@benpetahtikvah@uhshanti@elaifresh The people pulling the trigger had zero capacity to determine who was around when the explosives were set off. Please explain how you think this can be precise?
@ObserverLizard2@segmentata@KarolusWangus@matthew_petti You have posted in nearly every thread on this topic. Have you considered that maybe you are wrong? Like genuinely sat down and thought about this from a non-partisan viewpoint.
@Miner49er18@SassyE The solution no one will like is that AI solves this. Just give everyone the option of AI school or real school. No chance the disruptive kids would actually chose real school. They self select out, autonomy is preserved, everyone who gives a fuck wins.
@HabCorpLinguist@AltDicta You’re going to have a very fun time in 5 years. I’d start booking your therapy sessions now. Maybe you’re callous enough to survive, but when you get forcibly shaken from your genocidal haze, it’s going to be rough.
@havenmtg@Naozymandias@GayOliveGarden I’d argue it’s still strictly better than Hexing Squelcher, again you don’t care about its capacity to protect itself on entrance. But I’m going to get hit with another 😏, from the “engagement beyond surface level memery is not cool” crowd.
@havenmtg@Naozymandias@GayOliveGarden No it’s strictly better, you’re reaching. You’re right that it has better protection, but you’re not running the card for the protection it provides itself on entrance.
@havenmtg@Naozymandias@GayOliveGarden Regardless, that’s not what sidegrade means. It’s a strictly better effect than “can’t be countered” and not limited to your turn only. Both of those attributes make sidegrade a hyperbolic description.
@havenmtg@Naozymandias@GayOliveGarden Ok so what happens if I cast a lightning bolt in response to a cast of a game winning spell on this guy w/ a counter ready and waiting?
@Clipart_Bear@shoshovelvel@postdocforever This isn’t debating whether the earth is flat. It’s pretty difficult to argue that there is no real issue to analyze here.
@shvllwebvgvn The strongest argument and I think why it is coming to a head now is not that it comes to life, it’s that the current buggy mess inadvertently acts in ways that are harmful.
@politilols@heterocera_gaze@reset_by_peer Ok sure, but the core of the issue here is financials. They might have solved a millennium problem, but don’t have a clear path toward sustainability. Slowdown is plausible as a means of achieving that.
@politilols@heterocera_gaze@reset_by_peer This was still equity investing tho, no? Also I think two other factors make it meaningfully different (1) the ecosystem built around it and (2) the fact that the US economy requires AI to pan out right otherwise we will end up in a serious recession.
@politilols@heterocera_gaze@reset_by_peer Uber and Spotify aren’t good comps. They weren’t locked into a circular financing hell. I see your point, but they aren’t actually in bed with VCs, they are in bed with traditional debt finance at this point.
@shoshovelvel@Clipart_Bear@postdocforever This guy is dressing up his disinterest with the attempts to solve the issue as a take. Honestly, it’s just anti intellectualism. They just aren’t interested in this issue and hate tech.
@Rabadash2 If you’re telling me a bot couldn’t, right now, pig butcher large swathes of the public into something horrible in the real world, I’d be surprised. The hurdle here is really intentionality.