@FartDegree@IFK_0mega @KirPinkFury At this point in the Switch 1 life, it had maybe one more first party AAA game than Switch 2 does today. It just happened that the 1-2 punch of BotW and Odyssey were killer.
@Mrplaystation73@NintyPrime They all work because they built a compatibility layer. If you ran a switch 1 game on a switch 2 without that layer, it wouldn't work. It's a different architecture.
@TheMetalSmark@spatzzzleee@Stealth40k Look I love classic 3D Zelda & OOT is my favorite game of all time, and I'm currently replaying Wind Waker. But in realistic. BotW sold more than ALL previous 3D Zelda games - combined - even if you include remasters and rereleases.
@trickydickpol@ReasonTheology@Pontifex Jesus did not say we must follow the laws of the earth. In fact it's church teaching that we can't follow an unjust law. No one is saying we can't have immigration laws. But Church teaching says that they have to be just laws (welcoming by nature) and be enforced *humanely*.
@AndrewBurch14@ReasonTheology Yes I know what the encyclical says. Intrinsic evil isn't *more* evil than non intrinsic evils. That misunderstands the nature of intrinsic evils.
Evil is evil. And unjust wars are evil.
Oh, and threatening genocide is threatening an intrinsic evil.
@michele_co23092@jwhaifa I mean, that statement of yours is an affront to our Constitutional Republic. There's only one party intent on tearing up the constitution, and that's the party currently in power.
@Darth_Fidelis@TD_Barrett@ReasonTheology It's precisely wrong. The prohibition against Contraception is the application of specific moral principles around the dignity of marriage and the designed purposes of sex. It is not, in and of itself, a moral principle. Any first year theology student would know that.
@TD_Barrett@ReasonTheology That is not true. Contraception is indeed an application of specific moral principles. You don't really know moral theology.