Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge says newly released documents appear to corroborate claims that intelligence officials purposely withheld information about China’s election influence operations.
Herridge said one November 2020 email she reviewed referenced officials having “deliberately massaged” a presidential briefing to avoid direct links to the election.
HERRIDGE: “Well, I think it’s a very significant announcement. Not only what he said, but the fact that they are releasing these documents so that we can really fact check the claims we heard this evening.”
“I’ve been digging into the documents already and I found November 2020 email and it specifically states…it’s a conversation among intelligence officials…it specifically states that they have, ‘deliberately massaged’ one of our pending pdbs...”
“That’s the president’s daily brief, to avoid any direct links to the election.”
“And that is consistent with my reporting.”
“I understand the whistleblower complaint alleged, I think we’re now seeing the emails, that there was an intentional effort to suppress intelligence about China’s influence operations.”
“And this was, Katie, like a massive effort. What they call a multi domain operation. That means trade, it means diplomacy, it means open source information, it means social media.”
“So all the levers of power, China had to influence U.S. election.”
@C__Herridge@KatiePavlich
@TheMa78024@patgill69033215 Yes I read it. Sure but she can't eliminate the protection. Leftists are crazy and think killing a conservative is a good thing.
@J6Veteran Stop it. Ugg. Throwing this poor woman under the bus because she is concerned about her family. Even if you disagree with her decisons like I do, she doesnt deserve to lose her job because she fears for her family.
@AmyKremer Just because she fears for the safety of her family it doesnt mean she is being influenced. I dont like some of her opinions but that sometimes happens without it being because of a threat.
@catturd2 She has every right to defend and protect her family. That doesn't make her weak. No matter how much we dislike some of her decisions, she has the right to be safe from leftist loons!
They've been stealing elections for at least 15 to 20 years, not just here in the United States, but around the world. Now they're exposed and running out of options.
In the Georgia 2020 election at the State Farm Arena, we have them on video pulling out hidden suitcases full of ballots that were separate from all of the other ballots and running the same stacks of ballots through machines all throughout the night, with NO observers present, which is completely illegal, after they stopped the count, lied to observers, telling everyone they're going home.
We have multiple states and counties destroying evidence, no chain-of-custody documents, counterfeit ballots, dead people voting, 120% voter turnouts, IP addresses from outside the country confirmed communicating with our election machines, etc...
Members of our own government, the CIA, DHS, CISA, the EAC, all knew these machines and companies were compromised, but cleared them anyway for use in U.S. elections. That alone should tell you how deep and corrupt the system really is and what we are truly up against.
🎆 Happy 250th Birthday, America! 🇺🇸
Today, we're celebrating in style — lighting up the Brandenburg Gate in honor of 250 years of American independence.
My statement on the decision in the Mississippi ruling before the Supreme Court should highlight for you the difference between conservatives and the far left liberals that run today’s Democrat party:
While I disagree with Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett joining the three liberal justices to form the 5-4 majority in today’s SCOTUS ruling, we’re not going to try to delegitimize the Court, dox the justices or show up at their homes, picket in the streets, or make ridiculous calls to pack the Court in the future.
But just because the Court ruled the practice constitutional doesn’t mean we should allow it in our state. Next session, I call on the Mississippi Legislature to repeal the COVID-era law and require mail-in ballots to be received by the clerk by 5:00pm on Election Day in order to be counted.
Yes, I strongly disagree with the Court’s opinion - but I still respect the institution and the individuals who serve on it.