Michael Schomisch

[Jake Shields @jakeshieldsajj]

Retweet if your think @elonmusk should allow Thomas Rousseau of Patriot Front on Twitter

He has never broken any rules or pushed for violence

[Joshua Haymes @haymes_joshua]

Women dressing & behaving like whores will quite literally lead to civilizational suicide.

We must stigmatize and publicly shame shameful behavior.

Jesus Christ can save and forgive, but a healthy society stigmatizes, wicked behavior, such that the masses never participate in the destructive behavior to begin with.

We must make righteous social stigma great again.

[Gregory K Bovino @GregoryKBovino]

If AI is about to replace most jobs, why are we still importing anyone?

The Chamber of Commerce wants cheap labor that robots will soon do better. We’re screwing American workers and importing millions more who’ll also get wiped out by AI.

This is a doomsday machine.

Mass deportations and a total stop to immigration is the only sane move left.

Denaturalizations too!!!

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Islam is evil. Obviously. All demonic religions are. And Islam has a long history of unfathomable violence everywhere it goes, and has plagued Christianity for as long as it's existed. That's why I've advocated for an end to not just Muslim Mass Migration, but ALL Muslim migration to the West. We're full.

That said, when we talk about a systemic campaign of anti-Christian persecution and the organized harassment of Christianity in Israel, people bring up Hezbollah. Talk about Israelis who keep spitting on Christians, you'll be asked about Hamas. It's pathological. It's intentional. The "what-aboutism" is a part of a very intentional public marketing campaign, because if you're thinking about Islam, you're not thinking about Israel.

The reason Israel gets talked about - other than that we aren't subsidizing Hamas or Hezbollah with our tax dollars (much) - there's another, more Biblical reason:

We're told in the Bible to shoulder the burdens of our fellow CHRISTIANS (Galatians 6:2) - not unbelieving Jews, not pagans, not Muslims. But, CHRISTIANS. And the Christians in Gaza aren't as worried about Hamas. They're worried about Israel. And they are *substantially* more worried about Israel. And that makes sense, because Israel has murdered waaaaay more innocent people - including Christians - than Hamas ever dreamed about.

But it's not just about bombing Christian churches for no discernible reason and killing nuns with sniper fire. The indigenous Christians in Israel face treatment at the hands of Israelis that no Christian on Earth should have to endure. Yes, they get treated worse in Nigeria. We're not funding Boko Haram or providing them missiles to shoot at churches during worship. We're funding Israel.

When I made a comment on Tucker about the Ottoman Millet system, comparing Ottoman and Israeli treatment of Christians in Palestine, it caused a small uproar. Some alleged things I did not, in fact, say. Others assumed my intentions were to minimize Islam's evils, whitewash history, paint Muslims as misunderstood angels, or outright deny Islamic atrocities in other places or eras.

The thing is, as one prominent critic reluctantly admitted in the first few minutes of his rather lengthy diatribe, my claim was, "technically accurate." I'll translate: "Technically" means "inconveniently." It gives history a wrinkle, and we like history to be flat. We don't like our historic facts with asterisks. And, I provide all the receipts in this article, down to the last detail, in careful footnotes with links to see the evidence for yourselves.

The case is simple: Out of geopolitical pragmatism, the Ottomans' Status Quo was adopted by most of Europe and retained long after the empire ended. The system it produced made Europe hesitant to support a Jewish state because it worked for Christians. It was functional, and most sides were content, and so content, they didn't want to mess it up. Their philosophy was simple: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

While the Ottomans were genocidal outside of Palestine, they recognized the tinderbox that the Holy Land could easily become and treated it differently. So no, they didn't tax churches. While they taxed Christians a special tax, it purchased privileges unavailable to everyone else. Christians didn't have to enlist in the Ottoman and Muslim army. They couldn't be dragged into Sharia courts. Christian communities were given local autonomy for their community government.

