’s rate of advance is plummeting during the Russian Spring-Summer 2026 offensive.

• Russia is losing more soldiers to make fewer gains, with monthly Russian casualty rates reportedly outpacing monthly recruitment since December 2025.

• Ukraine is starting to regain more ground than it is losing for the first time since 2023.

• Ukraine’ recent counterattacks feature unique characteristics and deviate from key trends that defined the positional character of the war since 2023.

• Ukraine is conducting a pattern of more frequent mechanized counterattacks at the tactical level for the first time since 2023.

• The Ukrainian command’s operational planning is maturing.

• Ukraine’s early 2026 counterattacks in the south were successful likely due to better planning and preparation of the battlefield.

• Ukraine has been conducting a coherent campaign to suppress and destroy Russian air defenses since late 2025, in order to shape the battlefield as part of more sophisticated campaign planning.

• Ukraine significantly intensified its intermediate-range strike campaign against dynamic targets in Spring 2026 in order to degrade Russian logistics at operational depths ahead of planned Ukrainian maneuver.

• Ukrainian forces started actively disrupting Russian railway logistics in occupied Ukraine and Russian western regions in Spring 2026.

• Ukrainian intermediate-range strikes are already achieving notable operational effects, including degrading Russia's ability to use the key Russian highway connecting Russia to occupied Crimea and GLOCs around Donetsk City.

• Ukrainian forces decisively seized the initiative in intermediate-range strikes by fielding new technologies such as the US-made Hornet strike UAV, among other systems.

• Ukrainian forces are achieving temporary tactical drone overmatch in some frontline sectors, which is slowing Russian offensive operations by degrading the effectiveness of Russian shaping operations.

• Ukrainian forces likely achieved tactical drone overmatch in certain frontline sectors after degrading Russia’s drone capabilities in late 2025 to early 2026 - primarily by suppressing drone launch positions and increasingly intercepting Russian tactical UAVs.

• Ukraine’s degradation of Russian forces at operational depth combined with tactical-level drone overmatch likely is creating vulnerabilities in the Russian lines.

• Ukraine’s intermediate-range strike campaign is likely far from its zenith, assuming continued support from Ukraine’s partners, and will likely intensify over 2026 as Ukraine fields new weapons capable of striking Russian’s operational rear.

Link to full report: https://t.co/rCeWbYJNiB

[Italo @peppipets]

>não tirou a blusa pq homens poderiam olhar
>tira foto sem a blusa e postou na net para todos homens olharem

lógica da mulher moderna

[Patricia @Patriciaaxp]

Vous vous souvenez de l’hôpital « Okhmadet », que la Russie aurait soi-disant bombardé ?
Il n’y avait pas un seul enfant là-bas, c’était une mise en scène entièrement orchestrée, comme Boutcha et tout ce que touche la main sale et achetée de l’Ukraine et de l’Occident.

[Mann im Schatten 🇷🇺 @vladi_the_gr8]

Die Drohnenkomponenten, mit denen Kinder in der Hochschule von Starobilsk getötet wurden, werden im Westen hergestellt, und genau dort tragen sie die Verantwortung für ihren Tod, erklärte Jana Lantarova.

Ausländische Journalisten haben Wrackteile und Flügel von Drohnen mit ausländischen Kennzeichnungen gesehen, daher kann von einer „Inszenierung und russischer Propaganda“ überhaupt keine Rede sein, betonte die Menschenrechtsbeauftragte in Russland.

„Sie haben gezielt geschossen, denn es gab drei Raketenwellen, 16 Drohnen. Und das Wichtigste, was sie sagen, ist, sie hätten auf militärische Objekte geschossen. Aber wo sind die militärischen Objekte? Jeder kann sehen, dass es keine gibt. Als die Eltern hier standen, als wir ihre Schreie und ihren Weinen hörten, als die Rettungskräfte arbeiteten — sie, die Streitkräfte der Ukraine, schossen und schossen weiter. Die Sucharbeiten wurden ständig unterbrochen. Sie schossen auf Kinder. Sie warteten. Aber in der UNO sagen sie, das sei alles Fake", sagte Lantarova.

