"...if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven." ✝️
@RockyBay1980@krebiozen@toobaffled They tried it again only weeks ago with Hantavirus. Funny how it was almost exactly the same optics. Thankfully no one fell for it.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled You clearly can't admit you were lied to. Can't help you, sorry. Having such blind faith in a medical system built on profits is a scary thing. Good luck to you.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled Vast amounts of stuff from where? Look around you. Everyone I know still don't know a single person who died 'from' Covid. Nurse whistleblowers have exposed it was the protocols what were killing many comorbid people in hospitals.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled So why were young people mandated? Yes, 80+ was the average age of a Covid death, in many countries higher than the usual average.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled Seriously? She was part of the initial Pfizer trial. Further, you don't have access to her medical records, so not sure how you can be so certain it wasn't the vaccine. Besides, me and all my unvaxed buddies should be dead by now given how 'deadly' they told us Covid was.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled If you ignore all other sources of information bar the 'government approved' ones you will come up precisely with the conclusions they would have you believe. There is a bigger picture with all sorts of other credible data, but it's not in a printed, peer-reviewed study.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled And many doctors were giving people vaccine exemptions, how did they profit from this? Yet they ended up before the regulators.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled While it's possible there were some like this, many doctors who offered alternatives have been vindicated. Further, if anyone was truly profiting from Covid it was big pharma. Ivermectin is cheap after all.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled You might think it's absurd & pre-Covid I might have even agreed with you but once your eyes are open to just how absurd this world and its structures are, there's no looking away.
@krebiozen@RockyBay1980@toobaffled Doctors are more concerned about their reputations and not being taken to task by regulators. Clearly not enough were prepared to ask questions about the rushed and mandated COVID vaccine. The few who did speak up paid a harsh price. Tells you a lot about modern medicine.
Taking 100% of someone's productive capacity is rightly called slavery, and it remains slavery even if you house, clothe, feed, and provide the slaves with healthcare.
The fact that you spend some of the money you stole from them keeping them alive so they can keep working in slavery doesn't make you less of a slave owner.
Everyone agrees on that.
So at what % is it no longer slavery?
Is taking 80% 'not slavery' as long as you spend it on the slaves?
What about 'only' taking 50%?
Historically 10% has been defined as 'slavery', see 1 Samuel 8 for one such example, although there are many more.
And revolutions have been started by taxes far lower than 10%.
Today, WE are the outliers, the anomalies. We accept as normal what our ancestors would have found absolutely outrageous.
Today a median Australian full time salary earner will fork out 55%-60% in taxes and government charges when you take EVERYTHING into account, meaning they only get the benefit of 40%-45% of their productivity.
It's not a whole lot better in the USA, and it's actually even worse in many parts of Europe.
I'm not impressed by the argument that 'they spend it on things we need'.
I would have done the same only I'm better and knowing what I need and far better at making sure my money is being well used.
Not everyone is ready to talk about full voluntaryism and getting the government completely out of our lives, but can we all agree that anything above 10% taxation is a form of slavery and work together to end slavery for good?
@krebiozen@toobaffled Yes, I understand that. There are also so many testimonies of vax injured people whose doctors dismissed the very adverse events they were reporting, not to mention the gaslighting of families of dead vaccine recipients.
I would say Pfizer has published A LIST, not THE LIST of adverse events- aka: AEs, and serious adverse events- aka: SAEs, or side effects and SAEs of Special Interest.
Published in
BNT162b2 5.3.6
Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization List of Adverse Event
Check it out for yourself at https://t.co/KQJKfpOiMo
I'll post a quick ref guide pdf of 89 pages of over 1,200 AEs and SAEs from their own documents that we published over 100 reports in 2 Best Selling books. Once I figure out how to post a PDF file here on X.