Spiritus🌞

If you don't take care of your body, where are you going to live? In the face of evidence, the wise man changes his mind.

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@big_simp @facetedcarapace Love it

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@KingKong9888 I guess lying is the way now

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@Liathetrader @HealthyAlfred For what conditions

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@twetsfyp @DensLairStudio

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@kimianora Allowing the emotions changes everything

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@DensLairStudio I hear your frustration, maybe if you get verified that would give you more credibility ?

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@ihtesham2005 @big_simp

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A German psychologist spent her career proving that the embarrassing habit of talking to your dog is one of the most powerful stress-regulation tools the human nervous system has, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Andrea Beetz.

She works at the University of Rostock in northern Germany, in the Department of Special Education.

In 2012 she co-authored a paper in Frontiers in Psychology with three other European researchers, and the finding inside it should have changed how every doctor on Earth thinks about loneliness, stress, and the strange habit human beings have of narrating their lives to animals who cannot speak back.

The paper was not a single experiment. It was a review of 69 separate peer-reviewed studies on what happens inside the human body during interactions with pets, all of which met strict criteria for sample size, research design, and scientific rigor.

Her co-authors were not minor names either. Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg is the Swedish physician who spent decades mapping how oxytocin works in the human bloodstream. Kurt Kotrschal runs the Wolf Science Center in Austria and is one of the most respected animal cognition researchers in Europe. Henri Julius studies attachment between humans and animals. Together they assembled the cleanest summary of what science actually knows about why being around a pet changes a person.

The results across the 69 studies were almost embarrassingly consistent. When a human being interacts with an animal they have any bond with, the same physiological cascade happens almost every time. Cortisol drops, which is the primary stress hormone in the bloodstream. Blood pressure drops, both systolic and diastolic. Heart rate slows. Self-reported anxiety decreases. Mood improves measurably on standardized scales.

And underneath all of it, the hormone called oxytocin rises in the human bloodstream.

Oxytocin is the molecule that floods a mother's body during childbirth and breastfeeding. It is the same chemical released during orgasm, during a long hug with someone you love, during the deep eye contact between a parent and a newborn.

It is the hormone the human body uses to mark another living being as safe, familiar, and worth bonding with. It widens the blood vessels, slows the heart, suppresses the production of cortisol, and quietly tells the nervous system that the threat level in the environment is low enough that the body can repair itself instead of bracing for danger.

The 69 studies the team reviewed found that the same molecule rises in the human bloodstream when you pet your dog, hold your cat, watch your fish, or talk softly to a parrot that does not understand a single word you are saying.

The strangest finding in the whole paper is that the animal does not have to understand you for the system to work. The mechanism is not based on actual comprehension.

It is based on the act of directing social attention toward a living presence and feeling, on some level, that the presence is paying attention back. The brain only requires perceived reciprocity. It does not require real reciprocity.

In 2015, a Japanese research team led by Miho Nagasawa published a study in the journal Science that pushed the finding even further. They measured oxytocin levels in 30 dog and owner pairs before and after the dogs and owners interacted for 30 minutes.

When dogs and owners exchanged long periods of eye contact, oxytocin rose in both species. Not just in the human. In the dog too. And the longer the gaze, the bigger the spike on both sides of the leash. The same study tried the experiment with hand-raised wolves and got nothing. The loop was specific to the bond that domestic dogs and humans had spent 15,000 years building together.

What Beetz and her team had identified through 69 studies, Nagasawa proved with direct hormone measurements in a controlled lab. The act of looking into your dog's eyes and talking to it is running the same neurochemical program that a mother runs with her newborn baby. The brain treats the interaction as social bonding because, biologically, it is.

The implication is the part that should change how you live. People who narrate their day to their dog are not lonely or strange. They are using one of the oldest stress-regulation systems the human nervous system has ever built. The habit looks embarrassing from the outside and feels completely natural from the inside because it is doing exactly what the body evolved to do when a safe presence is nearby.

The research was clean enough that the entire field of Animal-Assisted Therapy was built on top of it. Therapy dogs now work in hospitals, psychiatric wards, schools for children with autism, prisons, hospice care, and disaster relief sites across more than 30 countries. The protocols are formal. The interventions are measurable. The science behind why a dog in the room lowers a patient's blood pressure during chemotherapy is the same science Beetz and her team summarized in 2012.

The most haunting line in the paper is the one near the end where the authors point out that the oxytocin pathway evolved long before language did. The system was already in place when our ancestors lived in caves and the first wild dogs started circling human fires. The hormone never required words. It just required a body next to a body.

When you talk to your cat about your day, the words are doing almost nothing. The animal hearing your voice while you direct attention toward it is doing almost everything.

You can run the experiment yourself the next time you feel your nervous system tightening up. Stop scrolling, put the phone down, and sit on the floor with whatever animal is in your house. Talk to it. Look at it. Pet it. Let your shoulders drop.

The hormone the rest of the world is selling in podcasts and supplements is already inside you, waiting for the signal.

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Russian psychologist spent 10 years proving that the act of talking to yourself out loud is one of the most powerful cognitive tools the human brain has, and almost nobody outside his field has read the work.

His name was Lev Vygotsky.

He worked in Moscow in the 1920s and died of tuberculosis in 1934 at the age of 37. He had no laboratory, no funding, almost no English readers, and a body of work that the Soviet government suppressed for two decades after he died.