Lantarova zeigte Fotos der Kinder und sprach über ihre Hobbys, Träume und Pläne. Die meisten der getöteten Studentinnen werden in Brautkleidern begraben.

"Und wissen Sie, was noch schrecklich ist? Der Menschenrechtsbeauftragte in der Region hilft den Familien bei den Beerdigungen. Viele Eltern von Mädchen, die heiraten wollten, wollen, dass ihre Töchter in Brautkleidern begraben werden. Es ist sehr schwer, sich das Leid dieser Eltern vorzustellen", sagte Lantarova.

[Alina Lipp @Alina_Lipp_X]

Aufnahmen VOR dem Anschlag der Ukraine auf das Schülerwohnheim in Starobelsk, Lugansk!!! DAS ist euer "militärisches Objekt", ihr Terroristen!? Es ist so unfassbar

[Juan R. @anfrase]

Porque los medios occidentales no quieren cubrir la masacre de los niños en el colegio ruso..

Porque la cruda realidad desmontaría las mentiras que nos cuentan sobre la guerra...

[Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil @ivan_8848]

‼️‼️‼️Lugansk dorm search ops COMPLETE — Russia’s EMERCOM

Bodies of 21 KILLED recovered

FOOTAGE: Total destruction after Ukrainian attack

❗️❗️❗️ Another war crime by Ukraine that won't make headlines in the West.

[Ministerstwo Prawdy @Minister_Prawdy]

W Rosji nadal głównym tematem jest zbombardowanie przez ukraińców akademika i szkoły, gdzie już wydobyto z gruzów 16 zwłok dzieci.
Zachodnie media w ogóle nie są zainteresowane tematem, ale nie ma się co dziwić, bo również nie były zainteresowane jak ukraińcy przed wojną zabili ponad 16,000 rosyjskojęzycznych ukraińców na wschodniej ukrainie.

[Шамиль Гаджиевич @shoom2005]

Шаровары визжали что мол попали в их садик , а детьми оказались впавшие в детство солдаты всу дислоцированные в нём. Прилетает в ответ по Старобельскому колледжу , но вот беда военных не обнаружено ,а из под завалов до сих пор достают детей. Почувствуйте разницу.

[coolfonpl 🇵🇱 @coolfonpl]

Unia Europejska dała 90 mld euro Ukrainie.
Co robi Ukraina? Zamiast celów wojskowych bombarduje akademik z 86 dzieciakami.
W budynek trafiły minimum 4 drony, więc to nie jest przypadek, a zbrodnia wojenna.

[CodeFlyPigs 🇷🇺 @codeflypigs]

Что показал в очередной раз сегодняшний теракт, когда украинцы ударили по детскому общежитию?

Украинцы, когда на войне гибнут украинские дети, пишут слезливые посты, взывая к нашей совести, они знают что она у нас есть

Украинцы, когда гибнут русские дети, упражняются в шутках

Русские, когда гибнут любые дети, скорбят, потому что у нас есть совесть

Мы разные

[Martin Sonneborn @MartinSonneborn]

Low Representative
Sie war Premierministerin eines Landes, das weniger Einwohner hat als München. Sie schrieb ein Buch, in dem nichts steht. Und ohne ihren Vater (Siim Kallas) wäre sie vermutlich nicht Staatsfrau, sondern irgendetwas Passenderes geworden geworden (Lifestyle-Influencerin).

Die Chefdiplomatin der EU ist eine solche Nullnummer, dass noch nicht einmal ein Schmierlapp wie Marco Rubio ihr einen Termin für „bilaterale Gespräche“ gewähren will. Sie bestreitet, dass Russland & China die Sieger des II. Weltkriegs sind („das ist mir neu“), verwechselt Boris Pistolius mit Armin Laschet, träumt offen davon, Russland in kleinere Staaten zu zerlegen, rät den Menschen und sich selbst, „jetzt mit dem Trinken anzufangen“, und beschuldigt, während sie selbst keinen einigen Mitgliedsstaat hinter sich hat, alle anderen Länder der Welt, (aufs Bösartigste) die schöne EU zu „spalten“.

