How To Prove A Negative
The argument is often made one cannot prove a negative, but one can. For example, the following is a proof of God, in the negative.
If God does not exist, we would be under the law of the strongman, the Nimrod and we would have to obey him and any law that he creates. If God did not exist rights would be privileges and need a license to enjoy, e.g., the right to own a home, carry out a trade, own a gun and so on. One would not own anything, at least not outright, there would be liens on everything and ownership, like everything else, would be a privilege, granted by license, by the state and easily revoked. And because nothing is owned, the state could take what it wished under the strongman rules doctrine. Also called the law of the jungle: “Might Makes Right And The End Justifies The Means.”
If there is no God, there is law. Law is ethics without God there is no morality, there is law. We are permitted to do whatever the law allows. We cannot do what the law disallows. This is not so if there is a God. God governs by moral law. Morality would mean we can only do what is right, regardless of the law.
There would be no morality without God, there would be only law and those who make and enforce the law and their subjects who are under the law.
Therefore, if you want to know if God exists, simply observe if you are under the law or live by what is right, good and moral.
If you are under the law and a subject of the state, there is no God, not in your life, not in the world in which you live.
See how simple it is.
Intentionality does not reflect the opinion of a single man or clique. To have intention is to have equality because true intention requires honesty. Intent requires a change in reality or it is a lie. We may say we intend to stop drinking but if there is no manifestation of this in a changed reality, the claim of intention is a lie, it is dishonest.
An empire is nothing more than a particular volume of intention, sufficient to change the world in a very fundamental way.
An Intentional Empire is, as an intentional community, a group that intends to do something and does it and as a consequence, changes the world.
@janninereid1 I never felt anyway until BLM, now I am more proud of being White every day and I cannot think of how dispiriting it has to be to belong to another race. Thank you BLM for waking me up to the supriority of Whites.
Reality can be altered if you intend to alter it. If your intentions are not good they are self-defeating. If you are not logical, your intentions will contradict and be self-defeating.
There are somethings that must come to be, because no one can truly intend for them not to exist. This makes them inevitable.
If you have good intentions, promote and share this post.
If not, you do not intend the world to be altered, but it will change because we intend for it to happen.
Intentionality alters reality.
You have probably heard of Intentional Community.
I propose creating an Intentional Empire.
There is no risk and no cost.
If you are able to intend it, then you can participate in it.
Intentionality is tied to a purpose. That purpose must be perfection. If the purpose is not perfection there cannot be any direction or destination. Without these things there is no intentionality.
The concept that confuses people the most is perfection. The world teaches us that perfection is beyond us. This is not the teachings of the Bible. It is not what Scripture tells us.
Logically speaking, how can there be a 1st order principle or even a purpose to our lives, if there is no perfection waiting at the end. How can we have a destination that is less than perfect? If the destination is less than perfection, it would be like going on a journey in which we intend to stop short of where we wanted to go.
@Airaxora This reality is insane and all of you are technically insane for living in it.
And you are too irrational to comprehend your level of insanity.
Are We Using The Wrong Monetary System
Despite the history of money supposedly being about mankind using various types or kinds of money, this is actually the history of one class of things being utilized as currency. Over our history we have used many variations of the same sort of thing all based on a belief that no one feels there is a need to question. Yet, the very claim that money has value is bizarre. Money is supposed to represent value or be a representation of value. Money itself ought to have no value.
However when dictionaries define money, they say money is a unit of value, or money is a store of value. These are contradictions. A unit does not store what it measures. A unit is simply a way to quantify an amount, it is not the thing being measured, which it would need to be if it was able to store value. Do inches store length or measure it?
There two kinds of money portrayed by the two definitions. We have been trying to turn a journey into an odometer. Using gold as money highlights the dilemma. Gold bullion used as coinage makes the coinage more valuable, the more the coins are utilized as money, which rewards those who hoard the coinage.
Using gold, or any other asset, as a form of currency, is akin to using rubber for a ruler. No asset regardless of what it is, can function as a unit of account. Money must do nothing and be nothing but a unit of account or a unit to measure value.
Value is always an amount of work added to assets, through labor.
Money ultimately measures and represents the work value done.
When we do work, we expend energy for a period of time. This expenditure of energy can be given a value and therefore, all work can be represented by units of account representing the number of hours of work done, creating value.
For those of you on the left who say slaves & immigrants built America! 🇺🇸 👇🏻
Don’t tell that to this preacher from Harlem! 😅
He will tell you like it is!🙌🏻🇺🇸❤️
He’s spitting out facts!👊🏻 And he’s funny while he does it!😂😅
For 6000 years mankind, most specifically the Christian church, has permitted dishonesty to coexist with them.
The wolf in sheeps clothing is a dishonest person.
People lie to justify dishonest activity. Dishonesty in speech covers up a dishonest life.
Dishonest people are spiritually immature, they are spritual children because acting as a child is the sign that one is spiritually immature. As an adult, acting as a child is to be immature spiritually. Children are dependents, adults are necessarily independent. To be a dependent as an adult is to be as a child.
The spiritually immature are dishonest because one cannot live as a dependent adult without engaging in dishonesty. The spiritually immature must lie to some extent and they must steal or scam resources from the spiritually mature. There is no logical way for it to be otherwise.
Only the spiritually mature can be saved.Spiritual immaturity is the unforgiveable sin, because the spiritually immature cannot be saved.
Hell belongs to those who never grew up, the perpetual child.
To remain a child requires the spiritually immature to lie and what they lie about is their right to what others produce.
The cult of the perpetual child has created a population of liars who hide dishonety behind their lies because they were never required to take responsibility for themselves.
Hell belongs to those who never grew up, the perpetual child.
To remain a child requires the spiritually immature to lie and what they lie about is their right to what others produce.
The cult of the perpetual child has created a population of liars who hide dishonety behind their lies because they were never required to take responsibility for themselves.
@0xnoLE@rirokpik I would be more sympathetic if you would pay me repartitions for my great grandaddies leg that a frenchman broke and never compensated him for. But if I cannot get mine, why ought anyone else get theirs?
@0xnoLE@rirokpik All we had to do was work, pay our own way and be honest and the world would be a paradise, but it is too hard for people to do this. Everyone is looking for an angle by which they can justify some form of parasitism. You all are destroying civilization one scam at a time.