@hackerdocc@wolftivy@SwayStar123 But doesn't having many optimal solutions actually imply sub-optimality? If we have many solutions each equally optimal we can change variables and receive the same performance. Therefore, part of what is encoded in these variables is redundant and therefore inefficient
On Thursday, the European Parliament votes on Chat Control 1 (the voluntary scanning, not the mandatory scanning, called Chat Control 2). Again.
The Parliament has already voted against Chat Control 1. Two times. But the Council of Ministers and the Parliament President refuse to accept it.
Now, the Council has demanded an urgent procedure. This is a procedure that is meant to be used for new legislative proposals, not proposals that the Parliament has already rejected. An urgent procedure requires an absolute majority to be rejected (361 out of the Parliament's 720 members). This will be difficult to reach, since those who abstain from voting are counted as a yes-vote in an urgent procedure. By scheduling the vote during the summer, they are making it even harder to reach those 361 no-votes. This is downright dirty tactic by the Council and the President of the European Parliament.
The President of the European Parliament has sided with the Council against her own chamber. For context, this is the EP President, Roberta Metsola:
---
🇪🇺 The EU is now for the 6th time trying to force Chat Control through which lets them scan ALL your private messages, photos and emails without a warrant
Implictly showing the EU is not democratic and not about what the people of Europe want, because once a law is rejected, you just re-submit it until nobody is watching and it's passed
November 2023: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
June 2024: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
October 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
November 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
March 2026: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
July 2026: 📝 Chat Control is back
Even the EU's own lawyers stated Chat Control is unconstitutional: "generalised message scanning is incompatible with Article 7 of the EU Charter"
You have to wonder why the EU is so adament about reading your private chats, right?
@lancelotdacosta I'd be interested though I've got to say there seems to be not that much information on the website about what this programme is actually offering. Can you give me some more details or point me to some place where I can find more details about the programme?
@myisdimitry@chucker@cbastanier Maybe, aber ich höre mir gerne andere Meinungen an in der Hoffnung, etwas Neues zu lernen und die Welt besser zu verstehen :)
@chucker@myisdimitry@cbastanier Was ist es denn sonst noch? Ich persönlich sehe da eigentlich nichts anderes, aber da kommen wir dann vermutlich vom Wissen ins Glaube
@chucker@myisdimitry@cbastanier Hab ehrlich gesagt kein Bock, mich jetzt hier mit rumzuschlagen, aber was machen denn Ihrer Meinung nach Menschen? Ist das keine statistische Vorhersage? Das Gehirn lernt genauso ais Fehlerdifferenz + Evolution, was auch ein statistischer Vorgang ist.
@MilksandMatcha I'm in the last months of my master thesis and was already thinking about buying it because the limits on Plus are limiting me but couldn't quite convince me that spending so much money is justified as a student. So this would be perfect! But maybe some needs it more than I do :)
@PeterGrubl@marvin_wank Marvin ist definitiv nicht links 😭😭 Das ist eine libertäre Haltung, die nicht nach Ansicht der Person unterscheidet, sondern das grundsätzlich als legitim ansieht.
@DavidDuhme Check ich nicht. Wir sollten froh sein, wenn jemand den Job machen will und es dann nicht noch schwerer machen. Vorallem weil das alles überhaupt keinen Einfluss auf die Fähigkeiten des Soldats hat.
Wording find ich zu krass, aber die Forderung selbst, den ÖRR auf Nachrichten/Bildung zu reduzieren, vollkommen richtig. Das kann man als öffentliche Aufgabe ansehen und somit die Finanzierung durch die Allgemeinheit rechtfertigen. Für Unterhaltung gilt das für mich nicht.