No commentary. No editorial. Just collated footage.
@HarrisonHSmith deserves a journalistic award for this one.
Watch it if you are prepared to have your golden calf smashed.
The mainstream media’s disinterest in the rampant Jewish supremacy in these documents is fascinating. If it were a conservative being white supremacist they’d be all over it. But this, for some reason, is apparently distasteful to acknowledge.
Helen Andrews giving off major “hot for teacher” vibes and she’s brilliant on top of it.
Here she explains how the woke movement coincided with the flip of Universities from male to female dominant and the feminine characteristics inherent in wokeness.
🚨: Yesterday I was violently attacked and assaulted while debating the deportation of illegal migrants from our country at a University
My good friend, colleague, cameraman, and editor, @WillColeshill, immediately stepped in and placed the man who attacked me under a citizen’s arrest while I called the police.
Instead of arresting the original attacker, Will was arrested for assault shortly after the @metpoliceuk became aware of what our banner said: 'Britain Needs Mass Deportations.' - he is still in custody as I write this.
We are living under a corrupt, two-tier system where calm, rational, and open debate, even on topics widely discussed in the mainstream, leaves you vulnerable to violence and police action.
I can confidently say this arrest was politically motivated. Please read the FULL statement for proper context and detail.
@FreedomWatchGB needs your support. We are just getting started, and after these events, we believe we must take the necessary steps to fund paid security to mitigate further attacks, but we can't do that without your help.
Please donate via the GoFundMe link in the thread below 👇🏻🙏🏻
The Church of England has been in managed decline for years, and we are at to witness the end of it.
England spread the Gospel around the world, through a great empire.
And now, the Gospel must be returned to England.
Women cannot lead the Church. Priestesses are not Christian
This teacher-turned-cognitive scientist shared a disturbing reality that left the room stunned.
“Our kids are LESS cognitively capable than we were at their age.”
Every previous generation outperformed its parents since we began recording in the late 1800s.
So, what happened?
Screens.
Dr. Jared Horvath explained:
“Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have, from basic attention to memory, to literacy, to numeracy, to executive functioning, to EVEN GENERAL IQ, even though they go to more school than we did.”
“So why? … The answer appears to be the tools we are using within schools to drive that learning (screens).”
“If you look at the data, once countries adopt digital technology widely in schools, performance goes down significantly, to the point where kids who use computers about five hours per day in school for learning purposes will score over two-thirds of a standard deviation LESS than kids who rarely or never touch tech at school. And that’s across 80 countries.”
But screens aren’t just decimating learning and making new generations less intelligent than the ones before them.
They’re doing something far worse. And when you take a closer look, it isn’t pretty. 🧵
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
Trump isn't going to Davos to negotiate—he's delivering terms of surrender.
His team has already withdrawn from 66 globalist bodies and is tracking the money behind domestic chaos.
The real offensive is underway.
🎥 Watch:
A month ago I discussed what is really going on with Venezuela. Hint: it has a lot more to do with Britian, Tony Blair and dirty money than it does with oil. The segment on Venezuela starts at 6:51. https://t.co/jxCiUmHfJq
Ha‼️Nick Kyrgios, ranked 671st and injured, just beat the world’s top female player, Aryna Sabalenka, in a ‘battle of the sexes’ match - even though they gave her a smaller court.
This was designed as a humiliation ritual for men, but has backfired spectacularly. Hilarious‼️😂
🚨 BREAKING: Rubio just BANNED British censorship agents from entering the US.
Now the Empire is playing the long game—targeting 2026 midterms with Mike Pence as their inside man.
But Trump's economic revolution can make their entire strategy obsolete.
Consultant Engineer in Wales, forced to stand and speak out against all the Net Zero crap planned for the area. He says none of it adds up or makes sense, somebody is clearly going to make a lot of money if this goes ahead