Bison

[Andrew Lawton @AndrewLawton]

Canadians have sent 240,000 postcards to senators urging them to oppose Liberal Bill C-9.

Until this morning, the Senate was hiding these postcards in a warehouse in Gatineau. This morning, they were moved to a Senate room, but they still aren't being delivered to senators.

[Thomas Sowell Daily @DailySowell]

Thomas Sowell on engineers vs intellectuals:

“The engineer is judged by the end product. If he builds a building that collapses, it doesn’t matter how brilliant his idea was—he’s ruined.”

“Conversely, if an intellectual has an idea for rearranging society and that ends in disaster, he pays no price at all.”

[Mr. Bill K. 🇨🇦🏴🇺🇲 @KieserBill]

Liberal corruption exposed and still no charges. Politicians are not above the law, so where are the RCMP on these matters?

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

WHOA!

Canada’s integrity commissioner issued an emergency warning this week.

Federal wrongdoing complaints: 638 in 2025.

Whistleblowers waiting months, sometimes over a year, JUST TO HAVE THEIR FILES OPENED.

Her own words:

“I cannot guarantee that allegations of wrongdoing and reprisal will be investigated in a timely manner.”

Some complaints “may never see the light of day.”

She needs her budget DOUBLED to function.

Now look at what Carney did the moment he got his majority:

Restructured all parliamentary committees so Liberals control them.

Shut down the PrescribeIT $300M investigation on day one.

Let the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s contract expire.

Turned off cameras at the Health Committee.

The integrity office is drowning in complaints.

Carney is systematically dismantling every mechanism that could act back on them.

And don’t you dare say it’s incompetence.

This is by design.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 BREAKING: The ethics committee just recommended:

Prime Ministers must SELL their assets within 60 days of taking office.

Not a blind trust.

Sell them.

And must fully divest from tax havens.

This is aimed DIRECTLY at Mark Carney.

Who chaired Brookfield funds worth $30 BILLION registered in Bermuda AND the Cayman Islands.

He’s got 103 companies on his conflict of interest screen.

Not to mention, his conflict screen is run by his own chief of staff and Clerk of the Privy Council,

BOTH POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS.

The committee passed this WITH opposition support.

Carney’s response?

Within days of winning his majority, he announced plans to restructure parliamentary committees so Liberals have control.

I could have sworn I saw CTV yesterday saying that committees aren’t a big deal & we should stop complaining. 🧐

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

20+ years ago,

I read a book called Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky.

This is EXACTLY what the media is doing right now, and desperately trying to remove Poilievre.

Chomsky argued that the media "are effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a system-supportive propaganda function, by reliance on market forces, internalized assumptions, and self-censorship, and without overt coercion".

The difference today is that the reliance is not on market forces.

ITS RELIANCE IS ON THE GOVERNMENT THAT SUBSIDIZES THEIR EXISTENCE.

The idea that Pierre should step down,
is an idea manufactured by THEM.

Not by Conservatives.

The hypocrisy is this: the same people that want Pierre removed, are the same people
that praise his ideas, when Carney steals them, and waters them down…to the point of ineffectiveness.

This is what is happening in Canada right now: the Manufacturing of Consent.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

Current and former editors just testified at Parliament that 7 years of government subsidies have PERMANENTLY COMPROMISED Canadian media.

The 2019 bailout was supposed to be temporary.

It never ended.

The payments are secret & it’s the only federal program that doesn’t disclose what each company gets.

The government decides who qualifies as a “journalist” to receive the money.

141 news corporations now receive secret federal payments.

Media that take the money get better access.

Media that don’t are left outside.

Now you know why they never ask the hard questions.

You’re no longer watching the news, you’re watching the government’s investment ☹️

[Vote Canada @VoteCanadaCom]

Marilyn Gladu @MarilynGladuSL Caught In Potential Criminal Bribery Scandal Over Floor Crossing Pork For Projects

https://t.co/vUsOinWWxu

Marilyn Gladu crossed the floor from the Conservative Party to the Liberal caucus on April 8, 2026. This move brought Prime Minister Mark Carney one seat closer to a functional majority in the House of Commons. Hours after the announcement, Gladu told a local reporter in Sarnia that she had received a call from the office of the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure. The purpose of the call was to discuss all the things the riding of Sarnia Lambton Bkejwanong needed. She stated that her previous requests for funding had gone nowhere while she remained on the opposition benches. She sent a one page list of projects to the minister after her 2025 re election. Those projects aligned with his file but produced no results until she switched parties.

Section 119 of the Criminal Code of Canada addresses bribery of judicial officers and others, including members of Parliament. The law states that every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years, who being the holder of a judicial office or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, directly or indirectly, corruptly accepts, obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain for themselves or another person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by them in their official capacity. The same section also makes it an offence for anyone who directly or indirectly, corruptly gives or offers to such a person or to anyone for the benefit of that person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by that person in their official capacity.

