@QuinnyPig Even at Amazon, the only place I've ever seen this used is by VPs (and some L8s) who use it to ensure their schedule is only managed by their own admin. Anybody else deals with the same schedule chaos as every other company I've ever worked for.
@mikejulian And for a much longer-form treatment of the same issues, which we're seeing with Slack this week and every other online platform previously:
https://t.co/5awSM7fKaT
@QuinnyPig@codyogden@SlackHQ So far only one of my very small groups has been updated, so I haven't felt the full impact of this, but it does not look good.
@QuinnyPig I went to two high schools, in two countries, with different native languages. I was stronger in English and did quite well, but that was only for the final two years, as I was previously in a school environment where I rarely spoke English. How do I account for that?
@QuinnyPig And here's the latest "we don't need no stinking data!" right from the top. As one who worked at AWS for several years, I can count on zero fingers the number of improvements I was involved in that came about due to "serendipity."
https://t.co/yYSxMkymgy
@mikejulian I wish all apps gave the same option as SMS messaging, where I could choose to receive notifications about communication from only a specified group of people.
My default is notifications off. People who need to reach me for an emergency tend to know how to.
@mipsytipsy And more generally, it's for anybody who has done anything interesting and impactful with observability tools, techniques and frameworks. We encourage participation by first time speakers and those from under-represented groups.
@sontek@mipsytipsy@ahidalgosre@timotheo Shameless plug: If somebody is looking to do such a talk, or knows somebody who could do such a talk, I'm looking for speakers for the SCaLE Observability Track. Doesn't have to be specifically open-source related. Contact me for details: https://t.co/VNLCMz7TcI
@QuinnyPig@mikejulian@awscloud I had a few clients like that back in the day. There was a time when pretty much every production person in LA seemed to have done at least a brief stint in between other things at the mysterious entity always listed as "PEGI" on their resume. (Pl*yB*y Entertainment Group, Inc.)
@JoeBlubaugh@QuinnyPig@awscloud Varied widely, which is why sometimes even the $100k a year people could justify a project. But they'd only be able to do that once. Ongoing "small improvements" (something Amazon rightly focuses on), are generally not cost-effective without significant scale.
@QuinnyPig@awscloud Some of the more interesting projects were for the smaller clients. If they were able to survive it was because they understood that efficiency was not what they brought to the table and focused on other things, often interesting things. But scale pays better.
@QuinnyPig@awscloud I used to tell my smaller clients that at $10m a year, 10% gain may pay for the project the year you do it. At $1m spend, you may be able to justify a contractor to tweak things. At $100k spend, the savings you're likely to get from any project you can afford won't buy me lunch.