"06 years ago, wife went missing.
Now my minor daughter is missing."
"Daughter had already been a victim of sexual assault. I'll die by suic**de if.."
Sanjay Pandey is crying and begging for justice in front of media and Varanasi police. Terrifying! Law and order in UP is dead.
Minimum Recharge to talk with someone on Call in 2014
- Rupees 10
Minimum Recharge to talk with someone on Call in 2025
- Rupees 199
No one is speaking about this Open loot.
Men kill women when they can’t control them. She had literally run away to her grandmother’s. He assaulted her father and took her away with him forcefully and ultimately killed her by hitting her with an iron rod and smashing her head against a wall. But, let’s get real, it’s her fault for choosing this guy, isn’t it? That’s why nobody is treating this brutal murder or this woman and so many before her as they should. Because the only punishment for killing someone should be death penalty. You don’t get to rob someone of their life and continue to keep yours. No. Men who kill women they feel entitled to “own” should not be allowed to breathe again.
Upasana’s advice is being criticised for not matching her own life story, but that criticism misunderstands something fundamental. Life experience changes people. She didn’t speak as the 23-year-old who got married. She spoke as the 36-year-old who has lived, worked, struggled, matured, and understands what today’s young women face. Her privilege allowed her to marry young without risking financial dependence or personal identity. Most women do not have that luxury. Early marriage for an average girl often means early compromise. That is not hypocrisy on her part. That is hindsight, and hindsight is allowed to be wiser.
Egg freezing is being treated like a fraudulent promise when in truth, it was never sold as a guarantee. It is a choice, and choice is the rarest currency women have. A chance, even a small one, is still better than the suffocating fear of running out of time. When men have decades to decide on fatherhood but women have a biological countdown running in their ears from their twenties, giving them one more option is not misleading them. It is empowering them.
The idea that focusing on wealth first destroys health and relationships is a beautiful sentiment and a terrible reflection of reality. What destroys relationships far more aggressively is dependency. Women who are financially secure walk into marriage with dignity, with negotiation power, with the ability to walk away from harm, and with the freedom to choose love rather than survival. Building yourself is not selfish. It is the foundation of every healthy relationship.
Yes, she is not the average woman. And that is precisely why she is trying to speak to the average woman. If most women follow the fairytale advice of marrying young and figuring the rest out later, they won’t land in a multimillion-rupee home with staff, stability, and family support. They will land in a life where dreams are paused indefinitely, where careers are constantly negotiated, and where freedom is often sacrificed silently. Her message isn’t about imitation. It’s about protection.
The romantic idea that marriage and career grow together effortlessly is lovely for stories and rare in practice. In most Indian households, a woman’s career bends around marriage, childcare, relocation, expectations, and unpaid domestic labour. Men simply do not face the same biological or social clocks. A woman who invests in herself before marriage isn’t rejecting companionship. She is ensuring equality within it.
Motherhood is indeed time-bound. But so is career progression. So is the financial window where a woman can set herself up for the future. Relationships do not evaporate after 30, but confidence often does when women are taught to fear “being too late.” Upasana wasn’t telling women to delay life until nothing is left. She was telling them not to panic into choices that shape their entire adulthood.
She didn’t waste an opportunity. She used it courageously. Instead of repeating the tired old script that marriage must come first, she told a generation to become whole, stable, self-aware, and self-sufficient before trying to build a life with someone else. She didn’t push women away from marriage. She pushed them away from fear.
Marriage is beautiful. Motherhood is sacred. But a woman is more than her deadlines. She deserves a life designed consciously, not dictated by panic or pressure. If choosing herself first allows even one woman to enter marriage with strength and not desperation, then the message is not just valid. It is necessary.
This isn’t a war between career and companionship. It is a call to choose clarity over chaos, agency over anxiety, and selfhood over societal timelines. That is all she was saying.
The 14th day is nearly over but Indian police still can't catch the Sanskari Pedophile Shashi Bhushan Upadhyay.
Why is India not asking the most obvious question, who is protecting this man?
The most pathetic thing about this petition is that it has been filed by a WOMAN named Indira Jaising.
