@RJConway92 To be fair, given the circumstances they are doing well. We need less loan players as when they leave the following season the holes appear and a perpetual repeat is necessary. Loan to buy is our best option as we then get stability and growth
@thederbydigest We can only register 26, injuries occur, hence the 26. With 9 subs, including 1 home grown, we effectively need 25 non home grown. We already have sufficient under contract, so unless we sell players we cannot take any more! So what do you propose the club do without selling some
@domjdietrich Isn’t a good look for the IFR either as it was their first test case. But the club is in DC’s excellent hands, so plan B it will be on incoming players. 4 good loans and some surprises from the recruitment teams and we can be comfortable mid table with youth beginning to be used
@martin11080984@JimmyRamBelieve@Charlie86588150 For squad costs there is a limit, however for infrastructure (stadium for example) or the academy there isn’t a limit under the new financial rules, so there is scope to invest there and free up revenue used for that to allow main squad as part of the 85% of revenue
@domjdietrich using the fee to make Sanderson permanent and free up a loan place. 3 more incomings and 6 out on loan/sold will make our summer dealing’s complete
@dcfcofficial When agymang fit we go for the future with
Wilson/newRB, langas,Clark, beck
Kenzo, ozoh
Brewster, Adam’s, cbt
Agymang
buy ozoh and beck for the future and also replace Adam’s with Armstrong or similar - all on permanent
Then some of our academy come in for year contracts
@dcfcofficial 4,1, 3, 2
Experience wise when fit and wit strength
zetastrom
Wilson, bath, Clark, beck
Langas
Kenzo, Adam’s, ozoh
Brewster, morris
Front then swaps round
As agymang, salvason wiemann, cbt when we Need them
Change 3,5,2 without ball and much higher up the pitch