They weren't "equal" citizens in the sense of a liberal democracy in the 21st Century, and they couldn't carry weapons - but neither can the British. That tax was collected by the church leaders, with the right to exempt the elderly, children, widows, and the disabled. And it also protected them under imperial decree, forbidding anyone from laying a finger on their head under threat of bodily punishment and fine. Pilgrims were off limits and protected by Janissary guards. And the Ottomans' firmans and capitulations structured a legal system giving Holy Sites' upkeep and repair imperial sanction, permanent protection, and a mechanism to fund it. In certain cases, like the 1868 repair of the rotunda roof of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, they even contributed to its renovation.

This is in contrast to their regime of terror generally everywhere else, and compared to anywhere else in the world where people were conquered, even in Christian empires, God preserved and protected Christians in the Promised Land from those who otherwise ran a brutal regime.

That's it. That's the argument. And those facts are helpful when answering a question. The question is why the Ottomans inherited Palestine with 20% Christians in 1517, and passed it off to the British in 1917 with 20% Christians, their population steady. Then, the Israelis took it from the British in 1948 with 20% Christians. Why, after 77 years, has the Christian population in Israel - that remained steady for four centuries - suddenly collapsed to 2%?

That type of economic collapse is usually associated with ethnic cleansing and the Bubonic plague. By comparison to modern Israel, the Millet System is a good apples-to-apples comparison to figure out what went wrong. Recently, churches were told they had "back taxes" to pay - which they haven't paid in 17 centuries - totaling millions of dollars. When they couldn't afford it, their bank accounts were frozen and they were threatened with land confiscation. Christians are spit on in the streets. Jewish arsonists burn down churches, and police don't respond to calls for emergency services or prosecute the criminals. The Lehava and La Famlia gangs engage in organized violence against Christians. Clergy were turned away from church on Easter.

And, despite not hearing it in American media, all the major church denominations are complaining about holy sites falling into disrepair. Despite making billions from Christian tourism, the Israeli Dept of Tourism isn't funding upkeep for Christian sites. Christians are fleeing. And in the polls of those leaving, they're placing the blame on their treatment at the hands of Israel, or the economic collapse caused by the Gaza genocide.

I didn't invent the claim that they had it better under the Millet System. That's a charge made in an official statement from the indigenous denominations of Israel, who've been there since before even the Ottomans ruled. They'd know.

So, why can't someone who has been outspoken about the evil of Islam, the one who raised the biggest stink about Russell Moore's mosque-building efforts, who advocates for NO Islamic migration, and doesn't quibble about Islamic atrocities, mention a single historic caveat about a historic reality? The answer is, it's not allowed.

It's not political propaganda. It's religious. It's rabbinic. The Talmud and Rabbinic teachings deny - in no uncertain terms - Imago Dei. The difference between the Christian belief in this doctrine and the Jewish denial is one of the biggest, most fundamental differences between our two religions. It's one of the reasons that a "shared religious heritage" is pure myth. We believe people can *become* evil. Jews believe the goyim are *ontologically* evil. That's the difference.

In order for YOU to support THEIR behavior, you need to accept THEIR religious suppositions. History must remain flattened for this to succeed. Stereotypes must not be questioned. Exceptions must not be thought possible. Islam must not only be evil, but Muslims must also be evil, and ALL Muslims must be evil (including the ones who don’t know what Islam is because they’re tiny and still have their baby teeth). Even our Christian hope that their souls are salvageable must be discarded as a dangerous thought.

Muslims must not only be evil, but they must also be as evil as humanly possible. Any fact or data point that could make them be perceived as less evil might lead to someone asking, “Why did you bomb that apartment building of 300 people to kill one guy?”

If Muslims are not ontologically evil, from birth, and irreparable and unsavable, it will lead you to question why the IDF's "Daddy's Home" targeting system waits for them to get home to kill their wife and kids, too, before firing. It will lead you to ask why they've killed more children than adults. They don't want you asking.

