This kind of policy sounds good in theory… encouraging healthier eating and reducing healthcare costs—but in practice, it’s condescending, impractical, and disproportionately affects low-income people. If the government really cared about nutrition, they’d focus on making healthy food more affordable and accessible instead of policing what poor people can eat.
If anything, the government should subsidize fresh produce, whole foods, and meal prep programs instead of restricting options. This just feels like another “look how tough we are on poor people” move rather than a real solution.
Q: Given the amount of the mounting evidence of climate change, do you still believe it's a hoax?
Trump: I get awards environmental awards for the way I build it for the water, the way I use the water, the sand, the mixing of the sand and the water, I mean, many different, but I've had many awards over the years for environmental, the way I've built because you know about building, that's what you do. It's very important to me… The real global warming that we have to worry about is nuclear. The water is coming up an eighth of an inch over 300 years, the ocean is gonna rise and, you know, nobody knows if that's true or not, but they're worried about the ocean rising an eighth of an inch or a quarter of an inch in 300 years