mjay

sa digma, isisilang ang payapa 🔻

[mjay @mjayguinto]

@HAVEnriquez welcome po 🤭

[mjay @mjayguinto]

no one:

mga straight: ARAY KOO

[Kumare Harvey @KumareHarvey]

Twink twinkan para makantot

[Drag Fans Philippines @DragFansPH]

WE CHEERED!

[mjay @mjayguinto]

@bryncsio kulang nalang dilaan niya pwet ng mga Discaya

[Pocket @islandthembo]

I’m losing it

[Callum Asplen @callumasplen]

Since Pope Francis is unable to fulfill his duties, Coco Montrese will step in as the head of the catholic church.

[toxic yuri butterfly @ancientlovesong]

it's time for my favorite vid on the internet

[mjay @mjayguinto]

mga babaeng icc judges mamaya kapag haharap na ang manyak at misogynist na si duterte:

[pie ⋆˚꩜.ᐟ @pietwokay]

john lapus bilang ICC judge:

https://t.co/zwHxaMIp4K

[mark geronimo @markgeronimo_]

TANGINA GOOD MORNING TAWANG TAWA AKO PUTANGINA HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT IS THIS UTUTAN SERYE HAHAAHAHAH

[rhys 🌖🌱 @hypotowers]

never forget that imelda marcos is evil

[lex salle @f4ggotism]

OWKAY TUTOR FAMILY!!!!

[Philippine Supreme Court Public Information Office @SCPh_PIO]

The Supreme Court reiterated that using online chat logs and videos as evidence does not violate the right to privacy if they are used to determine if a crime has been committed.

The Court upheld the conviction of a man for qualified trafficking in persons under Republic Act No. 9208 or the Anti-Trafficking of Persons Act of 2003, finding that the videos and recordings of the chat logs of his conversations with an undercover agent can be admitted as evidence.

The Court rejected the accused’s arguments that they were inadmissible for violating his privacy rights. Republic Act No. 10173, or the Data Privacy Act of 2012, allows the processing of sensitive personal information to determine a person’s criminal liability and to protect the rights and interests of persons in court proceedings.

As the chat logs and videos were submitted as evidence to assess his criminal liability for qualified trafficking, his right to privacy was not violated.

The Court emphasized that the videos and chat logs were presented as evidence to show the accused’s method of reaching out to foreigners through Skype or Facebook and offering minors for sexual exploitation.

The Decision is from the Supreme Court’s Second Division, written by Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez.

Read the full text of the press release at: https://t.co/Rn00LfBflf

Read the full text of the Decision at: https://t.co/8kPi31W6un

#SupremeCourtPH

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/F48RF1vtzZ

[mjay @mjayguinto]

@guerra_cantos nasa gay universe ka yata nak

[mjay @mjayguinto]

Nakakatawa yung mga trapo kase previously, sukang suka sila kay Leni, tapos ngayon lapit sila nang lapit 😭😭😭

[mjay @mjayguinto]

these heartless mfs in power

[mjay @mjayguinto]

@bryncsio GET HER

[jab @drivewayscene]

this is crazy....