Muslims, for this Israeli propaganda op to work, must have a complete monopoly on evil. Because if they don't, then maybe some of that evil is shared by Israel, too. That is why any attempt to say, "Hold on a minute. It didn't always used to be like this in Palestine," is met with accusations of being some kind of "Islamic Apologist."

If there was a time when there was an imperfect system, with imperfect people, that still functioned better for Christians than what exists under the Israelis now, then that means there are reasons for the current chaos and an explanation for the hellscape that is currently the Middle East. That's more complicated than Israelis want it to be.

If history is complicated, then so too is the present. And Americans thinking through things carefully is not in the Israelis' best interests.

Read more at Insight to Incite. Link in bio. Audio available.

[Grace Chong, MBI @gc22gc]

BOVINO: The regular run of the mill illegal alien is far more of a threat than the terrorists and criminal aliens.

They’re going to vote us out. They’re going to outbreed us.

Our culture, national identity, values, and traditions are at stake.

We need them all gone at the same time.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

They're not freezing your rent, they're freezing your housing providers' income, while their expenses keep increasing.

The point isn't to make your housing affordable, it's to make providing housing financially inviable, so government(s) can seize the unmanageable properties.

Our lack of financial literacy is going to destroy us.
https://t.co/Eix9fVp1BK

[BanksyCat @Banksycat]

They told us handcuffing Henry Nowak made NO difference. A combat medicine doctor just CONTRADICTED that. He says the handcuffs didn't change nothing, they CHANGED EVERYTHING. Henry Nowak could have LIVED. THREE MINUTES after they cuffed him, he was DEAD.

Here’s what some of the new transcript actually shows.

Three minutes in, the male officer says he's not breathing. Cuffs off. CPR starts. “Come on. I got you.” Mate. Bro. Genuinely trying.

Then he whispers, “He's fu*cking gone. Blood's coming out his nose.” Keeps going anyway.

Eight minutes after Henry told them, same officer, hands still mid compression. “He's got a stab. I'm pushing on a fucking stab wound.”

He didn't get told. He FELT it. Under his own hands.

That makes it worse, he says. It does. Now he knows exactly what they missed for eight minutes, and his own hands just proved it.

The female officer who found it replies. “It's fine. It's not coming out. It's fine. Keep going. Keep going. It's not bleeding out.”

She's just confirmed an active stab wound on a dying boy. Her response is to talk it down.

Gurpreet's 999 call told the operator Henry needed medical attention. They turned up with CUFFS. The operator asked once about injuries, heard bleeding from the mouth, moved on. Asked THREE TIMES what racist thing was said. “That's what I needed to know.” One word outweighed a dying boy.

Henry told them himself. With his own mouth. Conscious. Clear. “I’ve been stabbed.”

The reply. “Don't think you have, mate.”

Not “let me check.” Not “show me.” A flat dismissal, because the man who'd put the knife in him got there first with a different story.

Henry was the one in cuffs. The man holding the actual KNIFE wasn't cuffed at all.

They wrenched his arms back to cuff him. The exact motion a critical care doctor says tore the clot holding his bleed shut.

Dr Magier didn't need a courtroom. Just a phone and a post mortem. Chest stab wounds kill under 5% of the time. One London trauma centre, 938 cases, under 1%. Even Henry's exact wound, the subclavian vein, is a coin flip if help's close. He wasn't unreachable, he was THREE MINUTES from a major trauma centre, conscious enough to speak in full sentences when they arrived.

The pathologist told the court none of that mattered. The judge repeated it at sentencing like it closed the case.

It didn't close anything. Bought three weeks, until a paediatrician on the Isle of Wight read the numbers out loud and the coroner ordered a jury inquest the next day.

Think about the sequence again, slowly. A boy is bleeding out. He tells the police the TRUTH. They believe the man who lied. They restrain the boy telling the truth. They check for the knife wound eight minutes later, almost as an afterthought, with a torch someone had to be asked twice to fetch.

