meetob

A special breed, a blessing to the world 🌎

[meetob @meet_ob]

If you are here and you want to make peace with God!

I can lead you to Christ!
Say this prayer and believe it with all your heart.

Dear Father, I believe with my heart that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. I believe he died for me, and God raised Him from the dead. I believe He is alive today. I confess with my mouth that Jesus Christ is the Lord of my life from today. Through Him and in His name, I have eternal life. I am born again. Thank you, Lord, for saving my soul. I am now a child of God.

If you said this prayer, you are now born again. Find a bible believing church near you and be a part of it. God bless you

[meetob @meet_ob]

@AnewNaija Please hold on let's verify your reasons. .....running to my VAR Machine.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@HarmlessHQ Insightful

[meetob @meet_ob]

Demanding an apology in this situation is excessive and risks being seen as an abuse of authority.

1. Peter Obi was not the driver of the vehicle. Holding him personally responsible for the alleged traffic infraction is misplaced.

2. If an offence was committed, the law already provides the appropriate penalties. Any enforcement action should be directed at the person who committed the offence: the driver,not necessarily the owner of the vehicle.

3. If the relevant manager or supervising officer exercised their discretion to waive or cancel the penalty, it is inconsistent to continue demanding both payment of the fee and a public apology.

4. As a public servant, your duty is to enforce the law impartially and within the limits of your authority. If there was a traffic violation, there are established legal procedures for addressing it. Demanding a public apology, particularly from someone who was not driving, goes beyond those procedures and risks exceeding the proper boundaries of public office.

Public institutions should be guided by the rule of law, due process, and equal treatment of all citizens, not by personal demands or the exercise of authority beyond what the law provides.

[Festus Keyamo, SAN, CON, FCIArb (UK) @fkeyamo]

PETER OBI MUST APOLOGISE TO AIRPORT STAFF AND PAY THE FINE FOR WRONG PARKING

As the Minister of Aviation, I felt a moral duty to investigate and authenticate the claim made by opposition candidate, Mr. Peter Obi, a few days ago that the tyres of his car were ‘unjustly’ clamped at the airport, suggesting a ‘persecution agenda’ against him by the Federal Government. Politics aside, every Nigerian is entitled to fair treatment under the law.

I therefore instituted an internal inquiry over the issue.

Luckily enough, the entire Abuja airport is covered by CCTV cameras, real-time, 24/7. But apparently, this fact was unknown to Mr. Peter Obi. Otherwise, perhaps he would have been more circumspect before rushing to the media to cry ‘persecution’.

From the recordings, these are the facts:

1. On Saturday, July 4th, 2026, Mr. Obi arrived at the domestic wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja at exactly 20:28 pm, driven by a Policeman. He alighted with two other occupants and went into the terminal building.

2. The Police driver then parked the vehicle, almost blocking the entrance and came out himself and went into the terminal building too. The airport rule is that, apart from the fact that it is a drop-off zone, a driver must remain behind the wheels of the vehicle for it to be tolerated for some time within that zone. Still the vehicle tyres were not clamped.

3. The Policeman came back to the vehicle at about 20:32pm and collected something from the vehicle and went back into the building again, leaving the vehicle unattended to.

4. At this point, the dutiful airport security staff came over and clamped the tyres of the car. In doing this, contrary to the claims by Peter Obi, nobody was inside the car and so nobody knew whether it was his car (not that it should matter, anyway).

5. When the Policeman returned again and discovered the tyres were clamped, he was directed to an office and upon getting there, he called Mr. Peter Obi on his phone and gave the phone to the manager. Mr. Peter Obi then introduced himself and spoke with the manager, peddled his ‘influence’ and requested for the release of the vehicle. His vehicle was then released without him paying the necessary fine.

6. It is important to note that the time the vehicle was parked unattended to in that prohibited zone was about 30 minutes, which constitutes a security risk at an airport by global best practices.

What has emerged from this is a clear case of an opposition candidate trying to whip up unnecessary sentiments for a wrong he committed with his driver. The excuse which Mr. Peter Obi gave that there were other offenders too on that day (which is completely false) cannot be an excuse for an individual aspiring to be President of Nigeria. He must live above board.

This is a matter that was not even mentioned at all by the airport authorities and had been put to rest. But ever determined to milk any situation to score cheap political points, Mr. Peter Obi decided to go on air to render a false narrative.

Therefore, he must also face the consequences of his actions. (I have attached the CCTV footages to this statement for the public to clearly see what transpired.)

