You guys are some of the dumbest people in the world to not consider that I’ve been sitting on Charlie’s Aspen video for the last 7 months. I am light years ahead of you toothless cogs who deserve nothing but the resentment you have earned from the entire world.
Since you are now shamelessly attempting to use an out of context text from 2021 to pretend that Charlie wanted to change the event from the YOUNG Women’s Leadership conference to a BoomerCon NagFest, here is the relevant portion from his Aspen donor event, (captured just 3 weeks before he died) where he carefully laid out his vision for the organization for over 2 hours. Please note Charlie’s explanation that the past and future vision was for YOUNG women to gather at YWLS.
…But I’m sure he changed his mind a week later, right?
@Hondo_Celtics@ringer@AdamFriedland I stopped after 30 seconds with this guy. Bill's opening 50 minutes were good though, although he completely glossed over KAT's pre-Knick success. (4 time All-Star, 2 time ALL NBA)
Cry harder Andrew.
Everything that’s happening right now is a direct result of your own decisions. This was completely avoidable. From the very beginning, you chose to play games instead of being transparent.
YOU introduced an audio clip that sounded AI-generated and directly contradicted everything Charlie had ever said publicly. When people asked for the raw video so they could verify it, YOU spent months dodging the request. Instead of simply releasing the footage, YOU ran to the Daily Mail with a “trust us, we saw it” article. Then, when YOU finally released something, it wasn’t the original raw file — it was a heavily edited, spliced-together version with an added audio track.
And now you want to act shocked that people don’t trust you?
You keep claiming we’re “moving the goalposts,” but the reality is you’ve never operated in good faith since Charlie was killed. You’ve ignored direct questions, gaslit the public, sent third parties to do your dirty work, and run coordinated campaigns to discredit anyone asking legitimate questions.
Let’s also clear something up: the majority of people investigating this aren’t leftists who hated Charlie. Most of us were his supporters. We wanted Turning Point to succeed after his death. What destroyed that possibility wasn’t our questions — it was your refusal to answer them honestly.
Yes, people get things wrong during an investigation. That’s how this works. But the difference is we’re actually trying to find the truth. You, on the other hand, have done everything possible to avoid it. That’s why the public has turned on you. Not because we’re attacking Charlie’s widow — but because you’ve made it impossible to trust anything you say.
@PNWthistle@buckleycarlson@BlakeSNeff Blake has not handled the aftermath of this traumatic situation very well.
There is no way he had foreknowledge of it, but I am sure the whole thing keeps him up at night.
@UnseenWyoGal@imjuliburns@AwakenWithJP@DLoesch I never labeled anyone's opinion as disgusting, and then used my Christianity as a reason for doing so.
Also, I never said "We're told not to be hypocritical in judgment", and then proceeded to be completely judgemental.
But whatever. Have a good day, mam.
@UnseenWyoGal@imjuliburns@AwakenWithJP@DLoesch Oh now, JP is being "outrageously" disgusting.
And you have added a new qualifier about "making money" from these comments.
So it is ok, as long as you don't make money?
How about we don't label people's opinions as disgusting? Try that.
@UnseenWyoGal@imjuliburns@AwakenWithJP@DLoesch I am sure if anyone took the time to go back through your replies they would find plenty of "disgusting" comments, takes and replies.
So yes, please do not be hypocritical in your judgement.