👁️Police are deploying Orwellian live facial recognition in #WalthamForest and #Islington today.
This tech is an enormous expansion of the surveillance state & it sets a dangerous precedent worldwide.
Sign our petition to #StopFacialRecognition⤵️
https://t.co/9do8SIF81t
This is a disgusting betrayal of the Brexit vote.
He has no authority to do this - and it will only further cripple our economy - and give away our money.
Voters must demand respect.
Digital ID: Here is the WEF's plan for you, straight from their website.
Their goal is to create a situation whereby every aspect of daily life—healthcare, banking, food, travel, internet, social media, communications, energy usage, etc—requires a valid digital ID, without which you are locked out.
Once that situation is in place, the conditions of validity can be adjusted to anything they want.
You didn't take the latest experimental mRNA injection? Then your Digital ID is invalid.
You posted something deemed "misinformation" on social media? Then your Digital ID is invalid.
Your social credit score fell too low? Your Digital ID wil be invalid.
You exceeded your monthly carbon allowance? Your Digital ID will be invalid.
You voiced criticism of your new technocratic overlords? Then your Digital ID is invalid.
If governments are ever allowed to succeed in rolling out digital ID—even if it's through the back door via under-16 social media bans—we will find ourselves living in a giant open-air digital prison, from which it will be virtually impossible to ever escape.
But they can only succeed if humanity complies with their agenda. DO NOT COMPLY.
Read this open statement by Signal and your jaw will hit the floor.
Govts always use “protecting children” as their guise for more control and censorship.
I interviewed a prev Govt minister, who wrote the Online Safety Bill, and asked if they could tell me how a VPN worked. They couldn’t. These are the people writing these laws.
This new tool is another dangerous form of silent oppression that once again uses children’s safety as a guise to control the masses.
We can protect children online, but that starts at home, with parents, not in the Home Office, GCHQ, Apple, Google, Microsoft or Samsung.
My morning so far…I feel the need to get this off my chest 🤣🤦🏼♀️
At London Waterloo I tried to board my train as soon as the platform was announced, but my ticket wouldn’t scan.
Showed the guy my ticket & asked him to pls let me through the barriers. He said ‘no, you need to use your ticket’.
I showed him ticket & explained it wouldn’t scan. He shrugged & told me to ‘go & see that woman there’. Woman had a queue of people so I asked if she could let me through, she told me ‘no, you have to wait your turn’.
I waited, but conscious I only had minutes left, in desperation, I tried to buy another ticket at the machine, but the contactless wasn’t working. I tried to get another via the app, but it wouldn’t work (presumably because now, it was so close to departure?).
Anyway, I returned to the barrier exasperated. Please, I said to ‘the woman’, can you help me because I really need to board the train which is about to depart.
‘No. Wait your turn’ was again the response.
I went to two other staff members at the gates & showed them my ticket and said ‘please, can you just let me through the barriers’.
‘No, she needs to say we can’ was the response.
Anyway, you guessed it - I missed the train.😩🤬
As I said to all the staff members, if I had just turned up to the train & barged through the barriers, ticket-less, as so many seem to do these days, I would have been happily on the train and en route to the destination… Makes me wonder why we bother trying to do the right thing 🤷♀️
Argh! Anyway, I feel better now having got that off my chest! 😉
🆔Starmer's plans for child-locked devices is a Trojan horse for digital ID
"The only way to escape Starmer’s Great British Firewall and get regular internet access is to undergo a digital ID check on the device to register yourself as an adult user.
Convenient, perhaps, for a Prime Minister who has failed to get a digital ID system through the front door" - @silkiecarlo
You can tell from his eyes that he hasn't read this speech before.... he thinks he is delivering good news but even he quicklt realises he can't sell this.
The uk simply CANNOT support #data centres. We do not have the energy or water required. The USA is struggling - and they have a lot more space, power and water!!
And as usual, no journalists are asking the right questions. @GBNEWS would - but we are rarely allowed to get close enough.
Starmer outsourced censorship with Online Safety Act
Now he - along with some Tories - is determined to force digital id verification on us all to participate in the name of ‘protruding children’
No!
SUPERB! Trevor Phillip's BEAUTIFULLY exposes David Lammy and Labour's sickening hypocrisy.
He shows him the receipts of them ALL saying it's ok to feel "fury" and "anger" over George Floyd, while they criticise Farage for saying the same about Henry Nowak.
Satisfying to watch.
