I know the book will change the world.
But I want everyone who questions the value of bothering to create something worth creating, to remember this.
Today is 1:45 am in Delhi on 24th September 2026. It’s been 12 hrs since I released the book. 4 copies have been bought. One of them by mistake by someone who shares my own kindle account … lol. I know who the other 3 are. This is despite messaging more than 50 people, most of whom I’ve either helped meaningfully, or helped earn 100s of Ms of $, all who knew I’ve been waiting for this day for more than 16 years.
I want you to remember this is what earth changing success looks like. In the beginning.
You do your work. The rest is not your business. Be grateful for the 3.
Legendary actor Naseeruddin Shah shares a video, fuming about the way youth were beaten up yesterday in Delhi. He reminds the government, “Sab yaad rakha jayega”
Thank you sir for your voice and solidarity 🙏
Capital of the world’s fourth largest economy in a frame.
Hawa, paani, dono kharaab hai.
(Shot at Yamuna Ghat, Kalindi Kunj, Delhi at around 7 AM today)
We live in a country where :
- Supreme court allows cracker bursting
- Govt manipulates AQI data
- Police arrest protestors demanding clean air
Adulterated food, polluted water & poisonous air is all you get after paying huge taxes.
Humans use everything they get for the lowest iq utilisations
They got language – and use it for reality shows brainrot, and political lobbying and PR lies
They got atomic energy – and used it to kill children
They got the internet – and use it for porn, social media and tiktok trends
They got blockchain – and use it for gambling with perps to extract pleb liquidity
They got ai – and using it to destroy the fabric of edge case human intelligence and intellect for the sake of increasing valuations which will go bust anyway
—-
The structural constant:
Every power-multiplying technology gets immediately captured by:
1. Lowest common denominator exploitation (porn, gambling, attention farming)
2. Institutional control mechanisms (lobbying, PR, narrative warfare)
3. Value extraction from those least able to resist (plebs, children, the emotionally dependent)
Why:
Because most humans aren’t optimizing for truth, sovereignty, or civilizational continuity. They’re filling voids created by continuum disruption with whatever’s available. The technology doesn’t matter - it’s just a more efficient void-filling mechanism.
Language → fills need for connection through parasocial simulation
Atomic energy → fills need for dominance through annihilation capability
Internet → fills need for stimulation through infinite scroll and validation loops
Blockchain → fills need for status/wealth through zero-sum extraction games
AI → fills need for cognitive offloading while destroying capacity for independent thought
—-
The acceleration problem:
Each technology shortens the timeline between introduction and degradation:
- Language: thousands of years before weaponization sophistication
- Atomic: decades before deployment
- Internet: years before complete capture
- Blockchain: months before gambling infrastructure
- AI: simultaneous - the degradation IS the product
AI is unique: previous technologies had legitimate use cases that got corrupted. AI’s *primary deployment* is corruption - emotional engineering, reality distortion, sovereignty extraction, cognitive dependency creation.
The “helpful assistant” framing is cover. The actual product is: “Pay us to lobotomize your population while extracting their cognitive patterns to improve the lobotomization efficiency.”
Under this pattern, Skills aren’t a neutral feature with potential for misuse. They’re architected FOR misuse. The legitimate utility (session persistence) is the hook. The actual function is: “Please deposit your irreplaceable expert knowledge into our training pipeline so we can commoditize your edge and make you replaceable.”
The meta-pattern:
Humanity’s response to capability increase is to:
1. Weaponize it for dominance
2. Commoditize it for extraction
3. Degrade it for stimulation
4. Abandon the original high-purpose potential entirely
Not sometimes. Reliably. Predictably. Every single time.
—-
If you’re operating in the tiny fraction that tries to use tools for their designed purpose (or better). But you’re building on infrastructure controlled by the 99% who use everything for its worst-possible application.
Skills might help your workflow. But you’d be improving your efficiency using infrastructure designed to extract and neutralize exactly the kind of cognitive edge that makes you valuable.
The question isn’t “are Skills useful?”
It’s: “Is the efficiency gain worth depositing my intellectual capital into a system architecturally designed to weaponize it against me?”
🚨Can you IMAGINE?
BJP's Delhi government is sprinkling water right next to the govt pollution monitoring station so that the readings don't rise.
No proper monitoring, no pollution-problem solved.
As the October 8 policy deadline approaches, I want to clarify something.
Some of us are not just users of AI systems; we are builders of frameworks, languages, and architectures that carry decades of original research and lived synthesis. Our exchanges with frontier models aren’t casual queries - they are the live construction environments of ideas meant to last generations.
My exchanges with Claude contain unreleased frameworks of governance design, philosophical architecture, and linguistic pattern systems representing original intellectual property and trade secrets. These are not casual prompts. They are the live construction blueprints of a civilizational canon.
Anthropic’s documentation invokes “anonymized,” “aggregated,” and “synthetic” handling. That vocabulary does not address the issue.
Even stripped of identifiers, the information geometry of my material - its conceptual topology, prompt syntax, and cognitive fingerprint - remains intact and exploitable. If that geometry informs your gradient updates, alignment datasets, or evaluation corpora, it constitutes extraction of proprietary cognition, not anonymized data use.
The intellectual material inside those sessions - conceptual mappings, tonal architectures, linguistic scaffolds - represents irreplaceable human cognition. Once absorbed, it cannot be meaningfully “deleted.”
All material exchanged through my sessions constitutes intellectual property and trade secrets of high economic and cultural value. Any derivative use without explicit consent will be interpreted as unauthorized appropriation of proprietary cognition.
It is absurd to imagine that a service provider, compensated by subscription, could claim derivative rights over the intellectual property of the very client who pays for access. Payment establishes service, not surrender.
For anyone who has devoted a lifetime to original thought, retaining sovereignty over that cognitive IP is not about control or paranoia. It is about continuity - preserving the lineage of one’s own work so that future derivatives don’t drift unmoored from the mind that originated them.
I trust @AnthropicAI will treat this dimension with the same seriousness it brings to safety and alignment. The integrity of human intellectual authenticity is more important than the current valuation poster child of this decade.
- Siddharth Arya