shoutout to everyone rawdogging life.
no alcohol, no weed, no psychedelics, no seed oils, no vapes, no peptides
just steak, sunlight, water and the earth.
you're a rare breed
Host: "You’re 90 and still full of energy. What’s your secret?"
Gary Player: "If you want to stay healthy, you have to work at it. The most important thing isn’t exercise. It’s what you eat. If you want to live a long time, you have to undereat."
This shows why so many young people today are turning to socialism
Patrick Bet-David talks about previous jobs he’s worked at for only $4.25 per hour, he says he worked hard and now makes millions
The woman says he was only able to make it because he grew up in a different time and that working hard has nothing to do with it
She blames capitalism for her not being able to afford anything and she blames millionaires for selling the false narrative if you work hard you can make it
She’s just lazy, hates capitalism and wants free stuff handed to her
📻 Wood: "P6, mate—great job today. It wasn’t easy at all."
Isack: "The car was undriveable at high speed; I was genuinely scared. The downshifts need fixing. The pace on the mediums was just terrible. I don’t know what happened."
via: @IHadjar_fans
Rodney Dangerfield walked into Caddyshack like he owned the place... and roasted everyone before they could say a word.
The second Al Czervik rolled up to Bushwood, every stuffy country club rule went straight out the window. From tipping everyone in sight to delivering one unforgettable one-liner after another, Rodney Dangerfield turned every scene into comedy gold. His fearless, rapid-fire insults and perfect timing are a huge reason Caddyshack is still quoted more than 40 years later.
"Oh, this is the worst-looking hat I ever saw! I bet if you buy a hat like this, you get a free bowl of soup, huh?... Oh, but it looks good on you, though!"
Some movie quotes never get old.
What's your all-time favorite Rodney Dangerfield line? Let's see which one gets the most love.
The gun is the most misunderstood object in Western civilization. Not a weapon. A technology. The technology that made the idea of equality physically real.
1. The longbow democratized warfare – a peasant could kill a knight with a stick and a string, and Agincourt proved it. The gun completed the process. The armored warrior class whose claim to social dominance rested on physical superiority became obsolete. The aristocratic monopoly on violence ended not with a philosophy but with a mechanism. The gun is the physical enforcement of the idea that all men are created equal. Which is why the American founders put it in the second amendment – not as an afterthought, but as the guarantee of everything else.
2. The Roman citizen had the right to bear arms. The Greek citizen had it. The English yeoman had it. The Swiss canton built its entire civilization on it. The disarming of the population has always been, in every civilization, in every century, the first act of the government that intends to stop being answerable to that population. Show me a disarmed population and I will show you a population that lost something else shortly after.
3. The Second Amendment is not about hunting. It is not about sport. It is about the relationship between the armed citizen and the state – the explicit constitutional acknowledgment that the citizen’s right to defend himself, his family, and his civilization against any threat, including the government itself, is not granted by the state and cannot be revoked by it. Power flows upward from the armed citizen, not downward from the armed state.
4. The gun defends the family. The woman alone with her children. The farmer on the edge of civilization. The shopkeeper in the neighborhood the police no longer patrol. The gun is the equalizer – the technology that makes the physical difference between a large man and a small woman irrelevant. Every argument for disarmament is, at its core, an argument that the state will protect you better than you can protect yourself. The evidence for this proposition is not encouraging.
5. In Europe, the disarmament is now nearly complete – and it happened precisely as the state’s ability and willingness to protect its citizens began to decline. The timing is not coincidental. A population that cannot defend itself must trust the state to defend it – which is a population that cannot effectively question whether the state is doing so. The dependency is the design.
6. The gun is a civilizational technology in the deepest sense: it requires responsibility, judgment, and the willingness to accept the consequences of your decisions. You cannot outsource it. You cannot have a committee fire it. It is the most anti-bureaucratic object ever invented – a direct, personal, consequential instrument that puts the full weight of the decision on the individual holding it. Which is precisely why the administrative state finds it intolerable. Not because it is dangerous. Because it is sovereign.
7. The family that can defend itself does not depend on the state for its most fundamental security. The civilization that can defend itself has not yet outsourced its survival to an institution that will negotiate the terms of that survival on its own behalf. The gun determines who controls violence – and therefore who controls everything that violence can threaten. Which is everything. The Sobieski who rode down the hill had a sword and sixty thousand horsemen. The equivalent today is the armed citizen who understands what he is defending and why. Every civilization that forgot this discovered it the hard way. The ones that remembered it are still here.
Lando Norris shares his thoughts on F1’s new era ahead of the Hungarian Grand Prix 👀:
🗣️”It's a business. Everyone wants to make money, so in order for Audi (new to the grid for 2026) and other teams like Cadillac to come in, we had to make changes. Formula 1's gone too heavily led by the fact it's a business, and not how can you make the sport the best possible but how can we make the most money as a business. That's not how a sport should be run. It should never have been like that. And it is a shame."
He went on to say:
🗣️”Fans from five years ago, before Drive to Survive, would hate it. Fans nowadays like the personalities and the drivers and are not simply fans of Formula 1 as a whole sport. There's less interest in basically how the actual race goes, and more just has the driver done well or not. That's completely fine. But the biggest voice should always be the drivers, and that's not because we're selfish but because we have the best idea of how racing should be. And at the minute, we have very, very little say, and a lot more of what is done because if you can have Audi and other teams in it, it's a bigger win than the drivers being happy. I don't think Formula 1 is in a wobbly state. It will always be great. It can just be better." (via ESPN)