@StraightShootrr@BridgesIsBetter@KarlWuckert A couple of these I think have been misinterpreted but I didn’t know about a coupe of them so I’ll look into them. Thank you for engaging respectfully in your latter tweets
@BridgesIsBetter@StraightShootrr@KarlWuckert No that’s not true, my issue was with just hurled at a stranger without any substance to back it up because the whole point in my stance was that I’m willing to learn. I don’t claim to know everything my opinions shift based on the presentation of facts
@PawleSardano@JustTheTweets17@TPUSA Yes?… that’s the point I made in the prompt. TPUSA haven’t handled this security review well at all. Choosing an attempt at managing the I ptics over operational lessons in my opinion which can’t be good no matter what side of the debate you’re on
@StraightShootrr@BridgesIsBetter@KarlWuckert I’m neither. Low hanging fruit is debatable depending on who you ask and day of the week 🤔 nah but in all seriousness, don’t agree with everything she says and does, just this case is very questionable
@StraightShootrr@BridgesIsBetter@KarlWuckert People try and use this slur a lot, it’s lazy and deliberately ignorant of people to attempt to frame that as her point when she referred to this
@StraightShootrr@BridgesIsBetter@KarlWuckert Fascinating debate strategy so far. Where you repeat 'Nazi' several times, insert cheap slur, offer zero substance, repeat. Must be exhausting pretending that counts as an argument.
@StraightShootrr@BridgesIsBetter@KarlWuckert I’ve yet to see or hear her say anything that targets or hates all Jewish people. What’s your aim here? Are you trying to make a point, or do you just fall hurl insults the second someone has a different opinion?
@LionelMedia Exactly. You don't get to be gung ho about an immune star witness and then lock the defense out of his texts and deal details. Hand them over.
@daughtertruth25@RealCandaceO When the report was published, they implicitly endorsed legal statements framing the document as proof that UVU was solely to blame. Their posture reflects an organization acting defensively rather than transparently and they wonder why people don’t buy it 🤷🏽♂️
Hey @TPUSA / @TPAction / @tpusastudents:
Where is *YOUR* after-action report? Surely you did one, given the loss of your founder. Releasing that to the public would be a great act of transparency.
@CarriePrejean1 I’m sorry but anyone who thinks this is an open and shut case is wilfully ignorant, misinformed or hasn’t read this entire report. Damming
@Scottx900@LionelMedia@RealCandaceO I disagree and think she’s genuinely grieving the loss of her friend and says what she believes but respect your opinion.
@rgs2rs@NellerShalah@KarlWuckert I think there's more that will come out with this case. Will every theory turn out true? Obviously not.
But I reckon something will make this case feel less solid by trial's end. Disagreeing is fine, dismissing every question as evil or dishonest isn't the same thing.
@brake_911@LionelMedia@RealCandaceO But there are legitimate, unresolved questions about the prosecution's case. it's what should happen whenever a case has real holes and people can disagree, its the absolute ferocity of people when good faith questions are asked I have an issue with.
@brake_911@LionelMedia@RealCandaceO I think she said EK was complicit in pushing the Robinson narrative. I'm not saying I agree with everything she's ever said, and I'm not interested in the toxic Twitter arguments that dominate the real debates on this issue.