✿ sophia ✿

[kos @kostancaaa__]

all the lindsay clancy case proves is that multiple things can be true at once but all of you have only one brain cell so that may be hard to comprehend

[lo 🦭 @packersloren]

No matter where you stand on the Lindsay Clancy case, I think it’s wild that men are using it to say women should not have the right to vote.

[kiki🌸 @kikii055]

if women are the problem, why do men want more than one?

[BrutalBrittany💕 @BrutalBrittany2]

“Women are too emotional to have rational thoughts,” says the demographic responsible for 78.7% of violent-crime arrests.

Noted.

[Hold My Halo @holdmyhalo41sec]

What real psychosis looks like:

“The jury’s wearing pink!”
“She’s gonna walk”
“Now all the moms are gonna kill their kids!”
“What’s taking so long?!”
“The jury’s been deliberating for a whole day!”

Get a fucking grip you lunatics. Let the jury do its job.

[AmorLucisMA @AmorLucisMA]

What the Lindsay Clancy trial taught me—people will use any excuse to hate on women even at the expense of the law/due process. In MA, the prosecution has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense proved a reasonable counter story=not criminally responsible.

[✿ sophia ✿ @mmithfiend]

@WindchimeBridge @proamericapol You have your opinions. I have my opinions. Have a wonderful day.

[✿ sophia ✿ @mmithfiend]

@proamericapol I also believe death is too good for some monsters out there.

They should rot in solitary for the rest of their sad, miserable little lives.

[✿ sophia ✿ @mmithfiend]

@proamericapol I’m not shifting the blame off of Lindsay. There’s no debate here, she killed her kids. I’m saying several things can be true at once. I believe these deaths could have been prevented if people listened to what she was telling them. Don’t lump me in with the conspiracy theorists.

[Sue O'Connell: COMMENTATOR, not a reporter @SueOC_NBCBoston]

@PenJustWrites1 @TMcTesterson666 I’m really concerned about the reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, and the attention spans of some X users.

[Mandy @MarindaVannoy1]

Mom to mom, woman to woman, if she were truly innocent, she would beg for death. As a parent, you know I’m right.

[Kay @jacelala]

Unpopular opinion but if you had watched the commonwealth present their case in the Lindsay Clancy trial, you’d understand why the jury is still deliberating.

[Michele @michellmybell1]

One woman kills her children and men want to remove all rights away from all women. Meanwhile a man kills his entire family around every five days. Men rape and kill women and children daily. Some men plead NGRI and these men are not out here demanding any men lose their rights. Doesn’t make any sense.

[selfpaglu. @maramarvellous_]

Funny how one case is enough for men to start questioning women and feminism, but centuries of male violence haven’t made anyone question patriarchy.

[✿ sophia ✿ @mmithfiend]

@proamericapol Lindsey tried repeatedly to get help from doctors and instead was given a cocktail of prescriptions. People close to Lindsey said she warned them she was having thoughts of killing her kids. Why leave her home alone with the kids if she said she wanted to kill them?

[✿ sophia ✿ @mmithfiend]

@GiaMMacool Lindsay Clancy’s defence is she was in postpartum PSYCHOSIS, not “her hormones were acting up.” Men can also commit a crime while in psychosis and be found not guilty. Lindsay Clancy’s case isn’t going to change the law. Quit using AI to fear monger and educate yourself.

[✿ sophia ✿ @mmithfiend]

@JuneMariellary Lindsay Clancy’s defence is she was in postpartum PSYCHOSIS, not “her hormones were acting up.” Men can also commit a crime while in psychosis and be found not guilty. Lindsay Clancy’s case isn’t going to change the law. Quit using AI to fear monger and educate yourself.

[✿ sophia ✿ @mmithfiend]

@LukeDaleLive okay zizka…