He produced the foundational theory of how human cognition actually develops, and the central piece of that theory was a behavior almost every adult is faintly embarrassed about.

Vygotsky noticed that young children talk to themselves constantly. They narrate their own actions, they argue with imaginary opponents, they instruct themselves through tasks out loud.

The dominant theory at the time, from the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, said this was a sign of cognitive immaturity that children would eventually grow out of as they learned to think properly.

Vygotsky said the exact opposite.

He argued that this self-directed speech was the most important cognitive event in the entire developmental window, because it was the moment a child first started to use language as a tool to control their own mind. The child was not failing to think. The child was learning how to think by externalizing the process and listening to themselves do it.

He predicted that as children matured, this out-loud self-talk would not disappear. It would go underground. It would become silent inner speech, which is the running monologue every adult has inside their own head for the rest of their life.

The voice you hear when you read this sentence is the direct descendant of a four-year-old narrating their own block tower.

For 50 years almost nobody outside Russia had access to his work, and the few researchers who did pick it up could not get funding to test it. Then in the early 2000s the experiments finally started to pile up, and what they found was that Vygotsky had been right about something even more important than he knew.

The first major study came from Gary Lupyan at the University of Wisconsin and Daniel Swingley at the University of Pennsylvania in 2012. They ran a simple visual search experiment. Participants were shown 20 images at once and asked to find a specific object, like a banana or a chair. In one condition they searched silently. In the other condition they were told to say the name of the object out loud to themselves while looking for it.

The participants who spoke the target name out loud found the object significantly faster, with higher accuracy, than the participants who searched in silence. The effect was strongest when the spoken word matched a familiar object the brain already had a strong category for.

Saying the word out loud literally tuned the visual system to detect that thing better. The researchers called it the label feedback effect, and the implication was that the act of vocalizing a goal physically changes how the brain processes the world while pursuing it.

The second major study came out of the University of Michigan and Michigan State in 2017. The lead researchers were Ethan Kross and Jason Moser, and they used both EEG and fMRI to record what happens inside the brain when people talk to themselves while emotionally upset.

They asked participants to recall painful autobiographical memories and reflect on them in two different ways. Some used the first person, saying things like "why am I feeling this way." Others used the third person, referring to themselves by their own name, saying things like "why is John feeling this way."

The brain scans showed that the simple act of switching from first person to third person, even silently, decreased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, the region responsible for rumination and self-referential pain. Within a single second of using their own name instead of the word I, participants showed measurably lower emotional reactivity. The shift required no extra cognitive effort. It cost the brain nothing. And it worked.

Kross described the mechanism in his interviews. Talking to yourself by name creates a small amount of psychological distance from your own experience. Your brain processes the situation more like a problem belonging to someone else, which means it can analyze it instead of drowning in it.

What Vygotsky had intuited in 1934 turned out to be even more powerful than the developmental theory he built it into. The voice you use to talk to yourself is not background noise. It is one of the most precise cognitive tools the brain has, and you can change how it works just by changing the pronoun you use.

People who talk through problems out loud are not anxious or unstable. They are running an externalized version of a process the rest of us are running silently and worse. The kindergartener narrating their block tower, the surgeon muttering through a procedure, the engineer pacing a hallway describing a bug to nobody, the athlete repeating a cue to themselves before a free throw, they are all using the same ancient mechanism that builds and steers human thought.

You can run the experiment yourself the next time you are stuck on something hard. Stop trying to solve it silently in your head. Say it out loud. Describe what you are seeing. Walk yourself through the steps as if you were explaining it to a colleague who is not in the room.

And when something genuinely upsets you, switch to your own name. Ask why this person is feeling this way, instead of why I am feeling this way.

The voice you have been told to keep quiet your entire life is one of the oldest pieces of cognitive technology you own.

Most people are still embarrassed to use it.

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@bioenergeticmel Non processed emotions are what is causing your nervous system disregulation, no supplements can fix that!

[Harshi Peiris, Ph.D. @Neuroscope_mp]

🔴Promising new data:
Red light therapy is showing real results in Parkinson's disease clinical trials —
gait improves, tremors ease, and new brain imaging suggests it may actually protect dopamine neurons.

This isn't fringe science.
It's peer-reviewed.

Here's what the data shows 🧵👇
#Parkinsons #NeurologyResearch

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@ShawnRyan762 @big_simp

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@BrianRoemmele @big_simp

[Brian Roemmele @BrianRoemmele]

Over the years I would hear:

“How is Keith Richards still going?”

I knew one of his secrets in the early 1980s and odds are you never heard of it.

Most assuredly he would not be here today if he did not meet Meg and her Black Box:

“It’s so simple...It's a little metal box with leads that clip on to your ears and in two or three days-which is the worst period for kicking junk-in these 72 hours it leaves your system”— Keith Richards, 1985

You should have heard of it.

It should have been a standard tool in medicine.

I wrote about it in the https://t.co/tcKeuiQyql article listed below.

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@Rainmaker1973 @big_simp

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@biancadava @big_simp

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@OwenBenjamin @big_simp

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@officialrnintel @big_simp

[Spiritus🌞 @Mmagnet7]

@chrismartenson @BerwickJeff You’re actually using scammer Jeff as a credible expert on oil issues 😂