@Nickyqq05@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@leahfiles Candace is very loyal friend & Baron is an attorney who’s most likely done many depositions & knows techiques when he can tell someone is lying. After Baron heard the backstory & watched the interview he wanted to share what he noticed & his expertise.
Exactly i understand being nervous but it really shouldn’t matter when she’s supposed to have 20yrs experience. If she really has that resume & deep knowledge it would’ve shown but it came across like she was faking it. It shouldn’t be that hard talking about what you do for a living.
@WhatTheFekete I definitely think it’s his fault bc even if he genuinely believed she was a fraud it was a poor choice to mention it on a diary of a ceo. Has he never dealt with a scorned women? But, I’m curious to see your take.
i do think there’s a difference when the main people he’s platformed are already well established & he knows his audience will expect them to lie. In Leah’s case Shawn knew he was giving her an opportunity while also having her on bc he was planning it around a multi series flock docuseries. So, if Shawn feels like she’s lying then it matters more bc he knows his audience will trust newcomers he chooses to platform. She didn’t even name names during the interview but he was still pushing back a lot bc he didn’t believe her. I don’t think he was able to verify her background. & im not sure if they would want a unverified source to name names for legal reasons
It could be a psyop. I also heard that Shawn always takes his guests out to eat for dinner or sometimes breakfast to get to know them before the interview so I wonder what happened with that. This whole thing is so strange bc having Leah follow the money on flock when it’s public knowledge & the likelihood that Shawn or his producers didn’t already know or unaware of who was invested in flock prior to Leah has to be zero. Those names are super common. Apparently, Leah’s interview wasn’t isolated & Shawn had been producing a multiseries docuseries on flock at the same time.
@The1Parzival@leahfiles I know she was on TikTok before X & i think you both happened to have the same idea. Bc I checked tiktok & it was on 12/7 called CK deep dive part 1 follow the money & then she started her Tpusa follow the money part 1 on 2/2
After listening to Shawn’s interview with a diary of a ceo I could tell he has a lot of trust issues in general but he does talk about the different people he decided not to air & Leah is one of them. I think for whatever reason as Shawn got to know Leah prior to the interview he had doubts about her past work with the CIA & then started to question her overall credibility. It starts around 32:44
https://t.co/0XPHtjkaYr
I don’t think that Shawn would’ve been complaining about an unnamed female fraud episode he decided not to air on a diary of a ceo if the real reason was that he was trying to protect his investments. It’s actually labeled on the podcast on why he deletes podcasts & he talks about a few of them. He didn’t even have to mention hers.
I don’t think he can or had trouble verifying her background in general. I think with other guests it’s different bc even if they’re lying they’re already well established & he brings them on bc the public wants to see them & in this situation Shawn knew he was about to help Leah until he figured out things weren’t adding up, he probably feels like he owes it to his audience & had to deal with how to handle it.
Maybe it’s a lot easier for Baron to determine what’s happening in this particular situation because he had a backstory. Baron is an attorney who’s done many depositions & he may have learned some techniques while getting to fire off questions. I can’t think of another situation where Baron would’ve failed to examine someone.
It’s completely different bc those guests are already well established & some we expect to lie whereas here this was a big opportunity for her & Shawn knew he was about to play a role in helping Leah until he noticed she was full of it. I’m sure he feels responsible for his audience & had to decide on how to handle it. I know this isn’t the first time he’s chosen not to air an interview.
Tyler Robinson's main Google account address—cited in Charlie Kirk search warrants was last modified on 10/18/2026—that's 2 DAYS AGO 👀
Just like furaffinity account, this is evidence SOMEONE ELSE HAS HAD USER-ACCESS to "Tyler's" online identity.
This is also his Apple ID. 👀
@samsfamreacts This would be my guess also. I wonder if this has to do with Shawn being addicted to adrenaline from having a dangerous job & how a constant need for crisis might equate to chaotic management.
I think more people paid attention to her bc she starts every video with the same catch phrase of the 5 different agencies she’s worked at but after watching her on Shawn Ryan I couldn’t help but question if she actually has that much experience & that maybe she was using it as a way to become more visible but I could be wrong. I also watched Baron Coleman explain techniques Shawn Ryan may have used to tell if she was lying & it made me wonder.
I know when you have truth & knowledge on your side it shows & something was off like she was winging it or not being fully honest. Not saying she is a total fraud but who knows maybe she lied about her experience to get more attention. Shawn couldn’t verify her background so he had to use other techniques to tell if she was lying. Baron Coleman really did a good job breaking down how Shawn might’ve been checking for lies.
@Keats_90@Ft_Banana_Snow Gross Danks is one of those guys & he even said how the girl should respond by winking. Ew complete dirtbag. I always felt something was off about him.
@IanCarrollShow@ShawnRyan762 During the interview Shawn mentions not liking to name names & then said fuck it & said dc draino so its even weirder because he’s showing he doesn’t care.