Miss. Information

Science communicator. Topical science explained. Misinformation debunked.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

New CDC report reveals sleep epidemic in America!

https://t.co/XJjjFHakcG

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@Nickisbackbaby Pretty simple really.
1. It didn’t disappear, just reduced the number of cases
2. The flu is spread the same way as COVID, so social distancing and masking also decreased the spread of the flu
3. When these measures were removed, the incidence of the flu increased again

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@ukwomenriseup @hashjenni Even if this were true, it would still be significantly less than the number of women and girls whose lives have already been destroyed by predators

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@RapidResponse47 @joerogan @POTUS So when a random podcaster wants to use psychedelic drugs with no safety data it’s immediately approved. But when scientists recommend vaccines with decades of data and clinical trials proving safety and efficacy they are poisoning us. Make it make sense.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@SecKennedy @WhiteHouse @joerogan So when a random podcaster wants to use psychedelic drugs with no safety data it’s immediately approved. But when scientists recommend vaccines with decades of data and clinical trials proving safety and efficacy they are poisoning us. Make it make sense.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@WhiteHouse @HHSGov So when a random podcaster wants to use psychedelic drugs with no safety data it’s immediately approved.

But when scientists recommend vaccines with decades of data and clinical trials proving safety and efficacy they are poisoning us.

Make it make sense.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@EricLDaugh So when a random podcaster wants to use psychedelic drugs with no safety data it’s immediately approved. But when scientists recommend vaccines with decades of data and clinical trials proving safety and efficacy they are poisoning us. Make it make sense.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@calleymeans Well since Trump now claims that diet soda kills cancer, we must be saving millions of lives by serving it to cancer patients!

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@terrific_kid @dalepartridge Do you have any evidence for this claim?

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

Did Artemis II really go around the moon?

https://t.co/gdLBkidq0R

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@toobaffled This data is completely misleading. It simply shows the number of reports increasing, which makes sense when more reports were being made during COVID. When looked at in context, this is clearly not what happened.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@thehealthb0t

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@GuntherEagleman Does anyone else think the guy he’s ‘healing’ looks a lot like Epstein?

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@PeterSweden7 Man: Says a big number
Scientists: “Where’s the data?”
Him: “Trust me bro, it’s huge.”

Meanwhile actual evidence (millions of doses, real-world studies, excess mortality data) keeps showing vaccines reduce deaths.

Wild how real data never trends, but big scary numbers do.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@kelleybauer68 @NicHulscher Literally in the actual peer-reviewed journals.
For example, this study of 22 MILLION people showed that vaccinated people were 74% less likely to die from COVID than unvaccinated people.

https://t.co/A3akBfH1py

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@MidwesternDoc And yet all he ‘references’ in your ‘article’ are just random stories you’ve supposedly heard from people. I’m not sure you know what a peer-reviewed study actually is.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@covie_93 To be fair, there is significant overlap between anti-vaxers and moon landing deniers.

On a completely unrelated note, there is also significant overlap between the smartest bears and the dumbest people.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@DawnsMission To save their lives, Dawn.

[Miss. Information @Miss_Info_sci]

@NicHulscher Some of these ‘references’ are just blog posts from conspiracy theorists. Others are from made up journals whose purpose is to spread misinformation. The rest either don’t say what you claim they’re saying or have since been retracted or debunked due to their poor methodology.