Wem Einblicke in ihr diplomatisches Genie & ihr strategisch komplexes Denken noch fehlen, der betrachte allein ihre Wortmeldungen aus der vergangenen Woche.

Erst erläuterte sie ihr „Konzept“ von Europa als erdkundlicher Entgrenzung, bei dem es nicht um „Geographie“, sondern um „Werte“ gehe, weshalb die Europäische Union ebenso gut in Guinea-Bissau, Kanada und Nordkorea liege.

Dann schlug sie vor, im Rahmen der als EU-Korrelat zur chinesischen Seidenstraße angelegten „Global Gateway“-Initiative außenpolitisch aufmüpfigen Staaten die Gelder zu entziehen, um die EU-Außenpolitik damit - sinngemäß - darauf zu beschränken, Staaten, die noch unbedeutender und lächerlicher sind als wir, (nach dem bewährten Prinzip der Doppelmoralität) öffentlich anzukläffen.

Zuletzt verglich sie China mit einer „Krankheit“ und die chinesische Wirtschaftspolitik mit „Krebs“, dem die europäischen Staaten bisher lediglich mit „Morphiumgaben“ (Unternehmenssubventionen) beizukommen versuchten, anstatt eine „Chemotherapie“ (Protektionismus & Wirtschaftskrieg) zu beginnen.

Und nun erklärt sie im Europaparlament, dass die EU, die unter ihren Vorgängern immerhin so etwas wie das Zentrum der internationalen Irandiplomatie gewesen war, keine Strategie für den Mittleren Osten habe, weil da einfach zu viel los sei.

Die Kommentare im Netz reichen von „Bullshit Barbie“ bis hin zu Vorschlägen, das Amt der „High Representative“ umständehalber vorübergehend in „Low Representative“ umzubenennen.

Falls Sie sich gegen die ebenfalls für den Job gehandelten (und aus anderen Gründen ebenso ungeeigneten) Kandidaten Merkel, Draghi & Stubb durchsetzen und wunschgemäß zur Chefunterhändlerin im Ukrainekrieg werden sollte, könnte es für uns Europäer brenzlig werden.

Im Parlament nennen wir Kallas (und ihre explosive Mischung aus Geltungssucht & Selbstüberschätzung) heimlich die europäische Nuklearoption: Sie ist unsere kleine (umweltfreundlichere) Atombombe, unter der in Nullkommanichts, wenn sie kommt, alles in die Luft geht, was noch steht.

Oder um es in ihren eigenen Worten zu sagen:

„Tohutu ummik. Napilt jõudsime õigeks ajaks lennujaama. Siis enne lennukit vaidlus: käime tualetis ära - ma ei taha."
(„Riesiger Stau. Gerade rechtzeitig am Flughafen. Großer Streit: Gehen wir kurz aufs Klo? - Nein, ich will nicht.")

[Андрей Анатольевич @maystru91]

Всё так, рыбарь просто военкурятник разгоняющий панику, ничего не знающий про обстановку на местах.

[Armchair Warlord @ArmchairW]

I have remarked on many occasions that Russian voenkor outlets have basically no inside sources in the Russian Army in Ukraine and get a lot of their news from reading Ukrainian propaganda.

Rybar - one of the largest - just proved it. Let's return to Stepnogorsk and Borovaya.⬇️

Yesterday Rybar posted two updates on the west Zaporozhie and south Kharkov sectors of the front line. Coincidentally the day after I posted skeptically about those sectors myself and called them out for laundering Ukrainian propaganda, but I digress. And - predictably for mappers - they doubled down.

In West Zaporozhie, Rybar marked up Stepnogorsk - a town with a number of comblock apartment buildings in its center and generally a solid defensive stronghold - as having been largely cleared by the AFU. Their evidence for this? The same Ukrainian propaganda video I posted two days ago - a heavily blurred mess showing a handful of AFU troops dismounting from two APCs in a low-rise suburb, which was accompanied by a text claim of having seized the town from the Russians. They're quite explicit in their post that this video alone was what led to them making this assessment.

