Christian Conservative Fighting Radical Left Anti-Christian Babykilling Nazis-Hard Rock-Metal-Guitar-Megadeth-Boston Band #TexasSecession Anti-Anti-War Radicals
There is only one thing that can save us out of this mess now: God. Don't fool yourself into believing otherwise. It looks to me like we are heading at breakneck speed into the abyss.
Is the Australian gov. going to do something or does someone need to go over there and kick their worthless punk heads together?
https://t.co/JCAKacqrrN
Listen to the New York Time's Wajahat Ali's racist, anti-America muslim takeover of America rant:
“White People: You LOST!” | Have Immigrants Officially Taken Over? https://t.co/aaeMgIEsCZ via @YouTube
Muslims don’t know Jesus (Yeshuʿ); they know ʿĪsā. They don’t accept the Gospels; they accept the Injīl. But these aren’t just different texts. They reflect fundamentally different figures. Arabic-speaking Christians throughout the Middle East don’t even call him ʿĪsā. They call him Yeshuʿ.
ʿĪsā doesn’t preach, interpret law, or tell parables. He performs miracles, confirms earlier revelation, and foretells the coming of Muḥammad. He is not a rabbi or a moral teacher. He is a character in Muḥammad’s ascent narrative, meant to bend reality rather than shape the heart. A miracle worker, not a voice of halakhic or ethical authority.
He is portrayed as a Muslim prophet and serves as a literary response to Christian claims, not their source. The Qurʾān denies Jesus’ crucifixion, divinity, and sonship, yet preserves his virgin birth and messianic title. In other words, it reframes Christianity through an Islamic lens.
Yeshuʿ, on the other hand, is a Jewish teacher. He debates law, quotes Torah, clashes with Pharisees. He teaches in parables, rides a donkey, and is crucified by Rome. Even if you set aside Christian theology, the historical shape of his life remains recognizable and Jewish.
This is not a recovery of the Jewish Jesus. It is a rejection of the Christian one. They barely share a name. They certainly don’t share a legacy.
The claim that Jews ran the Atlantic slave trade originates in Nation of Islam ideology and was popularized by Louis Farrakhan and Nation of Islam literature, particularly The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews (1991).
While rejected by historians and many Black scholars, the claim circulated widely enough to become 'common knowledge' in some African American communities through repetition rather than evidence.
If it wasn’t obvious before, the mask finally comes off with Candace Owens holding up The Talmudic Jew by August Rohling as proof for her claims about so-called Talmudic Judaism. At that point, there is no ambiguity about where this is going.
The Talmudic Jew was published in 1871, at the height of European racialized 'Scientific' Anti-semitism. Just eight years later, in 1879, Wilhelm Marr would coin the term Anti-semitism itself. Jews were being emancipated legally while being demonized culturally, and this moment demanded a pseudo-academic justification for hostility toward them, something that could pass as research rather than prejudice. Rohling’s book served that function.
Rohling was a Catholic priest and polemicist and not competent in Rabbinic Hebrew or Aramaic. The Talmud is not a book you quote for doctrine. It is a legal corpus built from arguments, disagreements, hypotheticals, and minority opinions, preserved precisely because disagreement is central to how Jewish law works (more on this below).
In 1883, Rohling sued Joseph Samuel Bloch for libel after Bloch publicly accused him of scholarly fraud. Bloch challenged him to defend his citations. Rohling could not even translate a single page of Talmud selected at random. Between 1884 and 1885, independent scholars examined his work and demonstrated that his quotations were fabricated or mistranslated and that his entire framework rested on misrepresentation. In 1885, Rohling withdrew the case rather than face full proceedings. He never recovered academically.
Rohling’s method was simple and dishonest. He invented quotations, mistranslated selectively, ripped lines from legal hypotheticals, erased context, and recycled medieval blood-libel accusations as if they were rabbinic law. From the opening pages, he presents Judaism as morally depraved and treats the Talmud as a single corrupt ideology rather than a record of debate. He announced his conclusions first and then retrofitted citations to support them (I recommend reading the intro)
It is the same method Candace Owens is now operating under.
The Talmudic Jew had zero standing in serious scholarship. Its survival was confined to places where truth was not the point, including Nazi propaganda in the 1930s, Soviet Anti-semitic tactics, Arab nationalist polemics, and later conspiracy culture.
That is the lineage Owens draws from when she presents this book as evidence. This is not just asking questions. It is reviving a framework that has already been tested, exposed, and discarded.
Texts like this resurface during periods of political stress and social realignment because they offer a ready-made moral culprit. First comes the claim that a group is morally alien. Then the insistence that criticism is being silenced. Then the rehabilitation of language that once would have been disqualifying. None of this is new. Only the packaging changes.
People like to imagine that history repeats itself only in obvious ways, with uniforms and slogans. It doesn’t. It rhymes, and the couplets are getting closer.
I don’t pretend to know exactly what the inflection point will look like, but I’m confident there will be one in the next 2 years.
Pointing this out now is not alarmism, it’s pattern recognition.
You're wrong and this isn't your job anyway. There are racists and misogynists trying to gain control and influencers too cowardly to call them out and therefore they should have been called out. Thank God for Ben Shapiro. He did the right and necessary thing with his speech. We will keep track of those attacking him and circling the wagons.
@HarmeetKDhillon Unfortunately I do believe some housekeeping is in order before we can plot a course forward, because some wackos want to take things in a very dark and unAmerican direction.
@HarmeetKDhillon We are not “firing inside the tent”, we are initiating an immune response to cancerous cells that are poisoning MAGA.
There is a class of conservative influencer who does nothing but sabotage Trump and bitch 24/7 about the Jews/Israel.
They are not allies. They are poison.
@DillonPerry7@DLoesch@HarmeetKDhillon Yeah, and it was me too. So what? You were were probably cheering when Trump and Priebus put the "proud, gay man" up on stage.
@HarmeetKDhillon I wish we could, but it's their way or the highway with the radicals. So, since their way is unAmerican and sometimes evil, no. We have to deal with them first.