Hello @TeamYouTube,
I’m respectfully requesting a real person or specialist to manually review my channel, ScalingStories, after being denied monetization for “inauthentic content.”
YouTube describes inauthentic content as content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value. I understand why that policy exists, but I genuinely do not believe it describes my channel.
My videos are not automated, mass-produced, or minimally transformed. Every video is voiced by me, manually edited by me in DaVinci Resolve, and uses gameplay that I play and record myself. I also use custom-drawn avatars during my talking segments to represent myself, add personality, and better express the emotions and reactions I am sharing with my viewers.
The value of my videos is not just the stories themselves. I add my own commentary, reactions, opinions, explanations, and perspective throughout the video. I try to make each video entertaining, thoughtful, and useful for my audience. Viewers frequently respond to my voiceovers and thoughts, which shows they are engaging with me as the creator, not just the source material.
My channel may have a consistent format, but a consistent format is not the same as repeated content. The only repeated elements are things like my intro and outro, which YouTube’s own guidelines say are allowed when the bulk of the content is different.
After I was removed from the Partner Program on January 27, 2026, I spent three months reviewing the guidelines, deleting more than 1,000 older videos, and rebuilding my channel with YouTube’s policies in mind. I reapplied with newer content on my channel, but was still denied for the same reason.
I truly believe the current content on my channel follows YouTube’s guidelines. I am not asking for special treatment. I am only asking for a fair manual review with the full context of how my videos are made and transformed.
My channel: https://t.co/mj9N7Ez9qi
@Dearme2_ Funny I make 15 an hour and my friend at a corporate job makes 13 😂😂 I think I’ll keep my fast food job until I can find something that pays more
Hello @TeamYouTube@YouTube@YouTubeCreators@nealmohan@UpdatesFromYT,
I am trying my hardest to get a real person to review my channel, ScalingStories, and watch my appeal/behind-the-scenes video with the full context of how my content is made.
My channel was demonetized for “inauthentic content,” but I genuinely believe that label does not reflect my work. I understand why YouTube has policies against mass-produced, repetitive, automated, or minimally transformed content. I respect those rules, and I would never want to build my channel in a way that goes against them.
But my videos are not automated, low-effort, or mass-produced. They are voiced by me, edited by me, and built around my own commentary, reactions, and personal perspective. I record my own gameplay/background footage, manually edit in DaVinci Resolve, and use custom avatars to represent myself while speaking to my viewers.
I do not simply read stories and upload them. I add my thoughts throughout the video, explain my perspective, react to the choices being made, and try to make the content entertaining, thoughtful, and useful for my audience. My viewers directly respond to my commentary in the comments, which shows they are engaging with my personal contribution, not just the original story.
I also made a behind-the-scenes video showing my process because I wanted to demonstrate that this is real, manual work. I am a genuine creator who cares deeply about the community I have built, and even after being demonetized, I have continued making videos because I do not want to let my viewers down.
I am not asking for special treatment. I am just asking for a fair manual review from someone who can look at my actual content, watch my appeal video, and determine whether my channel truly fits the “inauthentic content” policy.
Please help me get ScalingStories reviewed by a real person.
Channel: https://t.co/1uIjA6VPmi
Behind-the-scenes video showing my process:
https://t.co/8l9lgqH7Ml
#inauthenticcontent #youtube #youtubedemonetization #creatorsupport #youtubecreators #contentcreator #monetization #youtubepartner #fairreview #fixyoutube
Hello @YouTube@TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators,
I’m sorry to keep tagging you, but I believe my channel was falsely flagged for inauthentic content, and I am requesting assistance from a real human/specialist to manually review it.
I already tried appealing with a video explaining and showcasing my work behind the scenes, including webcam footage to show that I am a real and genuine creator. However, that appeal video still has 0 views, yet the appeal was ruled as confirmed inauthentic content. I believe this may have been done automatically by AI, and I urgently need a manual review by a real person.
Every video on my channel is voiced by me. All gameplay footage was also recorded by me. I provide significant commentary in my videos that adds entertainment and educational value. I also use numerous custom avatars to represent myself during talking segments and to express different emotions and tones to my viewers. None of my videos are mass-produced or repetitive. My viewers can clearly tell that each video is different.
I understand that you receive a large number of appeals and requests every day, and I am simply trying my best to be noticed as well by creating this post.
My channel: https://t.co/rfIa8AXk0M
Hello @YouTube@YouTubeCreators@TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”
My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.
The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”
I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”
I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.
To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.
My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM
@Loliyagreen@halojeane This is a crazy take I was raped by my boyfriend while super intoxicated and I didn’t realize it was rape until later the next day I stayed with him for a few hours after bc I was so conflicted on how I felt and wasn’t sure if I was just too drunk not remembering it right
The vampires' hypnotic eyes in Sinners (2025) were achieved mostly in-camera. Special contact lenses were designed to reflect light and "color-shift" from green-blue to orange-rust based on the lighting, creating a shimmering, inhuman effect.
@Rikuskeyblade9@JerseyRaiders@queenie4rmnola Cause they don’t want to acknowledge that they’re more violent then anybody else. #1 in rape #1 in pedophilia #1 in sexually abusing children #1 in aggravated assault #1 in theft #1 in drug abuse. Like stfu bro 😭
Keith Porter’s murder wasn’t captured on camera, so it’s allowing ICE to sweep it under the rug, but we need to keep talking about him just as much as we talk about Renee Good and Alex Pretti. None of us are safe from this campaign of state violence.
BREAKING: A new video of ICE murdering the man in Minneapolis today shows a clear view of what happened from the front angle.
If anyone has the identities of the ice agents who shot this man, please DM me.
The apparently innocent man, who had a license to carry a firearm was merely recording ICE agents, and then ICE began pepper-spraying a young woman next to him. The man then goes to try and pull the young woman to safety when ICE tackles him.
Then multiple agents begin beating on him before shooting and killing him.
This is cold blooded murder!