Senior Advocates Rajshekhar Rao and Abhishek Malhotra appear against each other in a matter. After the hearing, Mr Malhotra tells the bench that he was Mr. Rao's roommate in college.
Justice Jyoti Singh: I don't know who suffered who.
Rao: We are 'Humsafar' milords.
Credit where it’s due: the lead petition in the Danam Nagender disqualification case was filed by BJP MLA Alleti Maheshwar Reddy.
Chintal Ramchander Reddy followed up, while the legal team of senior advocate K. Vivek Reddy, Mithun Shashank and Avaneesh N. repeatedly mentioned the matter before the Chief Justice’s court, leading to a hearing and order within six months of the Speaker’s decision.
Now BJP is filing a caveat in Supreme Court
TV Debate Or Comedy Show
“Aajkal TV Debates Mein Politics Kam Aur Memes Jyada Ho Gaye Hain”
On Delhi Dialogues, hosted by Bureaucrat, Ishaan Sharma, Shehzad Poonawala two unforgettable moments from heated Indian TV debates that turned into meme fest.
A. The moment he mentioned his mother’s birthday and Congress leader Supriya Shrinate into the argument.
🤣🤣🤣
B. The DMK spokesperson’s uncontrollable laughter that turned the debate into a meme fest.
😂😂😂
Is Indian political debate becoming serious discussion or pure entertainment?
Credit : The Delhi Dialogues.
Have tried to give some insight into why alcohol still finds its way into professional cricket dressing rooms. Article best enjoyed relaxed, with a drink, and preferably responsibly.
https://t.co/zSKtEQPjcm
We have gone from asking a shopkeeper “UPI hai?” to simply scanning a QR code and moving on. A chai stall, a vegetable vendor, a cab driver, a small shop...
Cash is no longer king.
Technology works only when it stops making people feel intimidated.
The larger the acceptability the more the success.
https://t.co/vjfvOD4JxJ
Looking at the quality and dramatic effect of this entire episode, BigBoss should consider contacting these people. Good stuff. Predictable stuff.
Order withdrawn last night, no cause of action remaining, but the show must go on and the headlines must be tweeted.
A 10/10 performance by K. Parameshwar here, Oscar-worthy stuff.
BREAKING | Plea against BCI’s letters to NALSAR mentioned before Supreme Court
Sr. Adv. K Parameshwar: BCI has no business of what’s going on in a university.
CJI Kant: naturally this is absolutely uncalled for. It’s a dialogue between students and me. Who are they to raise an issue? This is totally uncalled for. In my student days I have been actively involved in student activities. Assuming even if they are wrong they have a right to protest. BCI doesn’t have any business.
Order: issue notice. Meanwhile no action shall be taken punitive action to be taken against student or faculty of any national law university/law university.
#JustIn: Before the Supreme Court—
A Counsel seeks an adjournment on the ground that the Solicitor General Tushar Mehta is out of the country.
“Only the Solicitor General can appear for the State? No one is indispensable. You can go on with another counsel”- Justice Sanjay Kumar
The Bench notes that there is a “wide array” of senior counsel available to represent the State and says it is unfair to keep insisting on one particular counsel.
“Your numbers are continuously increasing, and in spite of that, you say, I only want to stick to one person. It is unfair to the others”- J. Kumar
Ultimately, the matter was adjourned.
Reckless rhetoric!
Disagree with the bench; criticise the remark. But imputing motives to judges, and then casually prescribing resignation or impeachment crosses a very different line.
Judicial accountability is important. So is accountability in the criticism of judges.
Supreme Court hears plea by TMC MP Mahua Moitra to appear virtually before the IO in an FIR against a Facebook post wherein she allegedly made provocative statements
Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu