Samson Safari Meeme

I’m a passionate software engineer who loves building solutions through code, but above all, I am a disciple of Christ, striving to let my work and life reflect

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

Stopping the bad guys with Cloudflare: 1,454 malicious requests blocked or challenged in the last month #cloudflare

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@MutembeiTV @SheriaLens

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@Kenyans @SheriaLens

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@Lilpoly253755 Hii discret bado unafunzwa na mindo ama kibet😅😅 the system look LU

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist Why are you running away and you asked for it😆

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist Science hasn’t denied God—it admits its limits. It can’t speak beyond matter. But matter is contingent and can’t cause itself. The material points to the immaterial.

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist Science keeps proposing theories to explain the universe’s origin — showing it cannot just exist by chance. Contingent, intelligible order always points beyond itself

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist What evidence do you have that this could exist randomly? Has anything we know ever appeared without a cause or explanation?

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist Scientists are trying to find the cause of the laws and constants — proving they can’t just appear for no reason. Contingent order points to a rational source: God

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist The universe isn’t random pieces—it’s a web. Stars, elements, life, ecosystems—all depend on each other. Contingent, interdependent order demands a rational source. That source is what we call God.

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist Nothing in the universe exists in isolation. Stars, elements, life, and ecosystems all depend on each other. Contingent, interdependent order points to a rational source sustaining it all.

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist Treating physical laws as self-explanatory turns description into explanation. That move is philosophical, not scientific, and it collapses into brute facts. If physics is all you have, then you have description without explanation.

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@elonmusk @grok tell elon this

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@elonmusk @elonmusk we need Grok IDE.. Google antigravity and cursor are trying but we need you to to come up with a super IDE

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@seniorjonnes @AtwoliiYa @GetareSenior Laikipia

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist @screenshoter screenshot this

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@ArchTheAtheist Science explains the mechanisms of nature, but the existence of those mechanisms implies a mind behind them. Laws require a lawgiver; order implies intention. Science reads the code of the universe—God wrote it.

[Samson Safari Meeme @meemesaf]

@Harmless12345 @grok is this true