@individualist_0@itsfushiguronow@imstukintraffic wtf is this. you just conceded female infanticide hit females more than males, implied it's because of "deformed babies" and not because of their sex (somehow) and then asked the exact same question twice with different wording. did ai write this? it makes literally no sense
@individualist_0@itsfushiguronow@imstukintraffic "for no reason other than them being females" and "it wasn't gender specific" in the same sentence. nevermind that you dodged the point earlier too
@bulkbiker@Zombie_Jesus_v3@_A1ien_k1ttyz_@raemisa@eoine_oc@DrJCrawford@AllianceLGB brother your reading comprehension isn't the best if you think I'm saying they're lying about surveying their own members. I'm saying they shouldn't present their tweet as generalisable to the entire population when they admit in their study that it isn't. this isn't hard
@bulkbiker@Zombie_Jesus_v3@_A1ien_k1ttyz_@raemisa@eoine_oc@DrJCrawford@AllianceLGB first it's the guy very blatantly just using ai and making no sense with it, now it's a guy being purposefully stupid and pretending they're not presenting a (by the study's own words) biased and non-generalisable study as conclusive for the entire population. jfc
@individualist_0@imstukintraffic india, ancient greece, middle east, rome, korea, japan, pakistan, bangladesh, and a big portion of medieval and early europe practiced female infanticide or abandonment at rates higher than the male counterpart
@siriusblack9999 this is just objectively wrong. it's a literal dating and matchmaking service made by keeper, a dating company, which advertises itself as a "dating standards calculator" that's intended to make you lower your standards. do you see how including infants is dumb or not?
@siriusblack9999 this is completely irrelevant. in a dating app, having "all men" include infants is misleading. the male dating pool isn't 164 million. that's the point which I'm baffled everyone disagrees with and is willing to include infants in a dating pool to dismiss it
@siriusblack9999@TheChelby you don't see how it's deceiving and dishonest to include infants and 100 year olds into the "all men" criteria in a dating context?