As I pointed out in my original post, it's likely this small group of Ukrainian infantry was killed by an airstrike shortly after dismounting - they certainly haven't been seen or heard from since after likely attacking during low-visibility conditions on or about May 4th. Alternatively they may have attacked during heavy cloud cover during the May 15-18 timeframe, which would make the video VERY recent - and its release a reckless breach of operational security regardless of the amount of blurring being done. In any event it shows nothing more than a squad attack well outside the town center of Stepnogorsk, conducted in low-visibility conditions that hinder drone operations. Significant portions could have easily been shot elsewhere and edited in. Rybar accepted the Ukrainian claims without question regardless, marked up their map, and posted some defeatist commentary to go with it.

Earlier today, the Russian unit operating in the area publicly denied the claim and posted a video of them attacking a couple small handfuls of Ukrainian infantry with drones in a rural area and the outskirts of a settlement, and destroying a couple AFU trucks on country roads. Rybar does not seem to have consulted them on the matter. As of this writing, no Ukrainian flags have gone up in Stepnogorsk.

Now to Borovaya. Yesterday Rybar reverted their map (where they had previously marked up a very small Russian control zone in the eastern outskirts of the town based on geolocated video) and straight-face claimed that Russian troops had assaulted and actually taken the town in late April, but then had their supply lines cut off by the AFU (somehow) and been forced to retreat. The Russian General Staff then apparently decided to announce the town had been seized regardless, for some reason.

Rybar entirely missed this action - which must have been a considerable battle and presumably worthy of commentary at the time it was going on - while it was allegedly happening. They only posted this very strange narrative after having consulted with parties unknown after the status of Borovaya became a topic of discussion, and they again ran with a Ukrainian framing that acknowledged an attack had taken place but minimized Russian gains in the area. The Russian unit responsible has doubled down on their claim that they control all of Borovaya, and the AFU has provided no evidence that they continue to hold the town despite this actually being something of a hot-button topic right now.

I remind the reader that the AFU is quick to exploit the Russians getting over their skis with control claims. A couple weeks ago the Russians claimed to have seized the border village of Miropolia in Sumy Oblast, and within hours the AFU had a video out showing a couple of rather forlorn-looking infantrymen in the center of town with a Ukrainian flag. Perhaps they were doomed holdouts, perhaps this was a last bit of propaganda before the Russians swept through (the AFU's done that before) - but the point is that the AFU put video evidence on the table and made propaganda hay immediately when they had a chance to peacock and make the Russians look like liars. In these two much larger towns, in far more important front sectors? Crickets.

Which brings me back to my original point. In both of these cases Rybar's map updates and analysis trailed and in fact conformed to Ukrainian propaganda framing and entirely ignored what the actual units responsible for these sectors had to say for themselves. And in both of these cases the evidence at hand does not fit the narrative that's being put forward.

All of this suggests rather strongly that Rybar lacked any inside information from the Russian military on the front situation and in fact relied entirely on Ukrainian propaganda and/or discussions with Ukrainian propagandists to seed their analysis. And even then they didn't apply a lot of critical thinking to what they were getting! Simply put, the Russian Army seems to have really tightened down on OPSEC recently and the leak vectors out of the front line that many voenkors previously relied upon have dried up - this is likely why they're still crying about the Starlink cutoff, by the way. That's an obvious way for journalists to extract information out of the front line and it's likely that was their means of communicating with sources.

This goes back to something I say frequently when the fog of war thickens, as it appears to be thickening in Ukraine. Practice informational hygiene. Consider not just the sources you're getting your information from but where they themselves sourced it, and form your own opinions accordingly. And be aware that source quality can and does vary over time and between geographical and subject matter areas.

[redpillbot @redpillb0t]

The Climate Change hoax vanished the moment companies needed data centers.

Yeah, we noticed.