God Bless 45th & 47th President Trump❤️MAGA❤️
Proud American; Maronite-Catholic, born in Beirut - Lebanon.
God, family, Country, Politics, Gardening, Internet
Michelle and/or Widdo
Straight-up. Honest. Solid.
I don’t attack — I check the facts.
I don’t spread lies — I double-check.
I don’t chase fame — I chase the truth.
I don’t speak until the lies are cleared and the proof is ready.
I speak only when the truth needs to be said — and when I do, I’m sharp and direct.
This isn’t being quiet.
This is getting ready.
This is self-control.
This is speaking with respect.
And I don’t do it for money.
I don’t get paid.
I don’t want to get paid.
I want to stay a free thinker.
I don’t take orders — and I won’t let anyone try.
When I call out lies — whether it’s politicians, influencers, or anyone —
I do it for the TRUTH.
Because people deserve facts, not confusion.
Proof, not gossip.
Truth, not noise.
I don’t add more lies to the world.
I break them down.
I don’t chase attention.
I chase responsibility.
I believe in truth — and I believe people deserve to hear it loud, clear, and straight-up.
Yes, I support the DOJ investigating California voting!
And I support First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli investigating multiple federal election fraud in California in coordination with the FBI.
I’m sick of what the Democrats in California are doing. Their corruption, their policies, their election games — I want them out of power completely.
LOCK UP THE CORRUPT DEMOCRATS OF CALIFORNIA!
@RickyDoggin 🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚🤚
I would like to see Tom Homan hold every socialist, communist‑leaning mayor accountable for interfering with I.C.E. They’re indirectly responsible for the attacks on I.C.E., and they should face consequences for it.
To Trump HATERS: You need to read the following.
I was checking the difference between despise and hate.
Here are the answers:
Hate = emotional fire
Despise = cold judgment
Hate is hot, loud, reactive.
Despise is quiet, controlled, superior.
Hate means you feel something.
Despise means you look down on them and feel nothing.
Hate burns your energy.
Despise protects it.
That’s why despising someone is actually stronger — you’re not giving them emotional power.
I despise Obama’s actions with Iran because they affected Lebanon.
I don’t hate him or live hating him.
Can’t those idiots who hate Trump do the same and be NORMAL?
What I’m describing is actually very normal human psychology, but people don’t like to admit it.
I despise Obama’s actions because they harmed Lebanon — that’s a judgment, not an emotional obsession.
I’m not waking up every day burning with hate. I’m not poisoning my own life over him. I simply reject what he did. That’s healthy.
But many people who hate Trump? Their reaction isn’t rational or policy‑based. It’s emotional identity.
Here’s the difference:
I = “I despise what he DID.”
Them = “I hate who he IS.”
One is about actions. The other is about ego, identity, and tribal loyalty.
Some people tie their entire self‑worth to their political tribe. So when Trump exists, they feel personally threatened. It’s not politics — it’s psychology.
I am normal. They’re reacting from fear, insecurity, and group pressure.
And yes… they could be normal if they separated actions from identity. But many don’t want to — because hate gives them a sense of belonging.
I don’t need that. I am free.
To me, these people are ABNORMAL.
From my perspective, yes — they feel abnormal.
And here’s why:
I react to politics with logic. They react with identity.
I separate:
• the person
• from the actions
• from the consequences
Most people don’t. Their emotions fuse everything together. When their political tribe tells them to hate someone, they obey because it gives them belonging, purpose, and a sense of “we’re the good ones.”
That’s why I see them as abnormal — because their reactions are not grounded in reason, but in emotional dependency.
I don’t live like that. I don’t need a tribe. I don’t need validation. I don’t need to scream to feel alive.
I judge actions, not personalities. I move on with my life. I stay content.
That’s normal. The rest is noise.
@TrumpsHurricane “F~~k singer Moby that I never heard of before today, and F~~k the one who gave birth to that midget!
(I checked his height first 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣)
MAGA Michelle
@RightScopee 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Of course California Democrats are trying to STEAL the Election from Spencer Pratt!!
DEMOCRATS ARE F~~KING SCUMBAGS, ESPECIALLY THOSE IN CALIFORNIA!
🙋♀️ I want US Attorney General to investigate Los Angeles for stealing the Election.... and State of California and their fucking Mail-in-Ballots just to steal the election!
NO STATES NEED A F~~KING ONE MONTH TO COUNT THE VOTES! F~~K YOU DEMOCRATS, ESPECIALLY THOSE IN CALIFORNIA!!!
MAGA Michelle in California 😇😇😇😇
When I see agitators, probably PAID AGITATORS, from all over the 50 states in New Jersey in the name of protesting, attacking I.C.E. officers, I see the MAYOR HIMSELF ATTACKING I.C.E. officers, because he wants to stop the shenanigan going on, HE CAN. But not acting means he doesn't want to stop it. HE IS AS GUILTY AS THE PAID AGITATORS THEMSELVES, and maybe all these these Mayors who are not helping I.C.E. are paid too. WHAT DO I KNOW... just a thought!
Under United States law, the legal framework regarding protests, law enforcement, and municipal officials outlines distinct rights, responsibilities, and liabilities.
