@Nox7hhsjj@47fucb4r8c69323 no. im positive the llm outputs are more "not wrong" (or perhaps... less wrong) than the humans, but "not wrong" and "correct" are very different in law, this exercise tests the former
@IlliquidInsight someone i knew fainted at work, hit his head, went to the ER. partner deadass asked him first thing how good the ER looks and if he cld attend a meeting from there
@musestoomuch@Ryan_Gasoline@GarrettPetersen to an extent that is unavoidable (think for billing etc). im assuming there is some polite fiction of "i dont think about who knows my adress" and "dont remind people that the store clerk who has to know their adress might be a creep as a person"
@Ryan_Gasoline@GarrettPetersen@musestoomuch i agree; a situation where ir might be ok to ask someone out at work is rare in the first place. basically only if there was flirtation or "good vibes" beforehand
@Ryan_Gasoline@GarrettPetersen@musestoomuch its not complicated: wait until the transaction is complete so she doesnt feel beholden, but in the store so its in an environment she has control over. what the guy in the ot did was entering her non-public sphere withiut (even implicit) invitation, which is naturally creepy
@GarrettPetersen@Ryan_Gasoline@musestoomuch if youre a customer and want to ask an employee out (which u shldnt do if there werent signs), you should do it after services and pay were rendered, but in the store
@Ken67547214@Chaos80397926 one of my admittedly rw coded pet peeves is that we slipped in esg privileges into regulation post-gfc to drastically reduce capital requirements for 'green' investments, so theres about 4T in instruments that are about 2x-3x as leveraged as the rest
@47fucb4r8c69323 second paragraph isnt quite right i think. it was not a general separation of intention and speech; it was more that all capacity for consideration of intent was allocated to either knee-jerk assumed negative intent or proponents of one political interpretation
@GGCanto@BonneDroite some of my moslem friends acknowledge this and still refuse to eat pork bc they don't want to deal w the cognitive load of reconciling their practices with it and tbh valid