Following the horrific murder of Henry Novak, the name Kriss Donald has come up.
Many don’t know what happened to Kriss. And they certainly don’t have an update on his convicted murderers. You might be surprised by this.
This all makes me rather angry. Hold on to your seat and here we go…
On 15 March 2004, 15 year old Kriss was walking with a friend, Jamie Wallace, on Kenmure Street in Glasgow.
A silver Mercedes with five men (led by Imran Shahid) pulled up and grabbed Kriss and his friend. Jamie managed to escape but Kriss was forced into the car.
So what had Kriss done to upset these men? Absolutely nothing. Imran and his group of Pakistani thugs had been in an altercation with some other white men earlier at a nightclub. They were angry and picked on a random (and innocent) white boy to have their revenge.
The gang drove him around for hours in the car before they took him to a secluded spot by the river. There they held his arms while they stabbed him 13 times, causing severe internal injuries - to a lung, the liver and a kidney.
At this point, poor Kriss was already dying from blood loss but he was still fighting to stay alive.
These horrific human beings then doused him in petrol and set him on fire. Kriss rolled on the floor, trying to extinguish the flame, but ultimately he died from blood loss and the impact of the burning.
His body was found the next day.
Some of the suspects fled to Pakistan but were eventually brought back to face justice for this barbaric racially motivated and heinous murder.
So what happened to the five men?
Imran Shahid (ringleader): he received life imprisonment, minimum 25 years. He has been as much of a bully inside prison as he was on the outside and has an additional 20 months added to his sentence for an assault when in prison. He also pretended to convert to Judaism so he can have better food and has sued the prison service over wanting a penis pump and having his Xbox removed (it was feared he was using it to access the internet). He is able to apply for parole in 2031
Zeeshan Shahid (his brother): received a life sentence with a 23 years minimum. Eligible for parole in 2029.
Mohammed Faisal Mushtaq; received a life sentence with a 22 years minimum. Eligible for parole in 2028/2029.
Daanish Zahid: received a life sentence with a minimum of 17 years but he also got an additional sentence for 6 years for lying to the court. He is eligible for parole in 2027 and there have been exploratory discussions for work placements/community work on his release.
Zahid Mohammed was part of the kidnapping but left the group before the stabbing and burning. He received only 5 years and was set free after only 2.5 years. He then changed his name to Yusef Harris and was back in prison for 4 years in 2017 after he threatened to murder someone, was found carrying a knife and drove a car at a police officer. He is now free and nobody knows where he is.
By 2031, most, if not all, of these menacing and violent men could be back on the streets in the UK.
Kriss deserved better.
@RupertLowe10 I doubt it would translate up here in Scotland, everything has to be done differently and the complete opposite of whatever is being done in England. All the little play areas near me look like this, I have a toddler and I can take her to any of them
The Two Minutes They Won’t Take: What Remembrance Reveals About Muslims in Britain
No different to previous years, I attended yesterday's Remembrance service in Oldham. It is not just this year, it is the same every year. The absence, unmistakable. Apart from the Muslim councillors and officials whose roles required attendance, I could not see a single fellow Muslim face in the crowd alongside me.
In a town where Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslims constitute a significant portion of the population, this near-total absence of brown faces in the crowds demands explanation.
It is not just in Oldham. This pattern extends across Britain.
During Remembrance weekend, Muslim communities that readily mobilise for Palestine, Kashmir, or anti-government demonstrations withdraw from perhaps the most important act of civic solidarity this country observes. The capacity for collective action exists. It is simply never exercised when Britain calls for remembrance of its war dead.
The explanation lies not in Islam itself, but in how political Islam has reshaped Muslim identity in Britain. A generation has been taught to see themselves as Muslims who happen to live in Britain, not as British citizens who happen to be Muslim. That distinction shapes every political choice, every act of loyalty, every moment when citizenship calls.
Through this ideological lens, British civic rituals are not neutral acts of remembrance. Political Islam reinterprets them as endorsements of an oppressive state. British military actions become perpetual aggression against the ummah. British history becomes a record of imperial crimes. The poppy transforms from a symbol of sacrifice into an emblem of complicity. Remembrance itself becomes an act of betrayal against fellow Muslims abroad.
This represents a profound severance from historical reality. Over 400,000 Muslim soldiers served the Crown in the First World War alone. Men from the Punjab Regiment, the Frontier Force Regiment, the 5th Gurkha Rifles died at Gallipoli, the Somme, in Burma. The historical thread has been deliberately cut.
Their grandfathers fought for Britain. Their grandchildren will not honour them.
When communities repeatedly avoid the most basic acts of civic participation while demanding recognition and accommodation, it signals a relationship of extraction rather than contribution. They wish to benefit from British society without acknowledging the sacrifices that created their freedom to dissent. They want the rights that 400,000 Muslim soldiers died to defend. To honour them requires nothing more than two minutes of silence.
Political Islam has worked for decades to ensure those two minutes never come. It has cultivated a worldview in which Britishness is incompatible with Muslim loyalty, in which integration is not seen as a civic virtue but as a betrayal of faith. It promotes parallel societies, parallel loyalties, and parallel political narratives.
Remembrance, more than any other moment, exposes the depth of that separation.
This is the poisonous fruit of allowing political Islam to flourish unchallenged in British mosques, schools and community centres. The movement explicitly rejects integration in favour of parallel societies. It teaches young Muslims their primary loyalty belongs not to the country that houses them, but to a global Islamic community that exists primarily as political abstraction.
