eventually, permaybe š¤š
Feasibility for guitar specifically
⢠Watching and learning shapes/transitions: It can observe video of a human forming chords, changing shapes, and playing sequences, then map the observed kinematics and timing onto its own actuators. Research outside Tesla already shows physics-based and neural synthesis of dual-hand guitar motions (fretting + picking) from reference data and tabs, including automatic fingering inference and natural transitions. Humanoid drumming and other instrument skills are also being learned via reinforcement learning on rhythmic contact sequences. Optimusās end-to-end visual learning + scale of data/compute makes this a natural extension once general dexterity matures.
⢠Embodying the application: Once it can form and transition between chord shapes with reliable timing, Optimus can physically play a guitar in sync with audio or a scoreāserving as a live, physical demonstration of the synchronized chord visualizations discussed earlier. It could watch a performance or instructional video, internalize the shapes and transitions, then perform, teach, or accompany. Timing precision, rhythmic locking, and multi-limb coordination are the same class of problems already being solved for other timed manipulation and locomotion tasks.
Remaining gaps and realistic timeline
Current (2026) Optimus units are still in early production ramp and focused mainly on structured factory tasks. Highly skilled, continuous musical performance under real acoustic constraints (exact fret contact, string vibration feedback, posture stability while fretting) is not yet demonstrated and will require further refinement of fine force control, contact-rich policies, and longer-horizon sequencing. Guitar is harder than many pick-and-place tasks because of the combination of precision, speed of transitions, and sensory feedback loops.
āEventuallyā is the key word. Teslaās explicit goal is human-level then superhuman dexterity, generalized task learning from observation, and massive scale (production starting at Fremont in 2026 with ambitions for far higher volumes later). With the learning flywheel, compute growth, and hardware iteration, skilled guitar chord work and full performances are well within the projected capability envelopeālikely appearing first as controlled demos and then as robust skills once the core manipulation stack is solid. Specialized music robots already exist; a general-purpose humanoid with Optimusās learning approach should close the gap.
The hold-down clamps are under a substantial upward (restraining / tensile) load at the moment of release ā this is the ānegative loadā relative to the vehicleās weight.
How the loading works
ā¢When the engines are off or producing less thrust than the vehicleās weight, the clamps (or the supporting structure they engage) primarily carry the stackās weight in compression.
ā¢As the 33 Raptor engines ramp up and thrust exceeds the stackās weight, the net force reverses: the clamps must now hold the booster down. This restraining force is tensile (upward on the vehicle / downward reaction on the clamp linkage).
At commanded release the clamps are therefore reacting a large net upward force equal to roughly:
Thrust ā vehicle weight
Approximate scale (current V3-era numbers)
ā¢Fully stacked and fueled Starship mass is in the ~5,000ā5,300 tonne range.
ā¢33 Ć Raptor 3 sea-level engines at the currently stated ~250 tf each give roughly 8,250 tonnes of thrust.
ā¢Liftoff thrust-to-weight is designed to be comfortably above 1 (commonly discussed in the 1.4ā1.5 range historically for the architecture).
This leaves a net upward force on the order of thousands of tonnes that must be restrained by the ~20 clamps just before they open. The load is shared across the clamps (which engage an internal structural ring near the base of the booster, between the outer engines). SpaceX has load sensors on the arms and monitors the force balance in real time as part of the release interlocks.
Why they release under load
Release is commanded only after the engines are confirmed healthy and thrust is stable. Opening under a clear positive (upward) residual load ensures the vehicle lifts cleanly and does not sit back onto the mount or bind the mechanisms. The clamps then retract extremely rapidly so they are clear of the exhaust plume.
Exact residual load at the precise instant of release is not publicly stated ā it depends on the exact propellant load, achieved thrust, and the precise release timing on that flight ā but the system is deliberately operated with a meaningful restraining force present. The redesigned Pad 2 / V3 hold-downs were specifically improved for better load sharing and reliable throw-back under these conditions.
Kinda recently we sent out whaling ships to recover whales!
Commercial whaling for lamp oil began around 1000 CE with the Basque population, who established seasonal settlements in Labrador by the 1530s and expanded to the Arctic by 1611.
The industry shifted to North America in the 18th century, with the United States whaling fleet peaking in 1846 with 735 ships.
The industry declined rapidly after 1857 when kerosene replaced whale oil as the primary lamp fuel, leading to a near-total collapse of the American whaling fleet by the 1860s.
The SS Minnow was a 1964 Wheeler with a top speed of 12 knots, meaning that they couldnāt have travelled more than 36 nautical miles. Now Iām not sure if the show was even real.