Three days after he died, Hampshire Police drafted a statement calling Henry the AGGRESSOR. His parents stopped them. They did it AGAIN at the tribute stage. TWICE. CPS stepped in a third time, mid trial, warning them they were about to collapse their own murder case.

Four people built that lie around Henry's dying body. His mother walked off with the weapon. Convicted of assisting an offender, sentenced next month. His brother lied live on the 999 call, his father helped remove the knife at the scene, both now facing charges. Not for the lie that killed Henry. For a stash of weapons found at their house the next day. Twenty two charges between the three of them. None for the thing that actually mattered.

The officers who cuffed him. Six months on, still treated as witnesses, not suspects. Three no longer on front-line duties. One's already left the force, for an unrelated reason, apparently. IOPC investigation remains open.

Hampshire's own Police and Crime Commissioner said it plainly. He was not believed. He was not treated as a victim. Those words should have triggered an immediate and urgent medical response.

While a doctor laid out the numbers proving Henry had a real chance, Keir Starmer told the country there's NO two tier policing in Britain.

This isn't a story about one bad shift. It's a story about an institution trained to manage a narrative before it's trained to save a life. All 43 chief constables in England and Wales signed up to that guidance. Hampshire alone spent £861,737 making officers sit through it.

Henry Nowak gave them everything he had left. His voice. His account. His own diagnosis, spoken out loud while he still could.

They gave him eight minutes and a torch.

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

I've been inundated with questions the last 24 hours about the difference between Christianity and "Judeo-Christianity," and between historic Covenant Theology and Dispensational Zionism. And while I'm super thankful for that, it's downright impossible to answer all of them. The thing is, I've already written a virtual mountain on those topics over the last year and a half.

The problem is, they're all behind the paywall at I2I. Not everybody can afford a few extra bucks a month, but they need answers. So, I figure the best way I can praise God for the opportunity to tell so many people about Him on Tucker, is just to go ahead and make it all FREE for EVERYONE.

Everything. Everything, at least, dealing with the topic of Israel, "Judeo-Christianity," Judaism, Covenant Theology, "Anti-Semitism," ALL OF IT. Go get it. Free of charge.

Heirs of the Promise - a 7-week Bible study explaining Covenant Theology straight from the pages of Sacred Writ, written for the layman, easy to understand, and digestible, with a workbook, discussion questions, and study helps to better understand the Word of God about who truly are God's chosen people.

Endecktes Judenthum (Judaism Unmasked) by Johann Eisenmenger, and Endecktes Judenthum for Dummies - the most censored book in Western history, a complete unveiling of what the Talmud really teaches, and its companion, making the 2k pages of Eisenmenger's work understandable and categorized into a 9-section Cliff's Notes version for easy understanding.

Critiquing Christian Antisemitism - my response to Dr. Michael Brown's book, Israeli propaganda disguised as "theology," which attacked the church fathers and aims to silence Christians with charges of "antisemitism." A chapter-by-chapter refutation in defense of Covenant Theology.

A Rubbish Heap of Harlots - John Chrysostom's six-part sermon series "Against the Jews," directly from the mouth of the Church Father, battling the Judaizing Heresy, and translated to plain English with an assortment of helpful explanations.

ALL FREE. ALL FOR YOU.

Follow the link in my bio, and then start downloading. Also, I've provided an opportunity to get a free hardback copy of our Amazon Best-Seller, "Hyphenated Heresy."

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

I HAVE LITERALLY SEEN MORE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM ON THE DAMN REFLECTING POOL...

...THAN ALL JOURNALISM DONE BY ALL MEDIA ON ALL FRAUD COMBINED!!!!!