In this situation, the timing raises serious questions under the law. Gladu herself connected the lack of progress on her riding projects to her status as an opposition member. She noted that it is harder to get funding when not on the government benches. She observed that after she crossed the floor, the call from the ministers office arrived immediately. Federal funding for infrastructure, housing and local projects qualifies as valuable consideration that benefits the riding and the member politically. If the prospect or promise of accelerated access to such funds influenced her decision to change her official capacity from opposition critic to government supporter, then the elements of corrupt acceptance or offering could apply. The key legal term is corruptly, which courts assess based on all surrounding circumstances, including public statements and the direct link between party switch and funding discussions.

Cabinet denied any pork barreling when opposition members raised the issue in the House of Commons. Gladu later described the floor crossing as the best thing for her riding, for the country and for herself during the Liberal national convention. She had previously supported calls for mandatory byelections when members switch parties. Local reaction in the historically Conservative riding of Sarnia Lambton Bkejwanong included protests outside her constituency office and public expressions of betrayal. The Sarnia mayor urged a byelection to let voters decide. Gladu maintained that no explicit offer was made but her own words tied improved government support directly to her new status on the government side.

This case fits a pattern where discretionary federal funding programs give ministers significant leeway. Such programs can appear to reward political alignment rather than follow strict merit based criteria. Data on past infrastructure allocations has shown variations in how funds flow to government held ridings versus opposition ones across different administrations. While governments defend targeted spending as legitimate constituent service, the optics of a swift ministerial call right after a defection fuel public suspicion. Few prosecutions under section 119 have targeted members of Parliament for matters involving pork barreling. Most similar controversies end in political debate, ethics reviews or Auditor General findings rather than criminal charges. The threshold for proving corrupt intent remains high and requires evidence such as internal communications or clear conditional promises.

The Gladu situation highlights how concentrated power over billions in discretionary spending invites questions about accountability. Her constituents and the broader public deserve full disclosure of all communications between her office and the ministers office regarding projects before and after April 8, 2026. An independent review or formal complaint to authorities could examine whether the facts meet the legal test under section 119. Without such scrutiny, trust in the system continues to erode regardless of which party holds power.

[Dave W. Palmer, CD @Blue22Dave]

ONE BRAVE ONTARIO JUDGE SAID THIS, AND IT SHOULD STOP EVERY CANADIAN IN THEIR TRACKS

This came straight out of a Canadian courtroom, from an actual judge.

Antonio Skarica, sitting on the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, just put the entire system on blast.

He said the quiet part out loud.

He called Canada’s justice system an “inflection point” and asked a question that should make every Canadian stop and think:

Who are we prioritizing… the victim, or the offender?

A Nigerian university student, identified in reporting as Osemeir, targeted a Canadian woman. He extorted her. He shared her intimate images. He left her living in what the judge described as “constant fear.”

That’s not minor. That’s not a slap-on-the-wrist situation. That’s someone’s life being torn apart.

Now here’s where it gets uncomfortable.

The Crown, the prosecutors, were looking for a sentence of two years less a day.

Why does that matter?

Because under Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, once you hit a sentence of two years or more, it can trigger serious immigration consequences, including deportation and loss of appeal rights.

So that one-day difference isn’t small. It’s everything.
On the other side, the defense wasn’t even asking for jail time. They were pushing for a conditional discharge, which would have allowed him to stay in Canada.

The judge saw exactly what was happening. He didn’t ignore it. He addressed it directly.

He said, "If decisions are being influenced by immigration consequences, if sentences are being shaped not just by the crime, but by what might happen after, then we’re creating a system that’s no longer consistent."

His words point to something bigger:

A system where outcomes can start to look different depending on who’s standing in front of the court.

And this isn’t just one judge speaking out.

A judge in Quebec, Antoine Piché, raised the same issue, saying prosecutors are sometimes proposing lighter sentences or discharges for non-citizens specifically because of the risk of deportation.

He warned that this creates what he called an “unnecessary two-tier system.”

Two different tracks of justice. Not based on the crime, but based on the consequences tied to immigration status.
Now before people start twisting this into something it’s not, this isn’t about ignoring rights, and it’s not about going after people because of where they’re from.

This is about something much simpler.

Consistency.

If the same crime doesn’t lead to the same kind of outcome, people are going to notice. And when they notice, they start losing trust.

Because for the victim, none of these legal layers matter.

They care about one thing, did justice actually get done?

And when even judges inside the system are publicly saying, “we’re at a breaking point,” that’s not something you brush off.

That’s a warning.

Not from me.

From inside the system itself.

So Wake Up Canada, we must all stand behind those who are showing us the truth in real time.

[Wiretap Media @WiretapMediaCa]

💥REPORT: Former diplomatic prisoner and Global Network for Strategic Effect founder Michael Krovrig drops a DIRE warning to Canadians — Mark Carney’s new China trade deal is a national security nightmare.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Historian Bill Federer: "By 2030, there will be a majority Muslim population in Europe, and they’ll just flat out vote in Sharia law.

