₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬

#ChristFollower✝️ 𝙲օ-Fօʊռɖɛʀ & ᗰί𝚜тɾɛ𝚜𝚜 σƒ @MadhousePuddins♦️@SaucyByNature🫦 #HorrozyCreator📽️ #BioWomensRightsMatter🚺 #SaveOurKids🛡️ #LGBAlliance

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

Disliking me is valid. I probably confronted you on your poor behavior while everyone else just accepted it.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 No skin off my back.

Cope and seethe.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 If you want to worship Satan, it doesn't bother me. The only person you hurt is yourself. 😂

Still coping and seething? 🤣

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@SerioJoshehe A man

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@RockinRina @Gaynotqueer1 *Trans identifying females

Someone who is trans and identifies as a woman

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 Cope and seethe.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 I’m not spreading misinformation. You refuse to look up the laws in your state. I know the laws in mine.

Keep being a whiny-ass bitch instead of taking accountability.

Again, cope and seethe.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@soyalbertsmith @BuckAngel Good riddance.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 It’s not my job to educate myself because I’m not the one bitching.

Cope and seethe.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 Post your state laws and prove otherwise if you insist on dying on this hill, or do you just want to bitch and complain and make insinuations? 🙄

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 Look up your state laws instead of bitching about something you haven't bothered to research.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

Your inability to comprehend is obvious when the conclusion’s first paragraph and last sentence state:

“prenatal hormone(s) … provide causal evidence for the effect of prenatal hormones on sexual orientation …. although they do not translate to gender identity.

Could you cope any harder? 😂🤣😂🤣

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@miaoftheshire, your lack of intelligence is astounding when the conclusion’s first paragraph and last sentence state:

“prenatal hormone(s) … provide causal evidence for the effect of prenatal hormones on sexual orientation …. although they do not translate to gender identity.

Could you cope any harder? 😂🤣😂🤣

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

This is a 2018 review article by Charles Roselli pulling together what science knows about whether biology shapes gender identity and sexual orientation.

The difference matters:

A study (primary research) is when researchers collect new data — run an experiment, scan brains, survey people, sequence genes — and report original results. The papers cited inside this article are studies: LeVay measuring hypothalamus size, Hamer’s X-chromosome linkage work, the twin studies, etc.

A review is one author surveying and synthesizing what existing studies have already found. Roselli didn’t generate new data here; he read the literature, organized it by theme (genes, hormones, neuroanatomy, birth order), and offered his assessment of where the evidence stands. You can spot it from the structure — no methods section, no participants, no new results, just an introduction, thematic discussion, and conclusion, all built on citations to other people’s work.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@Miaoftheshire @faradayfollies @daniellismore It isn't a study. There is no methodology section, which is necessary for it to be considered a study. 🤦🏾‍♀️

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@Miaoftheshire @faradayfollies @daniellismore It literally states they included 380 transgender women and 344 control male subjects.

There is no mention of transgender men; therefore, the study is flawed and should not be used to conclude what they state it does.

Cope harder.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 In the United States, every state with an abortion ban or restriction includes a legal exception permitting abortion if it is necessary to save the life of the pregnant mother.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@TPetti87 @SonofCornPop @SophiaRose95749 In the United States, every state with an abortion ban or restriction includes a legal exception permitting abortion if it is necessary to save the life of the pregnant mother.

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@Miaoftheshire @faradayfollies @daniellismore Why did the sample size exclude trans men?

Subject-control analysis included 380 transgender women and 344 control male subjects.

[Labour Heartlands @Labourheartland]

The only truth in that post was you saying, "Some people are too stupid or too frightened to want to learn".

You obviously fall into that category... now read and listen in...

STOP USING PEOPLE WITH DSD AS PROPS FOR GENDER IDEOLOGY

This is Nick, better known as That XXY Guy.

Nick has a Difference of Sex Development, a medical condition. He is also a man. A male. And he is furious that activists keep dragging people like him into arguments about transgender identity as though their medical conditions prove that human sex is imaginary, fluid, or somehow no longer male and female.

His message is blunt because it needs to be: people with DSD are not a mythical “third sex”. They are not political exhibits. They are not a convenient shield to be held up every time someone points out that sex is real.

Nick is male. His XXY condition does not make him less male. It does not make him “both sexes”. And it certainly does not exist to prop up an ideology he does not consent to represent.

More importantly, this is not Nick standing alone.

The UK charity dsdfamilies, which supports children, young people and families living with Differences of Sex Development, has repeatedly warned against conflating DSD with transgender identity. DSD concerns complex physical differences in sex development. Transgender identity is a separate issue entirely.

After the Supreme Court ruling, dsdfamilies warned against the “oversimplification, misrepresentation and weaponisation of DSD/Intersex by third parties”, stating that such misuse increases stigma and may discourage people from accessing support.

Read that again.

The people activists keep using as their biological trump card are telling them to stop.

This is what ideological capture looks like: people with real medical conditions are spoken over, misrepresented and reduced to poster children for a political argument they never asked to carry.

So listen to Nick.

Stop claiming people with DSD abolish the reality of male and female. Stop pretending their conditions are interchangeable with transgender identity. Stop using other people’s bodies, medical needs and lived experience as ammunition for an ideology that does not even respect what they are saying.

People with DSD need proper medical support, dignity, understanding and a voice of their own.

They do not need activists appropriating their conditions to deny biological reality. #sexisbinary

[₍^. .^₎⟆ mischiefinmagic ˏˋ ✞ ˎˊ 🇺🇸 🇵🇭 🇳🇬 @mischiefinmagic]

@at_revenge The sample size is also quite small and excluded trans men: Subject-control analysis included 380 transgender women and 344 control male subjects.