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

A historic bait-and-switch that the "Judeo-Christians" often try (like Mike Huckabee recently) is to argue that the United States has a "Jewish founding" because the Founders often appealed to the Old Testament. But this requires conceding that the Old Testament is a Jewish book. It isn't.

The Old Testament is a Christian book. It's the intellectual property of God's chosen people (1 Peter 2:9), His Covenant Community, the legitimate heirs of God's promises (Galatians 3:29), the Children of Abraham (Galatians 3:7). Christians, in other words. It belongs to the people who believe it.

Moses and the prophets wrote of Jesus (Luke 24:27, 44). Believing in Jesus is the only means by which the Old Testament can be properly understood (2 Corinthians 3:14-16). Unbelieving Jews don't even believe in Moses's Law or the Holy Scriptures (John 5:46). If they did, they'd be Christians.

The Founders of the United States weren't reaching for the Torah or Tenakh in Hebrew when they cited it in their writings. They were using the Bible taught in Christian Churches by Christian clergy, with Christian scholarship and interpretation. Specifically, the Founders used the KVJ. Which brings up an interesting historical caveat...

Did you know that almost no Jews in colonial America (what few there were) could read their own Scriptures in Hebrew? Modern Hebrew, which isn't really Hebrew (it's about as far from actual Hebrew as Pig Latin is from Latin) wasn't invented yet. Most Jews had not read Hebrew in thousands of years. In fact, Jesus didn't even read the Bible in Hebrew, but instead, used the Greek Septuagint. Some very educated Jews in Colonial America, Rabbis perhaps, could read the Aramaic Targrums, but few. There was no Jewish English translation before 1853.

What did they read? Believe it or not, Jews in colonial America read the King James Bible. How's that for irony? They had to use the Christian Bible, while ignoring the part in the back of the Book. Which is sad, because that's the best part, and explains how you interpret the front.

In 1854, Isaac Leeser founded the first Jewish press and put the Tenakh in English for the first time. He lamented that Jews had to rely on "a deceased King of England, who was certainly no prophet, for the correct understanding of Scripture."

And get this, Leeser even claimed there was a KJV CoNSpiRAcY theory to put Jesus all over the Old Testament, saying, "Whenever it was possible for the translators to introduce Christianity into the Scriptures, they have uniformly done so in order to assail Israel's hopes and faith."

Of course, God's the one who put Jesus all over the Old Testament. It appears Leeser read the Bible for the first time and thought, "What the heck. Why's Jesus all over the place?" Answer: It's literally about Him.

Imagine that, friends. America wasn't founded on the "Jewish" religion. But American Judaism WAS founded on the Christian Bible. That's top-shelf irony, right there. You'd think they'd be more appreciative of borrowing our Scripture.

[Michael Schomisch @mcschomisch]

If the UK doesn’t absolutely explode over this they are done as a country.

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

Fucking hell this is dark.

[Michael Schomisch @mcschomisch]

@DANY77710263 @RobertoAvventu2 @grok can you translate the caption in this post to English

[Gregory K Bovino @GregoryKBovino]

Here at Vlad the Impaler’s tomb…

Folks, this reminds me that cultures have historically been marred by illegal aliens.

One moment you’re enjoying your hard fought societal traditions and values, the next invaders decide your land and your people should look like theirs.

The Prince of Walachia wasn’t some cartoon villain, he was a great hero to his people.

When the Turks came rolling in, he did what was necessary to protect his culture and way of life.

Sometimes the only thing standing between your civilization and the next wave of invaders is a motivated PATRIOT willing to do what it takes. Respect
@nicksortor @StephenM @LaurenWitzkeDE @GavinNewsom @JBPritzker @ZohranKMamdani

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Section 219 (was 224) of the NDAA contains a dangerous provision to integrate our military tech with Israel’s.

@RepRoKhanna & I submitted an amendment to strike 219. I included the Rules Committee roster here; 7 of 13 members must agree in order for our amendment to get a vote.

[Michael Schomisch @mcschomisch]

@elonmusk @elonmusk X-TV Prime??

