Will AI answer your questions if they clash with a leftist worldview?
Sanders and Casar want a government gate over advanced AI development.
Who decides what’s “safe” when politics walks through that gate?
Test dangerous tasks. Keep lawful thought out of the cage.
“The AI went rogue” is the world’s laziest alibi for a human-run test. Humans designed it, disabled safeguards, and saw containment fail. Put that in the scary headline.
The totally-organic AI doomsday warning went viral September 8.
Sanders and Casar announced their ban-and-pause plan September 3.
The “solution” just happened to be waiting before the panic arrived.
Read the timeline before handing government the keys to the future.
Another AI “safety” rule? Great. Name who paid for it, who wrote it, and which giant can afford it. If the answer keeps pointing to the same club, quit calling the gate a public service.
AI watchdogs don’t become neutral just because someone hands them a badge. Follow the money and the access behind the enforcers before you hand them control.
Bernie Sanders does not disappoint. Is he that dumb… or just a hypocrite?
“Take on Big Tech!”
Then demand rules only Big Tech can afford.
Brilliant. You’ve built the giants a wall and called it consumer protection.
And I wonder what happens when the far-left calls the shots on what is a “safe” use of AI?
AI-doomers have a hidden agenda. A law firm running AI on its own servers doesn’t need to rent that workload from Big Tech.
I wonder why we’re suddenly seeing the industry call for regulation on who can play ball?
A spontaneous AI panic? A risk group publicly sought creators, collaborated with journalists, and backed ads for regulation. That’s organized propaganda.
Spare me the “for the people” act. If the rule prices out everyone outside the club, it’s a moat.
Bernie calls it AI safety. Funny how his plan sends the giants a manageable bill and the little guy a bill he may never pay.
A criminal won’t give up his gun because you refuse to own one.
Why would hostile actors stop building AI because America hits pause?
Power will be used whether good people choose to exercise it or not.
America’s “largest steel plant” is coming to Iowa.
$15B. White House ribbon language. Defense-capable capacity.
Owner: Mesabi Metallics — controlled by India’s Essar Group.
Bringing jobs back home is great, but if ownership stays overseas, citizens remain the hired help.
Regulate-AI-into-oblivion idiocracy strikes again. Is it any wonder Bernie Sanders supports it? It hurts everyone but the trillion-dollar companies.
A giant AI lab adds a compliance department. A startup dies before its first sale.
Same rule. Very different winners.
If “safety” means only the giants can afford to build, we’re protecting their market share. Keep the door open for the guy who might beat them.
Does this mean I can sue the Whitehouse to require access to the briefing room? I want my press pass!
Perhaps we should all flood U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly with demands to grant us equal treatment under the law... better yet, equal outcomes lol
Crisis is profitable if you're buying. One family's foreclosure becomes an institutional buyer's rental.
After 2008, investors bought distressed homes in bulk. Watch why a crisis can leave ownership concentrated in the hands of people positioned to buy.
A prosecutor can change enforcement priorities without changing a single statute.
That's why a district attorney race most voters barely notice can matter so much. Watch how donor money reaches the enforcement side of the law.
Your child spends more than a thousand hours a year in a classroom. Who shapes what gets taught?
Watch how foundation money and federal grant incentives helped spread Common Core—and why that influence lasts beyond one school year.