ONE LOGIN: "Say no to any form of government controlled central digital identification" @NorrisWindross
Government services should work for everyone
If people don’t want to use One Login, they must still be able to access essential services another way
No one should be forced into a single digital identity system to access essential services - but up to 8 million company directors are already being pushed into it @CompaniesHouse
Starmer is utterly deluded.
Here he is thrilled that the Unilever site in Warrington which closed with 140 job losses is being replaced by a 260,000 Data Centre …
which will employ about 40 people in total, many remotely.
Datacentres will NOT solve growing unemployment, they will only help increase it.
Senior figures at Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, under the command of Andy Burnham, have cautioned firefighters who support Reform UK over their political views.
In a further chilling assault on free speech, staff have also effectively been urged in an email to report colleagues who support Reform.
Fire brigade bosses have also said they are seeking legal advice on what to do about firefighters who decide to stand as Reform UK candidates. This is despite the fact that, unlike police officers, there is no legal bar preventing firefighters from participating in national or local politics.
In their email, fire brigade bosses Mr Petch and Ms Ahmed said: ’We are aware that some staff members have chosen to represent Reform UK in their local areas. We know this may cause concern within our network and wider.
’The individuals involved have been spoken to, to make it clear that as members of GMFRS (Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service) our core values and professional behaviours must be displayed at all times.
’The service is currently seeking formal legal guidance… to ensure we are protected from all perspectives and that our inclusive culture remains safe.
‘Our priority is and always will be ensuring that every member of this network feels supported, respected and safe at work.’
They also confirmed that they would be consulting the Fire Brigades Union on the matter.
In his role as Mayor of Greater Manchester, @AndyBurnhamGM — who is also tipped by some to be a future Prime Minister if he wins the Makerfield by-election — is also Greater Manchester’s Fire Commissioner, responsible for overseeing the service.
General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young of Acton, has now written to Mr Burnham to raise concerns about the chilling effect this has on free speech.
Lord Young said that the ‘clear implication’ of the email from the fire brigade bosses was that ‘representing Reform UK constitutes an inherent threat to the institution’s culture and values and is to be treated as morally suspect’. He also highlighted that no action appears to have been taken against firefighters who support other political parties.
The letter also states: ‘Staff are further invited to report colleagues who support any groups that go against the service’s values, which effectively amounts to an instruction to inform on colleagues for their political beliefs.
’The email will create a chilling effect on the free speech of GMFRS employees who support Reform.
’The practical effect is that a public fire and rescue service governed by you is treating the lawful political activity of your electoral opponents as a reputational risk to their employer.
‘Regardless of whether this reflects your instruction, it reflects your governance; and a public office-holder who permits his institution to demonise or chill the speech and political activity of those who support his principal electoral rival cannot claim to be discharging that office with the impartiality it demands.’
Read more below 👇
🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer threatens mandatory ID checks to use mobile phones
"Protecting children online is vital, but these are outrageous plans that will fail to address the underlying causes of online harm. This will only result in population-wide ID checks for all of us to use our phones, tablets and laptops.
"Put simply, the Labour Government is threatening ID checks for the internet. No one in a democracy should need to show their passport just to get online.
"These plans would replace efforts for meaningful tech and parental responsibility with performative, authoritarian government control that children can easily circumvent by accessing adult-registered devices. However, for the UK's 50 million adults using the internet, this backdoor digital ID requirement would invoke the death of anonymity and internet privacy.
"The Government's plan very likely means that unless you submit to intrusive identity checks when setting up your phone or computer, there will be a chokehold on your software and internet access leaving you with a child-locked device. Planned restrictions on messaging, streaming and browsing raise the potential of spyware in our pockets that will be exploited for other purposes before long.
"The Government mandating that all phones in Britain require ID and surveillance software is a crossing of the Rubicon that would make the UK one of the most authoritarian internet regimes in the world. This extreme technological censorship requires rigorous public and parliamentary scrutiny that is currently totally missing" - Silkie Carlo | @silkiecarlo
Someone needs to tell this man the law as a service provider! So many @marksandspencer have turned the WOMENs into an ‘anyones’ free for all, but kept the men’s ! Not ok
Australia lets the cat out of the bag!
In order to ban under 16s from social media, EVERYONE will have to have digital ID or they won’t be able to get on the internet
Starmer says Digital ID won’t be mandatory er Unless you never need the internet 🔥
🆔Digital ID AND facial recognition are now at the heart of the Government’s plans
It's crunch time - with your help, we can push back against Starmer's dangerous, multi-billion pound digital ID system and plans for mass biometric ID checks
Join us⤵️
https://t.co/S6SiOaa3Hc