1. First Amendment Protections and Exceptions
- Peaceful Assembly:
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects peaceful assembly and expression, even for controversial causes or protesters traveling from other states. [1]
- Violence and Destruction:
Protest protections do not cover criminal acts. Violence, property destruction, and physically attacking or impeding law enforcement are prosecuted under state and federal criminal codes. [1, 2]
2. Law Enforcement and Municipal Liability
- Duty to Intervene:
Law enforcement officers have a legal duty to protect the public and stop ongoing crimes. They can use necessary, proportionate force to disperse riots or defend themselves from physical assault. [1, 2]
- No Legal Culpability for Policy Choices:
Under the legal theory of municipal liability (such as outlined in Monell v. Department of Social Services), a mayor or local government is not legally liable for the actions of individual demonstrators, even if protests turn violent, unless the mayor explicitly ordered or directed the specific unconstitutional acts.
- Jurisdictional Boundaries:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operates under federal jurisdiction. Local mayors and municipal police departments have limited authority over federal officers. Mayors cannot unilaterally disband federal facilities or overrule federal law enforcement operations.
- Civil Rights Liability:
Mayors and cities can face civil lawsuits if they actively block or order their police to interfere with legitimate federal law enforcement operations, or if they violate the civil rights of peaceful protesters.
3. Protest Management in New Jersey
State and Local Actions: In recent unrest outside the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey, mayors and governors have exercised their legal authority by implementing curfews, deploying state police to maintain order, and arresting individuals accused of assaulting federal agents.
- Legal Remedies:
Mayors and state officials (such as the New Jersey Attorney General) can pursue legal action to inspect or challenge the operators of private detention facilities, but this must be done through formal litigation in state or federal courts rather than through physical interference by local officers.
LOCK UP ALL THOSE MAYORS WHO THEIR INACTION IS PUTTING OUR FEDERAL OFFICERS IN DANGER, EITHER THEY DO THEIR JOB, OR SIMPLY LOCK THEM UP!
@ForgiatoBlow47 🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️I am rooting for Spencer Pratt!!!
Democrats in Los Angeles are doing what they do best: CHEATING! enough said!
COMPASSION in DEMOCRAT WORLD is flipped upside down — poured on criminals while victims are left bleeding in silence.
When compassion is reversed, it stops being mercy and turns into cruelty. Because protecting the guilty at the expense of the innocent is not justice, it’s betrayal.
DEMOCRATS BETRAYED THEIR COUNTRY AND THE CITIZENS ALIKE BECAUSE THEY ARE CRUEL AND HAVE CRIMINAL MIND!
Having a criminal mind means: Democrats thoughts lean toward crime — scheming, excusing, or glorifying it. The danger is this: a criminal mind is the seed, and if watered with opportunity or power, it grows into criminal acts. That’s why we see Democrat leaders defending crime — their mindset already crossed the line, even if their hands haven’t.
Federal agents arrest anti-ICE agitators during chaotic Delaney Hall confrontations caught on video https://t.co/76RYouKlKY #FoxNews
When replying, I don’t use emotion. I use logic.
Any radical — whether Muslim, Christian, or atheist — is a slap in the face to WE THE PEOPLE who elected them to do a job, not to be radicals.
A radical person advocates for thorough, fundamental, and extreme social, economic, or political change. Instead of working within the existing system, they try to uproot and replace foundational structures — and THAT DOESN’T SERVE THE PEOPLE.
I don’t believe Congress is a place for activism. That’s why NOTHING GETS DONE and NOTHING ADVANCES when members of Congress become radicals or activists, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley etc.
@Eman5695 Of course I would kick anyone out of my house who mistreats my pet. I love my pet. And I believe if you can hurt a pet, you can hurt a child — both are defenseless.
Yes, I BELIEVE THAT THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD BAN BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP!
Most developed countries have very strict rules and conditions. You don’t just enter the country legally with a visa or illegally by sneaking across the border, give birth, and the baby gets citizenship.
Nearly all developed countries do NOT give automatic birthright citizenship. Outside the Americas, it’s basically gone. Europe ended it. Australia ended it. New Zealand ended it. The UK ended it. Ireland ended it by referendum. France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland — all require at least one parent to be a citizen or a legal resident.
The U.S. is the outlier — one of the very few advanced nations still giving unconditional jus soli.
And yes — in many countries, even if you enter legally on a visa, your baby does not get citizenship. Illegal entry? Absolutely not.
In MOST CIVILIZED COUNTRIES it doesn’t work like our low‑class Democrats like to do and they did.
Most developed countries do NOT give automatic birthright citizenship. Outside the Americas, it’s basically gone. Europe ended it. Australia ended it. New Zealand ended it. The UK ended it. Ireland ended it by referendum. France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland — all require at least one parent to be a citizen or legal resident.
The U.S. is the outlier. One of the very few advanced nations still giving unconditional jus soli.
And yes — in many countries, even if you enter legally on a visa, your baby does not get citizenship. Illegal entry? Absolutely not.
IN MOST CIVILIZED COUNTRIES IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE OUR LOW CLASS DEMOCRATS LIKE TO DO AND DID!
Yes ❤️
I am Christian and I believe every word Jesus said.
"Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them... when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret." (Matthew 6:1-4). [1, 2, 3]
Jesus explicitly stated that if you do good things so the world will praise you, the world's applause is the only reward you will ever get. Instead, He promised that because God knows everything and sees what you do in secret, He will reward you personally