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

This article is URGENT and has HUGELY important info.

Israel-First influencers are quick to tell you that the 3.8 billion in annual military aid to Israel is set to sunset. What they are NOT telling you is that in two days, Congress is set to GIVE the future U.S. military to Israel. They're going to get WAY MORE than 3.8 billion dollars. They're being given the keys, and what they'll get out of it is worth more than every jet, tank, carrier, and warship COMBINED.

AIPAC assets in Congress have snuck Section 224 into the National Defense Authorization Act to be voted on Thursday. It's titled the "United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.” And what it will do is give Israel full ownership and access into U.S. military research, development, and production of 6 emerging war technologies:

1. Artificial intelligence and autonomous systems
2. Quantum computing
3. Cybersecurity and full data network integration
4. Directed energy weapons
5. Counter-unmanned systems
6. Biotechnology

These are not legacy weapons. These are all MORE valuable than aircraft carrier strike groups. These are the six domains that every serious defense analyst alive agrees will determine who wins the next major war. The F-35s are already depreciating. The drone swarms over Iran just proved it. What Section 224 transfers is the inheritance - the technology that replaces everything we have now - co-developed with a foreign government from the research stage forward, meaning Israel gets inside the architecture before a single weapon is ever deployed.

When your AI targeting system is jointly built with Israel, Israel understands its vulnerabilities before it fires. When your cyber defense network is fused with Israeli intelligence infrastructure by statute, that access doesn't disappear if the relationship ever sours. It's baked into the hardware.

And once Israeli co-production plants are running in congressional districts across the country, opposing Israeli foreign policy becomes functionally identical to opposing American military readiness. That's the point. That's the trap.

Thomas Massie promised to strip it from the bill on the floor. He wrote three words: "We are a sovereign country." AIPAC immediately called him an "antisemite" and spent $32 million removing him before he could cast the vote.

Congress has heard the will of the American people, who do NOT want to keep funding Israel's genocide of Gaza and their religious wars of conquest. It responded by just giving away America's future military infrastructure and planting Israel's war industry in your congressional district to force your congressman to answer to Tel Aviv.

A few months ago, Bill Mitchell tweeted, "I don't understand the anti-Israel forces. Do they think by complaining about Israel 24/7 on X, they are going to change US policy towards Israel? Republican or Democrat president, America will NEVER abandon Israel."

I said at the time that informing Americans that we aren't in political control of whether or not we support Israel or how much money we give them is how pogroms happen. Sadly, maybe he's right. We said no more funding. The U.S. Congress is trying to give them our entire military's future on a silver platter.

Read more at Insight to Incite. Link in bio. Audio version available.

[Michael T. Lester @MichaelTLester]

Congress just dishonored every American veteran.

I served in the U.S. Marine Corps. I dedicated years of my life to this country, our way of life, and our beliefs. I lost friends. I watched wives hold their babies and choke back tears at my friends' funerals.

For that sacrifice, our country recognizes service members. They can proudly say "I served" and carry the title of Veteran.

Now Congress wants to grant that same recognition to service in a foreign military, for the sole benefit of that foreign country, in an ongoing military action being investigated for war crimes against civilians.

That cheapens every veteran's sacrifice. It undermines the honor of military service. And it dishonors this country.

Repost this. Americans need to know. Veterans need to know. The families of service members and veterans need to know. And Congress needs to know we are not ok with this.

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

A very sad announcement.

I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.

In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.

Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.

In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.

Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.

Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."

You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.

Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.

The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.

Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.

Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.

If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.

If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.

[Michael Schomisch @mcschomisch]

@AwakenedOutlaw @drawandstrike I’m all about conspiracy theories but this looks more they applied a filter to make him look less like a talking ball sack and the AI didn’t know what to do with his neck choad. Or it’s a distraction from the ones that really wear a mask. Fox heavily filters anchors faces.