@Harhargrande@GraceRandolph well that is ridiculous cuz thats not what i said at all dont misconstrue just because u dont understand. you’ve done that a lot. Its kinda ironic ur upset that u think i’m minimizing a producers role when this thread started because you minimized the creative’s role. again bffr
@Harhargrande@GraceRandolph and if it does, you’ve reached the heart of our disagreement and theres no point debating semantics cuz i’m debating union-delegated job descriptions while ur debating on what constitutes participation
@Harhargrande@GraceRandolph is that a copy and paste cuz i’d love to hear the source and hope its not ai generated cuz the language used in it exactly displays the source of our disagreement. Producers “shape” scripts by demanding cuts or rewrites. Let me ask you this. Does that sound creating to u?
@Harhargrande@GraceRandolph creative input is not in any producer’s contract!! producer is a job title and its not in the job description ever!! they are business managers!! i dont know how many times i can repeat the same google-able fact. you’ll realize once you work under that protocol.
@Harhargrande@GraceRandolph its actually not different thats why i used the word protocol if you step outside your contractual role you will be fired. they call them “producer notes” and not “producer ideas” for a reason. producers pay people for their ideas
@Harhargrande@GraceRandolph like i said, managing the creatives does not make you a part of the creative process this is very basic above-the-line protocol that I myself have worked under
@Harhargrande@GraceRandolph decide and manage are two different things. producers don’t decide how a scene is lit, where the camera is placed, how the set is dressed, what characters wear,…
I wholeheartedly support Ari Aster in his mission to make a movie that causes congress to ban the act of making movies, ushering in an era of prohibition bootleg cinema that will heal the American soul