An emotion charged David Pocock read from a UN Report that said 20,000 children had been killed by the IDF with another 40,000 wounded.
They shot at children’s limbs for target practice.
What do supporters of Israel think of this?
Our Govt says nothing and treats them as an ally!
My article on AUKUS.
AUKUS is about madness, militarism and money. Turning Australia into a US military base, sacrificing our sovereignty, and enriching retired politicians, military and public servants while battlers struggle to put food on the table
https://t.co/j3cvT6oWLd
Absolute silence from MSM on the most important speech on democracy and the will of the people Thank you @DavidPocock
Tax the gas 25%
Make Data centres work for Australia
Accountability for lobbyists
Pauline Hanson has today insisted she was “not aware of the content” of her vile cartoon—but watch her yesterday tell Jacqui Lambie to ‘get over it’ and ‘have a laugh’ about ‘women suffering from this thing’🙄
No bigger liar or hypocrite than Hanson. #auspol
David Speers & Patricia Karvelas are quick to call out Social Media as a source of extremism but you'll never hear them single out the biggest source, the right-wing media.
The media has normalised #HateSpeech:
- 3AW/2GB
- Sky News
- Herald Sun
- Seven/Nine
#auspol#HelenHaines
Helen Haines is pro-Palestine, one of the best in Parliament, but these genocide cookers from AJA leverage the tragedy for their shabby political advantage
@AlboMP
You are wrong to blame only social media when tragedy strikes
In 2020, 500K Aussies & 2 x PMs signed a petition for a media royal commission
You chose to ignore that when you became PM
That choice led directly to the rise of One Nation & a divided nation
🐝
#auspol
When you mock a Senator for her medical condition , and your supporters have rallied outside Vic Parliament with gallows and noises, don’t pretend to be concerned about violence against MP’s.
Just shut the fuck up.
#auspol
Corporate forces are bankrolling One Nation's surge, and the payoff could be $219m in public funding if current support levels remain.
The party sells itself as anti-establishment, but its backers are the establishment. Various powerful corporate sectors, including banking, hotels, mining and fossil fuels, all get a mention in the One Nation space.
"One Nation is commonly referred to as an anti-establishment populist party, but in reality it looks more like a clutch of mining and corporate lobbies in a trenchcoat."
https://t.co/vzGsJ712W8
Why is @DavidShoebridge virtually the only Australian politician fighting the obvious and very dangerous national security threat to Australia from Israel’s spying and political interference?
Dr Helen Haines is smart, kind, and successful—the exact opposite of Pauline Hanson, which is why One Nation feels threatened.
They tried to bomb Australians on Invasion Day and now they’re targeting our politicians. Right-wing extremism has no place in this country.
Penny Wong has been slammed for her glaring double standards: completely ignoring the thousands of protestors in Paris while somehow standing with imaginary ones in Iran.
Absolute hypocritical trash!
"Sydney Water - data centres to consume 25% of Sydney’s drinking water by 2035." Toxic water comes out the other end.
Missing - obligations on disclosure and toxic waste
Claudia Weisenberger
#auspol
https://t.co/lwAxVQ4524
Australian police are rolling out Cellebrite's Israeli phone cracking software, and now another Israeli tech firm has turned online ads against our agencies. We need an urgent review of all surveillance companies operating here and the risks they pose to privacy and public data.
While Australia stared at the crippled dead cat they just threw on the table, Labor and the Liberals were quietly passing legislation that should have been front-page news.
The dead cat was Jordon Steele-John.
I don’t know for sure who threw it there. But I know what happened in Parliament while everyone was looking.
On Monday 12 October, Labor and the Coalition backed the Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026.
Sounds harmless, doesn’t it?
It creates a legal framework for more than $1.4 BILLION a year in government payments to healthcare providers, including corporate-owned businesses.
But buried in that legislation are powers to let ministers decide payment rules, demand records, share personal information, investigate providers, recover money and authorise computers to make decisions, including decisions requiring judgement.
Parliament’s own Human Rights Committee had already warned that these information powers could seriously interfere with Australians’ privacy and that the safeguards might not be good enough.
They passed it anyway.
Then came the Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026.
More computer-made decisions. More use of income data to calculate family assistance and child support. New powers to change certain decisions already under review by the Administrative Review Tribunal.
Some provisions improve review rights. Others expand automated administration.
After Robodebt, you might reasonably expect Parliament to examine every one of those powers with a microscope.
And then there was the Aged Care Legislation Amendment (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aged Care Commissioner and Other Measures) Bill 2026.
This changes aged-care subsidies, accommodation deposits, means-testing arrangements and government debt recovery.
It also establishes a limited pathway for reconsidering certain aged-care assessments.
Not the unfettered right for qualified assessors to override an algorithm when it gets someone’s needs wrong.
After months of pressure, the government finally agreed on Thursday to an independent review of its aged-care assessment system.
Now consider what we’ve been uncovering at Enough Australia.
Private equity buying up healthcare businesses. nib acquiring independent NDIS plan managers. Publicly funded services being consolidated into corporate groups. Governments increasingly relying on data, payment rules and automated administration.
These laws do not hand Medicare or the NDIS to nib. But they help build the administrative and funding environment in which large corporate operators can do business.
We, the public, pays for it. The government writes the rules. Private businesses can receive the money. And increasingly, computer systems help decide who qualifies, what gets paid and what happens when the records don’t agree.
Labor and the Coalition did not agree on every amendment, particularly in aged care. But they supported key parts of this expanding administrative machinery.
And who was sitting in Parliament on Monday warning about exactly this?
Jordon Steele-John.
On Tuesday, he supported an amendment seeking to abolish the controversial aged-care assessment tool. Labor voted it down.
On Thursday, the government announced a review of that system.
By Thursday afternoon, the headlines were about Jordon himself.
The decade old allegations against him deserve a fair, independent investigation. So do the decisions being made about the rest of us.
Because while everyone was staring at the dead cat, Parliament was deciding who controls the money, who controls the information and how much power human beings will have when the computers get it wrong.
That’s the story we should be reading. https://t.co/lmNT8zW5wn
A video that Netanyahu does not want the world to see
Let the world know by sharing this
Tens of thousands of anti-Zionist rabbis and Jews gathered in the Barclays Center in New York City to say that the Zionist regime is a criminal and occupying gang and does not represent the Jews.
Way time we scrapped the word ‘settlers.’ They are nothing of the sort. They are Israeli terrorist thugs, illegally seizing land that is not theirs and occasionally murdering the owners.