MMJL

[MMJL @mmjl87]

My girls ❤️

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@NCBubblehead @urfriendmeg Do it in your own zone. Center ice on the logo is classless

[MMJL @mmjl87]

Absolute garbage from the @Canes on this. You want to do it in your own zone .. fine. Celebrate, enjoy it but not on the center logo in a visiting rink. Classless.

But then again, that’s @Martyman17

[meg @urfriendmeg]

this will never not be funny to me. they absolutely embarrassed the fuck out of vegas, shutting out that evil ass team and making carter hart go down as the worst goalie in finals HISTORY, made him CRY and then did the storm surge on THEIR ice and logo

[Scott McLaughlin @smclaughlin9]

Update: Vegas lost Game 6, 3-0.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@TonyDasco I put in a Bussi as soon as I could. He deserves it. Anderson stays in they don’t win cup. Won’t win though.

[Scott McLaughlin @smclaughlin9]

Tortorella said the same thing in 2019 after the Bruins went up 3-2 on Columbus. Also said they "dented" Rask.

Bruins won Game 6, 3-0, in Columbus to end the series. Rask had a 39-save shutout.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

Welp. It was a fun season. Congrats Jerks

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@JosieAve Have fun.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@wyshynski @AikmanCMU Thanks for saying that the @NHL screwed the Knights. Shouldn’t have been able to challenge if so.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@stoolpresidente @BizNasty2point0 If he intended to blow the whistle, you can’t challenge that. Why did the @NHLPR allow Vegas to challenge?

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@KrikorianB15 If that’s the case. Vegas shouldn’t have been allowed to challenge

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@Buccigross Bucci.. No idea how this isn’t a goal but If is not a goal, why could Vegas challenge?
it’s under the goalie the play is dead. Can’t be reviewed (dead in the head) , yet they were allowed to review it. if they can challenge goalie interference then the puck was never covered.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@jasondemers5 Sorry Jason, but this whole review STINKS

So if it’s under the goalie the play is dead. Can’t be reviewed (dead in the head) , yet they were allowed to review it. So if they can challenge goalie interference then the puck was never covered.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@DannyWebster21 So if it’s under the goalie the play is dead. Can’t be reviewed (dead in the head) , yet they were allowed to review it. So if they can challenge goalie interference then the puck was never covered.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@TonyDasco @Rebel_Net Tony, if the play was blown dead, then you can’t challenge. They were allowed to challenge…. NHL screwed them.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@JesseGranger_ So if it’s under the goalie the play is dead. Can’t be reviewed (dead in the head) , yet they were allowed to review it. So if they can challenge goalie interference then the puck was never covered.

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@ryanwhitney6 If the play is reviewable for goalie interference, it means the puck was still alive.

If the goalie had it covered or it was dead in the head then it shouldn’t be reviewable. Therefore they can’t challenge and they don’t get the penalty.

Whistle blew when the puck was in net

[MMJL @mmjl87]

The @NHL refs just screwed the Knights. If the puck was “covered” or “dead in the head” the play was over. Not reviewable.

However, since it WAS reviewed it means that the play was still alive and you play til you hear the whistle (puck is in the net) @SinBinVegas

[MMJL @mmjl87]

@VGKFlamingo @dana_zamzim66 @pwhl_lasvegas Dames

[MMJL @mmjl87]

Gets upset not allowing a coach to communicate and teams censoring questions. Then turns off her comments. 😂

[Rachel Kryshak @RachelKryshak]

Between signing Hart, allowing no questions about it, preventing Bruce Cassidy from coaching, and whatever nonsense is coming out of Mitch Marner’s mouth…Vegas is the most unlikable team in a Cup Final since?

Lot more awful storylines than good ones.