People forget Egypt was completely Christian for 6 centuries. It's not anymore. All of North Africa was completely Christian for 6 centuries. It's not anymore.

Constantinople was the largest Christian city in the world, and the largest Christian church in the world for hundreds of years was the Hagia Sophia. And it was turned into a mosque.

They want to do the same thing with the Vatican."

Pay attention to what he’s saying!

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

Liberal incompetence in FULL display.

They canceled energy East pipeline without studying the economic impact.

Liberals have zero idea how many billions of dollars we just lost.

HOW EVEN ONE PERSON CAN VOTE LIBERAL is beyond me

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 WOW

University of Guelph just banned a young woman FOR LIFE from campus.

Her crime?

Standing NEAR a conversation she wasn’t even part of.

Her family member was talking to a group of people.

She was in the vicinity.

That’s it.

The Campus Safety Office decided the TOPIC of that conversation was sufficient grounds for a lifetime ban.

Not her words.

Not her actions.

A conversation she was LISTENING to.

Soon, having the wrong opinions NEAR YOU is gonna be a crime.

OH WAIT, TOO LATE - SHE GOT BANNED!

[Bradshaw @myabradshaw78]

Mark Carney cuts funding for Canada’s military and Veterans BUT is helping Ukraine set up a Fund for Ukraine’s Veterans.

[Matt Strauss @strauss_matt]

What is even the point of Parliament?

At Health Committee, we asked to see the PrescribeIT contracts, in which the Liberals blew $250 million on NOTHING.  

But Mark Carney’s Chief Filibuster Officer spent 2 hours talking to prevent us from seeing it.

I asked why at Question Period, but the Chief Filibuster Officer took the question and…. Filibustered.

That’s why I went to ask again tonight in the House:

[Karl Harrison @KarlDHarrison]

An Open Letter to the Five Members of Parliament Who Crossed the Floor. 🔥💯

“To the Members of Parliament who chose to abandon the voters who elected you,

There are moments in public life that define a person—not by what they say, but by what they do. Your decision to cross the floor mid-mandate is one of those moments. And it will follow you.

You did not earn your seat under the banner you now carry. You did not campaign on the platform you now support. Canadians placed their trust in you based on clear promises, clear affiliations, and clear values. That trust was not yours to trade, reassign, or surrender once it became politically convenient.

Switching jerseys in the middle of the game is not strategy. It is betrayal.

And it is not a small one.

Every single vote that put you into office came from a Canadian who believed you stood for something specific. They believed their voice mattered. They believed you would carry that voice into Parliament with integrity. Instead, you took that mandate and handed it to a government those same voters did not choose to empower.

That is not representation. That is a reversal of consent.

You may justify your actions however you like—strategy, stability, national interest—but none of those explanations change the fundamental truth: you were not elected to do this. If your convictions truly changed, the honourable path was obvious—step down, face your constituents again, and ask for their permission.

You didn’t.

Instead, you chose the path that benefited you while silencing the people who trusted you.

And here is the part that cannot be avoided:

Every day you look in the mirror, you are looking at the face of that decision.

The face tied to every vote that put you where you are—and every voter who was left behind when you walked away from them.

You may gain position, influence, even reward. But none of that changes what this is.

Because of your actions, a government now holds power it did not win at the ballot box. A majority carries enormous weight—over the economy, over policy, over the everyday lives of Canadians. That power was not freely granted. It was assembled through your defection.

And the cost will not be yours to bear.

It will be carried by hard- working Canadians—by families already stretched thin, by small businesses trying to survive, by people who now feel their vote can be taken and repurposed without their consent.

That is a dangerous precedent.

Because when people begin to believe their vote no longer truly matters, the damage goes far beyond one decision, one Parliament, or one government. It cuts at the foundation of trust itself.

Canadians deserved better than this.

They deserved representatives who either stood by their word—or had the integrity to return to the people and seek a renewed mandate when that word changed.

You chose something else.

And Canadians will remember, history books will remember……your name.

Sincerely
an ordinary Canadian ,

Stephanie La Porta
West Vancouver
BC”

[Adam The Apostate @The1Apostate]

I'm an ex-Muslim. I left Islam when it was safe for me to do so. The punishment for apostasy in Islam is death. The UK wants to enforce an Islamophobia bill which silences ex-Muslims from sharing our experiences. This would be another nail in the coffin for freedom of speech

[David Atherton @daveatherton]

Adam does supreme work in exposing the excesses of Islam and is very brave to do so.

He is nearing 40,000 followers, can we get him over the line?

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

They are calling for the genocide of Whites

[Philip Lawrence @PLawrenceCAN]

The Liberals' newest MP told the media that her letters to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure "[...]went really nowhere, until I crossed the floor."

She said the Minister's staff contacted her the day after she crossed the floor wanting to discuss projects in her riding that needed funding.

The Minister says he has no knowledge of this.

If ministerial staff are only paying attention to letters from Liberal ridings, then this is the very definition of corruption.

We need an investigation.