The absence we see each year is not explained by inconvenience, indifference, or lack of awareness. It is the predictable outcome of an ideological movement that has taught a generation to view British civic rituals not as moments of unity, but as violations of religious loyalty.
Until we confront what political Islam has done to Muslim identity in Britain, until we are willing to speak honestly about how this ideology has uprooted the historical connection between Muslims and this country, we will continue pretending that integration is progressing when, in truth, it is being actively undone.
The silence at Remembrance is not accidental. It is a statement. The question is whether Britain is willing to listen.
Raja Miah MBE
_________
They have tried everything to stop us. We are still here. They believed fear would silence us. They were wrong. Every attempt to punish us has only strengthened our resolve.
And now, as we look across our towns and see entire sections of the community turning away from the most basic acts of British civic life, it becomes even clearer what we are fighting. Not our neighbours. Not people of faith. But an ideology that has taught thousands to stand apart from the country that has given them safety, opportunity, and freedom.
I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs
Today, the same political forces that covered up those crimes are trying to bulldoze the National Inquiry into a whitewash, the same way they look the other way at every sign of civic fracture in our towns.
My question to you is simple: will you stand with me and fight to save the place we all call home?
🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe;
This is the fight.
This is the moment.
There will not be another
🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution?
👉 https://t.co/kvFfhHNJ03
👉 https://t.co/8Og0hDKfjy
No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it.
Raja 🙏
#Vodafone down across the country, and they have the cheek to text me with my next bill! No acknowledgement on any platform from them about the outage, what's caused it or when it might be back, but yeah, here's your bill.....
Sky News Australia host @StevePriceMedia gets it.
His segment on the Islamic terror attack on the peaceful Jewish community in Manchester during Yom Kippur covers every point.
Shame Sky News UK don't talk facts like this.
NOW — Rupert Lowe MP has written directly to the Bank of England’s Deputy Secretary demanding the release of strategy papers and risk assessments on the links between Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) and Digital ID systems.
The Bank recently refused our FOI request, citing a “chilling effect” on deliberations and the risk of “destabilising speculation.”
In his letter, Rupert Lowe makes clear:
- The public interest in transparency on money, privacy and the relationship between citizens and the state far outweighs the supposed risks of public debate.
- Sensitive issues can be published in redacted or summary form, as demonstrated by the Bank’s own research with MIT.
- Parliament and the public deserve clarity on whether digital identity is being linked to programmable currency in government planning.
I am grateful for Rupert’s support in pressing this matter. The British people deserve answers, and @RestoreBritain_ will continue to pursue them.
@Keir_Starmer You talk of "peaceful protest" as if the crowd in Whitehall was defined by the handful who lashed out. Hundreds of thousands marched behind their own flag - families, pensioners, workers - and you smear them all as thugs. Violence is wrong. Nobody serious disputes that. But you twist the acts of a few into a moral cudgel to delegitimise the many. That isn't leadership. It's evasion.
You speak of people "feeling intimidated because of their background or the colour of their skin." Yet it is not Jewish children hounded off buses that concern you. It is not young girls preyed upon by imported grooming gangs. It is not women threatened by men from cultures that see them as chattel. Those victims vanish from your concern. What you mean by "intimidation" is simply the sight of your own countrymen standing up for themselves.
And then your sleight of hand: you claim the Union Jack "represents our diverse country." No. The flag does not represent whatever passing ideology a Prime Minister chooses to drape across it. It represents Britain - its history, its duty, its people. To redefine it as a corporate logo for "diversity and respect" is to strip it of meaning. You say you will never surrender the flag. But you already have - not to Tommy Robinson, not to rallies in Whitehall, but to the very forces that are dismantling the nation beneath it.
That is the truth across the West. In Britain, in America, in Europe, the Left has hollowed out symbols, institutions, and traditions, then handed them over to supranational dogmas and imported loyalties. The flag is reduced to a backdrop for speeches about "tolerance." The police are reduced to political enforcers, indulgent with pro-Palestine mobs yet heavy-handed with patriots. The language of "diversity" becomes a mask for mass immigration that no public ever consented to.
You want to claim the mantle of order, but you preside over disorder. You want to pose as a defender of the flag, but you recast it as a brand for the very policies that betray the people it belongs to. That is why the streets filled. Not because of violence. Not because of extremism. But because the nation knows it has been sold off - piece by piece, principle by principle.
So don't lecture Britain about "never surrendering the flag." You and your kind surrendered it long ago. The question now is not whether people will reclaim it, but when - and whether they can do so peacefully, with discipline, before the anger you have sown breaks the country apart.
"The flag does not represent whatever passing ideology a Prime Minister chooses to drape across it. It represents Britain - its history, its duty, its people."
@natw58 It is so quiet now, you can barely hear them, the sound doesn't carry. I've been BF2 for about 10 years, and I've never heard the stadium as quiet. The away corner has some acoustics though, don't like being able to hear them clearly lol
Interesting insight from Neil McCann. Winners do have strong opinions and that needs managed. He describes Nico Raskin as hard to deal with, opinionated and ill disciplined.
I asked RM about not creating chances and only scoring 3 in opening 4 matches.
He said we actually had more shots than anyone else in league, but we need to get better. We have more quality now and expects more to arrive tomorrow.
🇧🇪 Nicolas Raskin’s situation to be defined by the end of the window.
🟠⚫️🦅 Crystal Palace & Wolverhampton currently the main options.
💰 Rangers FC opened the door for a departure & would accept a loan with an mandatory option.
🏟️ His presence for Old Firm’s in doubt.
👀 One to watch. #CPFC #WWFC