If you aren’t familiar with her, she’s the same woman who publicly urged Nirbhaya’s mother to forgive the convicts.
i can't believe men are upset about this. you all joke about the most egregious shit ever and then a woman goes "lol balding" and you all lose your shit. get a grip
So, a girl can't drink alcohol at 16.
She can't drive a car at 16.
She can't vote at 16.
She can't marry at 16.
But, our "HONORABLE" Supreme Court is going to deliberate if she can have sex at 16.
What do these SC judges deserve?
If ‘sexual autonomy’ is their argument to legalise sex with 16 year old, then why stop at 16? Why not 15. 14? 9?
The moment you allow it, you are encouraging content makers to sexualise teens, particularly school-going children
My views at @ShivaniGupta_5’s show on @CNNnews18
A 32- year old jobless pervert piece of shit named Ramkesh Meena got into a problematic relationship with a girl 11 years younger than him!!
When she broke up - he then blackmailed the 21 year old forensic science student with a bright future with videos he recorded WITHOUT her consent and refused to delete when asked.
When the pervert’s hard disk was investigated- the police found videos of AT LEAST 15 more women.
Where was she supposed to go?
To police that rapes victims?
To courts that sets rapists free?
To society that shames you?
So before you blame the girl ask why she felt she had no other choice but to take a step that would ruin her life? Over a mistake that wasn’t even hers!
Media framing is such a huge issue, because why is this framed as though the woman’s leaving mid argument is why this man killed his daughters? The media is a huge part of why society continues to blame women and girls for the violence of the average man.
Why exactly is this a 'shocker'? Blaming women & shamming victims are subjects we specialize in. Actual shocker would be when they take accountability.
As much as embarrassing the incident of @AusWomenCricket members is, the Madhya Pradesh minister calling them out and saying it’s a lesson to be “more careful” makes it even worse.
What a shame! Obviously the government will not act on him, but in a time when we bid for Olympics, Commonwealth Games, and when we invite investors too, to India it is shameful to have such pathetic mentality in government.
Is it a crime for a woman, be it from a cricket team or not, to walk on the streets of our cities?
Instead of acting strongly on the many such incidents faced by women everyday, the minister saying such nonsense, is a disgrace.
I have decided to intervene in this matter, not as a lawyer or Advocate-on-Record, but as a Mother of a 17-year-old teenager and an 11-year-old child who will soon step into teenage years.
My intervention is not just on my behalf or for the sake of my own children, but on behalf of millions of Bharatiya Mothers like me, and for their Children, who deserve to grow up in safety, dignity, and innocence.
The issue concerns us all. Lowering the age of consent from 18 to 16 years is not a legal adjustment; it is a societal setback that could endanger our children’s future.
As an MSc in Chemistry, let me explain the issue of carcinogen emissions from the use of ethanol-blended petrol (e.g., #E10 or #E20 fuels).
Ethyl alcohol (ethanol), when oxidised, forms acetaldehyde (ethanal). Conversely, acetaldehyde (ethanal) when reduced, forms ethyl alcohol (ethanol). Note: In chemical nomenclature "-ol" is a suffix for alcohols and "-al" is for aldehydes.
When ethanol is consumed as an alcoholic beverage, it is metabolised in the human body into acetaldehyde, which is then further metabolised into acetate and excreted. However, acetaldehyde is a known toxic byproduct and is classified as a carcinogen. While ethanol itself is not inherently a carcinogen, its consumption initiates a chain reaction that can lead to cancer, particularly with heavy or prolonged consumption.
When ethanol is blended with petrol and burned in an internal combustion engine, the combustion process (oxidation) produces acetaldehyde as a byproduct due to incomplete combustion, as 100% combustion does not occur. The amount of acetaldehyde produced depends on factors such as engine type, combustion efficiency, air-fuel ratio, temperature, and operating conditions.
Thus, acetaldehyde formation is a recognised issue in biofuel combustion. While reports from NITI Aayog, the Petroleum Ministry, and the National Policy on Biofuels primarily focus on savings of more than Rs. one lakh crore, the health hazards posed by acetaldehyde, classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and highlighted by the Centre for Science and Environment, including risks of respiratory issues and cancer from elevated aldehyde emissions in urban areas, have been conspicuously ignored.
I sincerely hope that the government will reconsider the issue in its entirety.