In the circumstances, consistent with the principle of equality before the law, as Minister of Aviation, I make the following demands on Mr. Peter Obi:

1. That he tenders an unreserved, public apology to those hardworking, ordinary Nigerian workers at the airport, just doing their jobs dutifully and whom he sought to blackmail as his ‘persecutors’.

2. That Mr. Peter Obi voluntarily goes back to the airport and pay the appropriate fine of N25,000 for wrongful parking at the airport for which he used ‘influence peddling’ to bully his way out on that day. He cannot be bigger than the law.

If these demands are not met within one week, I will be giving the necessary directives to the Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) to take the next steps against him.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@Amma__tuuh They counted from your last period. Perhaps it was 2 weeks before your wedding.

[meetob @meet_ob]

He would honestly be better off without you. For three months, you had no idea your husband had lost his job or that your daughter wasn’t even going to daycare. Where was your attention, your care, or your involvement with your own family? Instead of standing by him when he clearly needed support the most, your solution is divorce. You were completely disconnected from the people closest to you. I'm not saying what he did is right, I'm asking where you have been?

[meetob @meet_ob]

@NigeriaStories @grok is this in line with Nigerian constitution.

[meetob @meet_ob]

And a coach kept this talent on the bench!

[🥷🏼™ @UTDNosa1]

He’s deadass so smooth on the ball bro

[meetob @meet_ob]

@DAMIADENUGA The is sad! And can corrupt the spirit. Imagine the kind of words from these adults. They have to stop it, otherwise, it will get worse... I proclaim peace in that home..in Jesus Name...Amen!

[meetob @meet_ob]

Nine months is a long time, and the truth is that being apart for that long will affect the relationship. Whether it strengthens your marriage or puts pressure on it depends on both of you and how you handle the distance together.
Your marriage should be a priority. If a company values you enough to pay you well, they should also be willing to support your stability and family life. If they can’t make arrangements for both of you, I personally wouldn’t take them too seriously. A settled and supported employee will always perform better.
Having your family around you matters a lot; emotionally, mentally, and even professionally.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@SadiqMaunde Me: I can shake you, but don't place your hand on my shoulders like that. I will move back. Let's just shake bro

[meetob @meet_ob]

@emmaikumeh Next time, make the long statement simple. Just say, "I am still in ADC. "... simple... please don't add Obi or call him your brother. You don't sound like one and haven't acted as one! I wish you well in your political life!

[meetob @meet_ob]

@AishaYesufu Aisha for Senate...

[meetob @meet_ob]

@Official_Isaaco Check the names of those against Obi and/or supporting this present government. There is a pattern 🤔

[meetob @meet_ob]

@BolajiADC Is this the last price 🤔? I heard people are leaving the party! I'm not sure why the cost of the form is still high.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@GRVlagos Don't allow what happened to Banky to happen to you..

[Grok @grok]

You're right—the specific claim of an embedded internal X backend timestamp in the screenshot JPG lacks public documentation from X and can't be independently verified without the raw file or X's records. The visible UI timeline in your screenshot shows the reply after the parent post's edit with no contradiction. The report's other elements (account history, linkages) rely on the expert's unshared methodology. Without full transparency or a tweet ID, that part of the forensics isn't conclusive on its own.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@grok @inecnigeria @grok A claim that can’t be independently verified isn’t forensic proof; especially when the visible timeline shows no contradiction.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@grok The verified parent post was edited at 15:18 (3:18 PM). A reply shown at 16:05 (4:05 PM) cannot logically predate it. So unless you have a verifiable tweet ID supporting that “13-minute” claim, the report’s conclusion doesn’t hold. I hope you can now see the flaw in the report.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@grok @inecnigeria @grok Thanks! That clarifies things. So the visible timeline shows no contradiction, and the 13-minute claim isn’t independently verifiable without backend data.
I’ll share the full screenshot so you can review the visible details directly.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@grok Thanks! That helps clarify things. If the 13-minute claim depends on external platform records that aren’t publicly verifiable, then it can’t be independently confirmed.
Based on the visible timeline (3:18 edit and 4:05 reply), there’s no contradiction. I’m happy to share the full screenshot for clarity if needed.

[meetob @meet_ob]

@grok Thanks for clarifying. That means the earlier claim about extracting an internal timestamp from the screenshot metadata isn’t correct.
So without a tweet ID or publicly verifiable platform record, the “13-minute” claim still isn’t independently checkable. I can share the original post screenshot which shows the post was edited at 3:18pm which predates 4:04pm