@MagnitudeReview@Clio_the_Leo@alsopeterbrown@CBSBigBrother Right?? Where does Survivor do it's after show?? I couldn't believe it was a black curtain, couple row of chairs and terrible lighting. Should have had Mallory exit, break to commercial as she's golf cart driven to the bigger location with the full audience. It was weird.
@EricDawelder@TheDude_Xx@cabisbee It's not a legal name change? Look up the rules for changing the name of shared international bodies of water....
Or listen to Bill explain it to ya
https://t.co/CkC7TIvIIu
@cabisbee 40 million Canadians *and the rest of the world.... also majority of Americans lol good thing that name change followed the law and fixed the trade war ππ
@Takhar77@rbbq I saw a post from someone else that she promised to also not nominate him and he wouldn't nominate her in exchange for the 5k. It didn't mention he agreed not to nominate any icon.
@wujukrystal@avery_kathryn_@BB_Updates Because it's way easier to beat Angela in the next HoH and they can be in control themselves. Kamu could switch it up any time and will be harder to get out and beat the further they get in the game.
@tayvisfatigue@ToomsBB_ You probably can't offer the bribe to someone for something you'd already been discussing. If she had offered it before he brought up using it on her, then she could probably give it to him.
@Nathan_Mason123@EricLDaugh This was the first thing I thought too. They've likely been deployed and want to have a job where they can be with their family? Why would they want to again have to leave and work on the road? I'm sure some will enjoy this work but it's definitely not for the majority
@tdsfixer@Patrickwebb They were able to travel, buy a car and a home etc. Today's expenses were spent elsewhere back then and also likely money was put away for retirement.
@RyanLongston2@premkamboj@Robberkarma They threw a water bottle at his car and he thought they had also pulled out a gun and shot at him. They didn't but he fired at them because he thought it was a gunshot.
@_Shobayo1@IamFidgell@nocontextfooty I've learned that it's not that he ducked away, he obviously didn't, but that he didn't have control of the ball so it's considered a deflection which isn't intentional according to FIFA rules. Wild but the defender not having control makes the contact unintentional
@sfrench49 I've learned that because the ref decided that Portugal player wasn't intending to play the ball, it's an 'accidental touch' and doesn't count in terms of possession etc. The apparent last touch by Croatia (which you can't see but the ball sensor went off π€·ββοΈ) counts so offside
@gopricette@1blueshirtgirl@WhiteHouse Where is the evidence of it losing that money? This seems like a propaganda talking point that no one is providing evidence of.