@taylortttroy@SocialistMormon Isn't it the opposite? Not only is the electoral college the only case of the two where the state you voted in matters, but winner-takes-all means that your vote contributed nothing to the tally that mattered unless your candidate won the state
@wachelreeks For example, player A spends turns 1-4 ramping. They have no creatures in play or interaction.
Player B gets an above average start and kills player A on turn 5 with their non-trampling Voltron commander.
Did player B violate bracket 3s guidelines?
@wachelreeks I think safe turns can use clarity on two things.
1. Does expecting to play at least X turns mean in all games or in most games?
2. Should I expect my safe turns even if I make no meaningful counterplay against my opponents? Is even a goldfish entitled to safe turns?
@thedentde@Thiss_Youu Funnily enough, I think pleading the fifth is completely reasonable and doesn't inherently incriminate anyone. But apparently Myrna does, and so it's funny to see her selective outrage and poor, contradictory worldview laid out so plainly.
@cartohead1964@BkHart1@ItsMrsRabbitToU You said a different thing here than before. Are you dodging the point or is your reading comprehension at a sub elementary school level?
@veryonusthaguy@LiamFelder@jupiterbrandos People who want to play a powerful format still want balance. Also, nice job moving the goalpost from "picture I don't like" to actual balance considerations. That post was probably very heavy!
@benbackupbackup@vasalex93 Hey, so the refutation is the direct quote from the study about the selection criteria that is different than the selection criteria that you are claiming. I hope this helps!
@ChiStyleGaming Tbh I think this card is kinda cheeks. 6 mana cards that does nothing on ETB and whose main use-case is to essentially make buttloads more mana in a very uncontrolled way are generally not good.
If this card ends up good, it's because miracle works around timing restrictions.